在单个学术实验室使用单核苷酸多态性方法对产前无细胞脱氧核糖核酸筛查进行首次为期两年的前瞻性审核。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0339
Tachjaree Panchalee, Naravat Poungvarin, Warisa Amornrit, Chutima Yaiyiam, Tuangsit Wataganara
{"title":"在单个学术实验室使用单核苷酸多态性方法对产前无细胞脱氧核糖核酸筛查进行首次为期两年的前瞻性审核。","authors":"Tachjaree Panchalee, Naravat Poungvarin, Warisa Amornrit, Chutima Yaiyiam, Tuangsit Wataganara","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We reported a performance during an implementation of prenatal cell-free (cf) DNA screening using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach in our accredited laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective audit with prompt intervention was set for the processing of 2,502 samples from singleton pregnancy from August 2017 to July 2019. Risks of trisomy 21 (T21), T18, T13, monosomy X (XO), and other sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) were clarified by a proprietary bioinformatics algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laboratory failure occurred in 192 samples (7.7 %) as a result of inadequate sequencing (n=144), fundamental limitation of the testing (n=19), and obvious human error (n=29). Faulty setting of the calibration curve was the most common human error (n=22/29). After a redraw (n=110), 79 (71.8 %) were settled. Overall, 2,389/2,502 samples (95.5 %) were reportable. Thirty-five samples were high-risk for T21 (n=19), T18 (n=5), T13 (n=1), XO (n=3), and other SCAs (n=7), respectively. Positive predictive values calculated from either prenatal confirmatory tests or postnatal findings were 93.8 % (n=16), 100 % (n=4), 50 % (n=2), and 83.3 % (n=6) for T21, T18, XO, and other SCAs, respectively, with high sensitivity and specificity (>99.9 %). Vanishing twin was detected from 1 out of 4 samples with detected additional haplotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An overall performance of SNP-based prenatal cf-DNA screening during our initial implementation can be optimized with proactive approach. The technical know-how was a significant limiting factor for adopting the technology. The lessons learnt may be of interest to the academic laboratory considering adopting their own test instead of sending blood to a testing service of a supplier.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first 2-year prospective audit of prenatal cell-free deoxyribonucleic screening using single nucleotide polymorphisms approach in a single academic laboratory.\",\"authors\":\"Tachjaree Panchalee, Naravat Poungvarin, Warisa Amornrit, Chutima Yaiyiam, Tuangsit Wataganara\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2024-0339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We reported a performance during an implementation of prenatal cell-free (cf) DNA screening using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach in our accredited laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective audit with prompt intervention was set for the processing of 2,502 samples from singleton pregnancy from August 2017 to July 2019. Risks of trisomy 21 (T21), T18, T13, monosomy X (XO), and other sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) were clarified by a proprietary bioinformatics algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laboratory failure occurred in 192 samples (7.7 %) as a result of inadequate sequencing (n=144), fundamental limitation of the testing (n=19), and obvious human error (n=29). Faulty setting of the calibration curve was the most common human error (n=22/29). After a redraw (n=110), 79 (71.8 %) were settled. Overall, 2,389/2,502 samples (95.5 %) were reportable. Thirty-five samples were high-risk for T21 (n=19), T18 (n=5), T13 (n=1), XO (n=3), and other SCAs (n=7), respectively. Positive predictive values calculated from either prenatal confirmatory tests or postnatal findings were 93.8 % (n=16), 100 % (n=4), 50 % (n=2), and 83.3 % (n=6) for T21, T18, XO, and other SCAs, respectively, with high sensitivity and specificity (>99.9 %). Vanishing twin was detected from 1 out of 4 samples with detected additional haplotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An overall performance of SNP-based prenatal cf-DNA screening during our initial implementation can be optimized with proactive approach. The technical know-how was a significant limiting factor for adopting the technology. The lessons learnt may be of interest to the academic laboratory considering adopting their own test instead of sending blood to a testing service of a supplier.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们报告了在我们的认可实验室使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)方法实施产前无细胞(cf)DNA筛查期间的表现:从 2017 年 8 月到 2019 年 7 月,对 2502 份来自单胎妊娠的样本进行了及时干预的前瞻性审核。通过专有的生物信息学算法明确了21三体(T21)、T18、T13、X单体(XO)和其他性染色体非整倍体(SCA)的风险:由于测序不足(144 例)、检测的基本限制(19 例)和明显的人为错误(29 例),192 例样本(7.7%)出现了实验室失败。校准曲线设置错误是最常见的人为错误(n=22/29)。经过重新绘制(n=110)后,79 项(71.8%)得到解决。总体而言,2,389/2,502 个样本(95.5%)符合报告要求。35个样本分别为T21(n=19)、T18(n=5)、T13(n=1)、XO(n=3)和其他SCA(n=7)的高风险样本。根据产前确诊检查或产后结果计算出的阳性预测值,T21、T18、XO 和其他 SCAs 的阳性预测值分别为 93.8%(16 例)、100%(4 例)、50%(2 例)和 83.3%(6 例),具有较高的敏感性和特异性(>99.9%)。在检测到额外单倍型的 4 个样本中,有 1 个样本检测到消失的双胞胎:结论:在我们最初实施基于 SNP 的产前 cf-DNA 筛查的过程中,可以通过积极主动的方法优化其整体性能。技术诀窍是限制采用该技术的一个重要因素。学术实验室在考虑采用自己的检测方法而不是将血液送到供应商的检测服务机构时,可能会对所学到的经验教训感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The first 2-year prospective audit of prenatal cell-free deoxyribonucleic screening using single nucleotide polymorphisms approach in a single academic laboratory.

Objectives: We reported a performance during an implementation of prenatal cell-free (cf) DNA screening using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach in our accredited laboratory.

Methods: Prospective audit with prompt intervention was set for the processing of 2,502 samples from singleton pregnancy from August 2017 to July 2019. Risks of trisomy 21 (T21), T18, T13, monosomy X (XO), and other sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) were clarified by a proprietary bioinformatics algorithm.

Results: Laboratory failure occurred in 192 samples (7.7 %) as a result of inadequate sequencing (n=144), fundamental limitation of the testing (n=19), and obvious human error (n=29). Faulty setting of the calibration curve was the most common human error (n=22/29). After a redraw (n=110), 79 (71.8 %) were settled. Overall, 2,389/2,502 samples (95.5 %) were reportable. Thirty-five samples were high-risk for T21 (n=19), T18 (n=5), T13 (n=1), XO (n=3), and other SCAs (n=7), respectively. Positive predictive values calculated from either prenatal confirmatory tests or postnatal findings were 93.8 % (n=16), 100 % (n=4), 50 % (n=2), and 83.3 % (n=6) for T21, T18, XO, and other SCAs, respectively, with high sensitivity and specificity (>99.9 %). Vanishing twin was detected from 1 out of 4 samples with detected additional haplotypes.

Conclusions: An overall performance of SNP-based prenatal cf-DNA screening during our initial implementation can be optimized with proactive approach. The technical know-how was a significant limiting factor for adopting the technology. The lessons learnt may be of interest to the academic laboratory considering adopting their own test instead of sending blood to a testing service of a supplier.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1