假体乳房再造手术后假体周围感染的微生物学:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023
Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro
{"title":"假体乳房再造手术后假体周围感染的微生物学:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, particularly <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, being the most isolated pathogen in both institutions (∼39.96%). In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, with a higher proportion of these pathogens being multi-resistant strains. A significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.007), indicating that individuals with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of Gram-positive infections (88.46%), whereas obese and overweight patients had higher proportions of Gram-negative infections (23.53% and 28.89%, respectively). In addition, smoking status was also significantly associated with pathogen distribution (<i>p</i> = 0.032), with active and past smokers being related to higher percentages of polymicrobial infections. Furthermore, positive prophylactic MSSA/MRSA swabs were significantly more associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections compared to those with negative results (<i>p</i> = <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gram-positive bacteria, especially <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, dominate the microbiological landscape of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) infections. Our findings provide insights into this critical issue, facilitating a more precise choice of empiric antibiotic treatment and prevention strategies. This analysis underscores the necessity for prophylactic protocols and therapeutic approaches tailored to the predominant bacterial groups. Further research is needed to explore long-term trends and resistance mechanisms to improve patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1477023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiology of periprosthetic infections following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery: a multicentric retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, particularly <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, being the most isolated pathogen in both institutions (∼39.96%). In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, with a higher proportion of these pathogens being multi-resistant strains. A significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.007), indicating that individuals with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of Gram-positive infections (88.46%), whereas obese and overweight patients had higher proportions of Gram-negative infections (23.53% and 28.89%, respectively). In addition, smoking status was also significantly associated with pathogen distribution (<i>p</i> = 0.032), with active and past smokers being related to higher percentages of polymicrobial infections. Furthermore, positive prophylactic MSSA/MRSA swabs were significantly more associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections compared to those with negative results (<i>p</i> = <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gram-positive bacteria, especially <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, dominate the microbiological landscape of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) infections. Our findings provide insights into this critical issue, facilitating a more precise choice of empiric antibiotic treatment and prevention strategies. This analysis underscores the necessity for prophylactic protocols and therapeutic approaches tailored to the predominant bacterial groups. Further research is needed to explore long-term trends and resistance mechanisms to improve patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1477023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:植入物乳房再造(IBR)是乳房切除术后最主要的乳房再造技术,细菌感染是影响患者康复和生活质量的重要并发症。以下研究旨在确定乳房假体感染致病菌的微生物学特征,并更加关注革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的比较分析及其表现形式:我们对2018年1月至2024年3月期间在Humanitas研究医院和Istituto Europeo di Oncologia进行假体乳房重建后出现假体周围感染并接受假体移除手术的214名患者进行了回顾性分析:研究显示,革兰氏阳性菌在两家医院中较为普遍,其中葡萄球菌,尤其是金黄色葡萄球菌,是分离出最多的病原体(∼39.96%)。相比之下,革兰氏阴性菌的发病率较低,而且这些病原体中多重耐药菌株的比例较高。观察结果显示,体重指数正常者的革兰氏阳性菌感染率较高(88.46%),而肥胖和超重患者的革兰氏阴性菌感染率较高(分别为 23.53% 和 28.89%),两者之间存在明显差异(p = 0.007)。此外,吸烟状况与病原体分布也有显著相关性(p = 0.032),正在吸烟和既往吸烟者的多微生物感染比例较高。此外,与阴性结果相比,预防性 MSSA/MRSA 拭子阳性结果与金黄色葡萄球菌感染的相关性明显更高(p = 0.032):革兰氏阳性菌,尤其是葡萄球菌,在植入式乳房再造 (IBR) 感染的微生物中占主导地位。我们的研究结果让我们对这一关键问题有了更深入的了解,有助于更准确地选择经验性抗生素治疗和预防策略。这项分析强调了针对主要细菌群制定预防方案和治疗方法的必要性。还需要进一步研究探索长期趋势和耐药机制,以改善患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbiology of periprosthetic infections following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery: a multicentric retrospective study.

Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024.

Results: The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with Staphylococcus species, particularly Staphylococcus aureus, being the most isolated pathogen in both institutions (∼39.96%). In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, with a higher proportion of these pathogens being multi-resistant strains. A significant difference was observed (p = 0.007), indicating that individuals with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of Gram-positive infections (88.46%), whereas obese and overweight patients had higher proportions of Gram-negative infections (23.53% and 28.89%, respectively). In addition, smoking status was also significantly associated with pathogen distribution (p = 0.032), with active and past smokers being related to higher percentages of polymicrobial infections. Furthermore, positive prophylactic MSSA/MRSA swabs were significantly more associated with Staphylococcus aureus infections compared to those with negative results (p = <0.001).

Conclusions: Gram-positive bacteria, especially Staphylococcus species, dominate the microbiological landscape of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) infections. Our findings provide insights into this critical issue, facilitating a more precise choice of empiric antibiotic treatment and prevention strategies. This analysis underscores the necessity for prophylactic protocols and therapeutic approaches tailored to the predominant bacterial groups. Further research is needed to explore long-term trends and resistance mechanisms to improve patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Compare three deep learning-based artificial intelligence models for classification of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter diagnostic study. Ureteroinguinal hernia: an added advantage for laparoscopy in the management of inguinal hernia-a case report. Innovating neurosurgical training: a comprehensive evaluation of a 3D-printed intraventricular neuroendoscopy simulator and systematic review of the literature. Factors affecting the occurrence of maxillary sinus fungus ball. Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma complicated with liver metastasis: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1