促进气管造口术家庭护理的资源和护理人员赋权(BREATHE)研究:分层随机试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08522-x
Karen Sepucha, Kevin Callans, Lauren Leavitt, Yuchiao Chang, Ha Vo, Matthew Brigger, Stacey Broughton, Jennifer Cahill, Siva Chinnadurai, Janet Germann, Teresa Giordano, Hanna Greenlick-Michals, Luv Javia, Asitha D L Jayawardena, Jeffery Osthimer, Rosemary Chandy Patel, Andrew Redmann, Sergei Roumiantsev, Leigh Simmons, Matthew Smith, Michelle Tate, Mollie Warren, Kimberly Whalen, Phoebe Yager, Habib Zalzal, Christopher Hartnick
{"title":"促进气管造口术家庭护理的资源和护理人员赋权(BREATHE)研究:分层随机试验的研究方案。","authors":"Karen Sepucha, Kevin Callans, Lauren Leavitt, Yuchiao Chang, Ha Vo, Matthew Brigger, Stacey Broughton, Jennifer Cahill, Siva Chinnadurai, Janet Germann, Teresa Giordano, Hanna Greenlick-Michals, Luv Javia, Asitha D L Jayawardena, Jeffery Osthimer, Rosemary Chandy Patel, Andrew Redmann, Sergei Roumiantsev, Leigh Simmons, Matthew Smith, Michelle Tate, Mollie Warren, Kimberly Whalen, Phoebe Yager, Habib Zalzal, Christopher Hartnick","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08522-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Annually, about 4000 US children undergo a tracheostomy procedure to provide a functional, safe airway. In the hospital, qualified staff monitor and address problems, but post-discharge this responsibility shifts entirely to caregivers. The stress and constant demands of caregiving for a child with a tracheostomy with or without ventilator negatively affect caregivers. The aims of the study are to relieve the burden and stress experienced by caregivers at home, improve safety and outcomes for children post-discharge, and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of comprehensive pediatric discharge programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Boosting REsources and cAregiver empowerment for Tracheostomy care at HomE (BREATHE Study) is a pragmatic two-arm, randomized trial with six sites across the US. Caregivers of a child with a tracheostomy are randomized to comparator (\"Trach Me Home\") or intervention (\"Trach Plus\"). The Comparator arm is the current gold standard focusing on caregiver education, technical skill building, and case management. The Intervention arm contains all elements of the Comparator plus educational resources, social support and communication with the outpatient pediatrician. Caregivers will complete three surveys: baseline (pre-discharge), 4-week and 6-month post-discharge. Outpatient pediatricians will complete a survey to assess self-confidence in caring for a child with tracheostomy and satisfaction with discharge communication. Interviews with clinicians and staff will identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. The study will examine whether the Intervention arm leads to lower caregiver burden, lower readmission rates and higher pediatrician satisfaction than Comparator arm.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BREATHE Study will advance our understanding of how hospitals can support caregivers with a child with a tracheostomy as they resume life, work, and family activities after discharge.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06283953). February 28, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting REsources And caregiver empowerment for Tracheostomy care at HomE (BREATHE) Study: study protocol for a stratified randomization trial.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Sepucha, Kevin Callans, Lauren Leavitt, Yuchiao Chang, Ha Vo, Matthew Brigger, Stacey Broughton, Jennifer Cahill, Siva Chinnadurai, Janet Germann, Teresa Giordano, Hanna Greenlick-Michals, Luv Javia, Asitha D L Jayawardena, Jeffery Osthimer, Rosemary Chandy Patel, Andrew Redmann, Sergei Roumiantsev, Leigh Simmons, Matthew Smith, Michelle Tate, Mollie Warren, Kimberly Whalen, Phoebe Yager, Habib Zalzal, Christopher Hartnick\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08522-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Annually, about 4000 US children undergo a tracheostomy procedure to provide a functional, safe airway. In the hospital, qualified staff monitor and address problems, but