在评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级一致和不一致的预后时,低流量的性别特异性阈值的影响。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeae272
Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc
{"title":"在评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级一致和不一致的预后时,低流量的性别特异性阈值的影响。","authors":"Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeae272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Edda Bahlmann, Eva Gerdts, Eigir Einarsen, Helga Midtbø, Eva R Pedersen, Anne Rossebø, Stephan Willems, Dana Cramariuc\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jeae272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae272\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:低血流的性别特异性最近被定义为男性搏出量指数(SVi)≤40 ml/m²,女性≤32 ml/m²。我们根据压力恢复调整后的主动脉瓣面积(能量损失,EL),测试了这些临界值与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的预后相关性:方法:1351 名无症状 AS 患者的数据,喷射速度峰值 结果:CGASEL 和 DGASEL 均为正常/低流量:915/253例患者存在正常/低流量的CGASEL,57/126例患者存在正常/低流量的DGASEL。在中位 4.3 年的随访中,与血流正常的 CGASEL 相比,无论血流如何,DGASEL 患者的无事件生存率均较低(p 结论:通过性别来识别低血流的方法是非常重要的:在将 SVi 应用于临床实践之前,还需要对根据 SVi 性别特异性阈值确定低血流进行更多的预后验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.

Objective: Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤40 ml/m² in men and ≤32 ml/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS (CGASEL and DGASEL) based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area (energy loss, EL).

Methods: Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4m/s and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in AS study was used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg, and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. Outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure.

Results: CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow in 57/126 patients. During median 4.3 years follow-up, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (p<0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement and aortic valve calcification (p<0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.

Conclusions: Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
期刊最新文献
Multiple pseudoaneurysms caused by Brucella infection. Accuracy of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony indices for mechanical characteristics of left bundle branch block using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. Alarming Complication: Chest Compression-induced Right Ventricular Lead Perforation. Accurate prediction of systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with pulmonary valve stenosis. Interrupted Aortic Arch with Complete Atrioventricular Canal Defect: Insights from CT Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1