Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc
{"title":"在评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级一致和不一致的预后时,低流量的性别特异性阈值的影响。","authors":"Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeae272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jeae272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae272\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:低血流的性别特异性最近被定义为男性搏出量指数(SVi)≤40 ml/m²,女性≤32 ml/m²。我们根据压力恢复调整后的主动脉瓣面积(能量损失,EL),测试了这些临界值与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的预后相关性:方法:1351 名无症状 AS 患者的数据,喷射速度峰值 结果:CGASEL 和 DGASEL 均为正常/低流量:915/253例患者存在正常/低流量的CGASEL,57/126例患者存在正常/低流量的DGASEL。在中位 4.3 年的随访中,与血流正常的 CGASEL 相比,无论血流如何,DGASEL 患者的无事件生存率均较低(p 结论:通过性别来识别低血流的方法是非常重要的:在将 SVi 应用于临床实践之前,还需要对根据 SVi 性别特异性阈值确定低血流进行更多的预后验证。
Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.
Objective: Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).
Methods: Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.
Results: CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.
Conclusions: Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.
The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.