有牙周炎史和无牙周炎史患者的种植治疗效果:前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾与 Meta 分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of periodontal research Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/jre.13351
Marco Annunziata, Gennaro Cecoro, Agostino Guida, Gaetano Isola, Paolo Pesce, Roberto Sorrentino, Massimo Del Fabbro, Luigi Guida
{"title":"有牙周炎史和无牙周炎史患者的种植治疗效果:前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾与 Meta 分析。","authors":"Marco Annunziata, Gennaro Cecoro, Agostino Guida, Gaetano Isola, Paolo Pesce, Roberto Sorrentino, Massimo Del Fabbro, Luigi Guida","doi":"10.1111/jre.13351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of implant therapy in patients with and without a history of periodontitis in terms of implant loss, peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), and occurrence of peri-implant diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of the present meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021264980). An electronic search was conducted up to April 2024. All prospective cohort studies reporting implant loss, MBL, and occurrence of peri-implant diseases in both patients with a history of periodontitis (HP) and patients with no history of periodontitis (NHP) after at least 36-month follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the quality of the evidence was also assessed. A meta-analysis was performed on the selected outcomes at the available follow-up time points. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up time, rate of progression and severity of periodontitis, and implant surface characteristics. Publication bias was evaluated using the Funnel plot and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 13 761 initial records, 14 studies (17 articles) were finally included. Eight studies had a low risk of bias level, and six had a medium risk of bias level. Meta-analysis showed that HP patients had a significantly greater risk for implant loss (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.28-2.40; p = 0.0005; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), MBL (MD: 0.41 mm; 95% CI 0.19, 0.63; p = 0.0002; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%), and peri-implantitis (3.24; 95% CI: 1.58-6.64; p = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 57%) compared to NHP, whereas no significant intergroup difference for peri-implant mucositis was found. Subgroup analyses revealed a particularly greater risk for implant loss for HP patients over a ≥ 10-year follow-up (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.06-3.85; p = 0.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and for patients with a history of grade C (formerly aggressive) periodontitis (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.01; p < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). A greater risk for implant loss for stages III-IV (severe) periodontitis, and implants with rough surfaces was also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limits of heterogeneous case definitions and methods of assessment, a history of periodontitis has been proved to significantly increase the risk for implant loss, particularly at long follow-up (≥ 10 years) and in case of rapidly progressive forms (grade C), and for MBL and peri-implantitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Implant Therapy in Patients With and Without a History of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Annunziata, Gennaro Cecoro, Agostino Guida, Gaetano Isola, Paolo Pesce, Roberto Sorrentino, Massimo Del Fabbro, Luigi Guida\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jre.13351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of implant therapy in patients with and without a history of periodontitis in terms of implant loss, peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), and occurrence of peri-implant diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of the present meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021264980). An electronic search was conducted up to April 2024. All prospective cohort studies reporting implant loss, MBL, and occurrence of peri-implant diseases in both patients with a history of periodontitis (HP) and patients with no history of periodontitis (NHP) after at least 36-month follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the quality of the evidence was also assessed. A meta-analysis was performed on the selected outcomes at the available follow-up time points. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up time, rate of progression and severity of periodontitis, and implant surface characteristics. Publication bias was evaluated using the Funnel plot and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 13 761 initial records, 14 studies (17 articles) were finally included. Eight studies had a low risk of bias level, and six had a medium risk of bias level. Meta-analysis showed that HP patients had a significantly greater risk for implant loss (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.28-2.40; p = 0.0005; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), MBL (MD: 0.41 mm; 95% CI 0.19, 0.63; p = 0.0002; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%), and peri-implantitis (3.24; 95% CI: 1.58-6.64; p = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 57%) compared to NHP, whereas no significant intergroup difference for peri-implant mucositis was found. Subgroup analyses revealed a particularly greater risk for implant loss for HP patients over a ≥ 10-year follow-up (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.06-3.85; p = 0.03; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and for patients with a history of grade C (formerly aggressive) periodontitis (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.01; p < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). A greater risk for implant loss for stages III-IV (severe) periodontitis, and implants with rough surfaces was also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limits of heterogeneous case definitions and methods of assessment, a history of periodontitis has been proved to significantly increase the risk for implant loss, particularly at long follow-up (≥ 10 years) and in case of rapidly progressive forms (grade C), and for MBL and peri-implantitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述从种植体缺失、种植体周围边缘骨缺失(MBL)和种植体周围疾病的发生等方面,探讨了对有牙周炎病史和无牙周炎病史的患者进行种植治疗的有效性:本荟萃分析的方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42021264980)上注册。电子检索截至 2024 年 4 月。纳入了所有前瞻性队列研究,这些研究报告了至少 36 个月随访后,有牙周炎病史(HP)患者和无牙周炎病史(NHP)患者的种植体脱落、MBL 和种植体周围疾病的发生情况。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估了偏倚风险,并对证据质量进行了评估。在可用的随访时间点对所选结果进行了荟萃分析。根据随访时间、牙周炎进展率和严重程度以及种植体表面特征进行了分组分析。使用漏斗图和 Egger 检验对发表偏倚进行了评估:从 13 761 份初始记录中,最终纳入了 14 项研究(17 篇文章)。其中 8 项研究的偏倚风险较低,6 项研究的偏倚风险中等。Meta 分析显示,HP 患者种植体脱落(HR:1.75;95% CI:1.28-2.40;P = 0.0005;I2 = 0%)、MBL(MD:0.41 mm;95% CI 0.19,0.63;P = 0.0002;I2 = 54%)和种植体周围炎(3.24;95% CI:1.58-6.64;p = 0.001;I2 = 57%),而种植体周围粘膜炎没有发现显著的组间差异。亚组分析显示,HP 患者在≥ 10 年的随访中种植体脱落的风险尤其大(HR:2.02;95% CI:1.06-3.85;P = 0.03;I2 = 0%),而有 C 级(以前为侵袭性)牙周炎病史的患者种植体脱落的风险更大(HR:6.16;95% CI:2.53-15.01;P 2 = 0%)。研究还发现,III-IV期(严重)牙周炎和表面粗糙的种植体的种植体脱落风险更大:结论:在不同病例定义和评估方法的限制下,牙周炎病史已被证明会显著增加种植体脱落的风险,尤其是在长期随访(≥ 10 年)、快速进展型牙周炎(C 级)以及 MBL 和种植体周围炎的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Implant Therapy in Patients With and Without a History of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Aim: This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of implant therapy in patients with and without a history of periodontitis in terms of implant loss, peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), and occurrence of peri-implant diseases.

