NeVa 机械血栓切除装置在急性缺血性脑卒中中的安全性和有效性:系统综述与荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110892
Mohammad Amin Habibi , Mohammad Sina Mirjnani , Saeed Kargar-Soleimanabad , Mohammad Taha Akbari Javar , Maryam Diyanati , Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand , Inka K. Berglar , Adam A. Dmytriw
{"title":"NeVa 机械血栓切除装置在急性缺血性脑卒中中的安全性和有效性:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Amin Habibi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sina Mirjnani ,&nbsp;Saeed Kargar-Soleimanabad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Taha Akbari Javar ,&nbsp;Maryam Diyanati ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand ,&nbsp;Inka K. Berglar ,&nbsp;Adam A. Dmytriw","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent favorable cohort studies on endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke have predominantly utilized NeVa thrombectomy (NeVa<sup>TM)</sup> stent retrievers. We carried out a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this second-generation stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 26 November 2023 and was updated on August 1, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis systematically investigated 11 studies with a total of 805 patients suffering from ischemic stroke. The mean age of participants across the studies ranged from 65 to 77 years with a male preponderance of 50.16 %. While ten studies reported on the etiology of strokes, some studies reported the risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, and previous stroke. The results of our study indicate that the all-hemorrhagic complications rate was 0.32 (95 %CI: 0.18–0.45), while the complete arterial recanalization rate was 0.76 [95 %CI: 0.49–1.04]. The overall recanalization rate was found to be 0.97 [95 %CI: 0.94–1.00]. Moreover, the postoperative hemorrhage rate was 0.28 [95 %CI: 0.14–0.41], while the repeated re-thrombosis rate was 0.01 [95 %CI: −0.01–0.03]. Lastly, the vasospasm rate was calculated to be 0.09 [95 %CI: −0.03–0.21].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NeVa™ is a safe option capable of achieving a high rate of recanalization and functional independence.</div><div>Abbreviations: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; NeVa™, NeVa Thrombectomy; ICH, Intracranial Hemorrhage; mTICI, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; ACA, Anterior Cerebral Artery; MCA, Middle Cerebral Artery; PCA, Posterior Cerebral Artery; ICA, Internal Carotid Artery; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 110892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The safety and efficacy of NeVa mechanical thrombectomy device in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Amin Habibi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sina Mirjnani ,&nbsp;Saeed Kargar-Soleimanabad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Taha Akbari Javar ,&nbsp;Maryam Diyanati ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hussain Ahmadvand ,&nbsp;Inka K. Berglar ,&nbsp;Adam A. Dmytriw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent favorable cohort studies on endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke have predominantly utilized NeVa thrombectomy (NeVa<sup>TM)</sup> stent retrievers. We carried out a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this second-generation stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 26 November 2023 and was updated on August 1, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis systematically investigated 11 studies with a total of 805 patients suffering from ischemic stroke. The mean age of participants across the studies ranged from 65 to 77 years with a male preponderance of 50.16 %. While ten studies reported on the etiology of strokes, some studies reported the risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, and previous stroke. The results of our study indicate that the all-hemorrhagic complications rate was 0.32 (95 %CI: 0.18–0.45), while the complete arterial recanalization rate was 0.76 [95 %CI: 0.49–1.04]. The overall recanalization rate was found to be 0.97 [95 %CI: 0.94–1.00]. Moreover, the postoperative hemorrhage rate was 0.28 [95 %CI: 0.14–0.41], while the repeated re-thrombosis rate was 0.01 [95 %CI: −0.01–0.03]. Lastly, the vasospasm rate was calculated to be 0.09 [95 %CI: −0.03–0.21].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NeVa™ is a safe option capable of achieving a high rate of recanalization and functional independence.</div><div>Abbreviations: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; NeVa™, NeVa Thrombectomy; ICH, Intracranial Hemorrhage; mTICI, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; ACA, Anterior Cerebral Artery; MCA, Middle Cerebral Artery; PCA, Posterior Cerebral Artery; ICA, Internal Carotid Artery; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近关于缺血性卒中血管内治疗的有利队列研究主要使用了 NeVa 血栓切除术(NeVaTM)支架回收器。我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,研究这种第二代支架取出器在急性缺血性卒中患者中的疗效和安全性:我们根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南进行了研究。我们在PubMed、Embase和Scopus等电子数据库中进行了检索,直至2023年11月26日,并于2024年8月1日进行了更新:这项荟萃分析系统地调查了 11 项研究,共涉及 805 名缺血性中风患者。研究参与者的平均年龄在 65 岁至 77 岁之间,男性占 50.16%。虽然有 10 项研究报告了脑卒中的病因,但也有一些研究报告了高血压、血脂异常、糖尿病、冠心病史和既往脑卒中等风险因素。我们的研究结果表明,全出血性并发症发生率为 0.32(95 %CI:0.18-0.45),而动脉完全再通率为 0.76 [95 %CI:0.49-1.04]。总体再通率为 0.97 [95 %CI: 0.94-1.00]。此外,术后出血率为 0.28 [95 %CI:0.14-0.41],而重复再血栓形成率为 0.01 [95 %CI:-0.01-0.03]。最后,血管痉挛率为 0.09 [95 %CI: -0.03-0.21]:NeVa™是一种安全的选择,能够实现较高的再通率和功能独立性:缩写:PRISMA,系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目;PROSPERO,国际系统综述前瞻性注册;NeVa™,NeVa血栓切除术;ICH,颅内出血;mTICI,改良的脑梗塞溶栓治疗;mRS,改良的兰金量表;ACA,大脑前动脉;MCA,大脑中动脉;PCA,大脑后动脉;ICA,颈内动脉;NIHSS,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The safety and efficacy of NeVa mechanical thrombectomy device in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent favorable cohort studies on endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke have predominantly utilized NeVa thrombectomy (NeVaTM) stent retrievers. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of this second-generation stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Method

We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched until 26 November 2023 and was updated on August 1, 2024.

Results

This meta-analysis systematically investigated 11 studies with a total of 805 patients suffering from ischemic stroke. The mean age of participants across the studies ranged from 65 to 77 years with a male preponderance of 50.16 %. While ten studies reported on the etiology of strokes, some studies reported the risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, and previous stroke. The results of our study indicate that the all-hemorrhagic complications rate was 0.32 (95 %CI: 0.18–0.45), while the complete arterial recanalization rate was 0.76 [95 %CI: 0.49–1.04]. The overall recanalization rate was found to be 0.97 [95 %CI: 0.94–1.00]. Moreover, the postoperative hemorrhage rate was 0.28 [95 %CI: 0.14–0.41], while the repeated re-thrombosis rate was 0.01 [95 %CI: −0.01–0.03]. Lastly, the vasospasm rate was calculated to be 0.09 [95 %CI: −0.03–0.21].

Conclusion

NeVa™ is a safe option capable of achieving a high rate of recanalization and functional independence.
Abbreviations: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; NeVa™, NeVa Thrombectomy; ICH, Intracranial Hemorrhage; mTICI, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; ACA, Anterior Cerebral Artery; MCA, Middle Cerebral Artery; PCA, Posterior Cerebral Artery; ICA, Internal Carotid Artery; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
First-in-human experience of a portable electrical drill with smart autostop for bedside external ventricular drain placement Impact of intraoperative MRI on pediatric epilepsy surgery for focal cortical dysplasia Endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary approach to intraorbital intraconal cavernous venous malformation National trends of Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and Vagus Nerve stimulation (VNS) for refractory epilepsy in adult patients: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample based propensity score matched analysis Effect of blood pressure variability on the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1