Methods: The protocol of the present meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021264980). An electronic search was conducted up to April 2024. All prospective cohort studies reporting implant loss, MBL, and occurrence of peri-implant diseases in both patients with a history of periodontitis (HP) and patients with no history of periodontitis (NHP) after at least 36-month follow-up were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the quality of the evidence was also assessed. A meta-analysis was performed on the selected outcomes at the available follow-up time points. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up time, rate of progression and severity of periodontitis, and implant surface characteristics. Publication bias was evaluated using the Funnel plot and Egger's test.

Results: From 13 761 initial records, 14 studies (17 articles) were finally included. Eight studies had a low risk of bias level, and six had a medium risk of bias level. Meta-analysis showed that HP patients had a significantly greater risk for implant loss (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.28-2.40; p = 0.0005; I2 = 0%), MBL (MD: 0.41 mm; 95% CI 0.19, 0.63; p = 0.0002; I2 = 54%), and peri-implantitis (3.24; 95% CI: 1.58-6.64; p = 0.001; I2 = 57%) compared to NHP, whereas no significant intergroup difference for peri-implant mucositis was found. Subgroup analyses revealed a particularly greater risk for implant loss for HP patients over a ≥ 10-year follow-up (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.06-3.85; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%) and for patients with a history of grade C (formerly aggressive) periodontitis (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.01; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). A greater risk for implant loss for stages III-IV (severe) periodontitis, and implants with rough surfaces was also found.

Conclusions: Within the limits of heterogeneous case definitions and methods of assessment, a history of periodontitis has been proved to significantly increase the risk for implant loss, particularly at long follow-up (≥ 10 years) and in case of rapidly progressive forms (grade C), and for MBL and peri-implantitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of periodontal research
Journal of periodontal research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published. One volume of six issues is published annually.
期刊最新文献
Hyperglycemia Exacerbates Periodontal Destruction via Systemic Suppression of Regulatory T Cell Number and Function. Severe Periodontitis is Associated With Recurrent Cardiovascular Events-A 10-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study. Mesaconate from Bacillus subtilis R0179 Supernatant Attenuates Periodontitis by Inhibiting Porphyromonas gingivalis in Mice. Particulate Matter 2.5 and Severe Periodontitis Among Colombian Adults. Assessment Tools for Masticatory Function in Periodontitis Patients: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1