post-discharge this responsibility shifts entirely to caregivers. The stress and constant demands of caregiving for a child with a tracheostomy with or without ventilator negatively affect caregivers. The aims of the study are to relieve the burden and stress experienced by caregivers at home, improve safety and outcomes for children post-discharge, and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of comprehensive pediatric discharge programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Boosting REsources and cAregiver empowerment for Tracheostomy care at HomE (BREATHE Study) is a pragmatic two-arm, randomized trial with six sites across the US. Caregivers of a child with a tracheostomy are randomized to comparator (\\\"Trach Me Home\\\") or intervention (\\\"Trach Plus\\\"). The Comparator arm is the current gold standard focusing on caregiver education, technical skill building, and case management. The Intervention arm contains all elements of the Comparator plus educational resources, social support and communication with the outpatient pediatrician. Caregivers will complete three surveys: baseline (pre-discharge), 4-week and 6-month post-discharge. Outpatient pediatricians will complete a survey to assess self-confidence in caring for a child with tracheostomy and satisfaction with discharge communication. Interviews with clinicians and staff will identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. The study will examine whether the Intervention arm leads to lower caregiver burden, lower readmission rates and higher pediatrician satisfaction than Comparator arm.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BREATHE Study will advance our understanding of how hospitals can support caregivers with a child with a tracheostomy as they resume life, work, and family activities after discharge.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06283953). February 28, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08522-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08522-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每年约有 4000 名美国儿童接受气管造口术,以提供功能性安全气道。在医院里,合格的医护人员会对患儿进行监护并解决问题,但出院后这一责任就完全转移到了护理人员身上。无论是否使用呼吸机,护理气管切开术患儿的压力和持续需求都会对护理人员产生负面影响。这项研究的目的是减轻护理人员在家中的负担和压力,改善儿童出院后的安全和治疗效果,并找出实施综合性儿科出院计划的促进因素和障碍:促进气管造口术护理的资源和护理人员赋权(BREATHE 研究)是一项务实的双臂随机试验,在全美六个地点进行。气管造口患儿的护理人员被随机分配到参照组("Trach Me Home")或干预组("Trach Plus")。参照组是目前的黄金标准,侧重于护理人员的教育、技术技能培养和个案管理。干预组包含对照组的所有内容,外加教育资源、社会支持以及与门诊儿科医生的沟通。护理人员将完成三项调查:基线(出院前)、出院后 4 周和 6 个月。门诊儿科医生将完成一项调查,以评估护理气管造口术患儿的自信心以及对出院沟通的满意度。与临床医生和工作人员的访谈将确定实施的促进因素和障碍。该研究将考察干预组与对照组相比是否能减轻护理人员的负担、降低再入院率并提高儿科医生的满意度:BREATHE研究将促进我们对医院如何支持气管造口患儿护理人员在出院后恢复生活、工作和家庭活动的理解:试验注册:已在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT06283953)。2024 年 2 月 28 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boosting REsources And caregiver empowerment for Tracheostomy care at HomE (BREATHE) Study: study protocol for a stratified randomization trial.

Background: Annually, about 4000 US children undergo a tracheostomy procedure to provide a functional, safe airway. In the hospital, qualified staff monitor and address problems, but post-discharge this responsibility shifts entirely to caregivers. The stress and constant demands of caregiving for a child with a tracheostomy with or without ventilator negatively affect caregivers. The aims of the study are to relieve the burden and stress experienced by caregivers at home, improve safety and outcomes for children post-discharge, and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of comprehensive pediatric discharge programs.

Methods: The Boosting REsources and cAregiver empowerment for Tracheostomy care at HomE (BREATHE Study) is a pragmatic two-arm, randomized trial with six sites across the US. Caregivers of a child with a tracheostomy are randomized to comparator ("Trach Me Home") or intervention ("Trach Plus"). The Comparator arm is the current gold standard focusing on caregiver education, technical skill building, and case management. The Intervention arm contains all elements of the Comparator plus educational resources, social support and communication with the outpatient pediatrician. Caregivers will complete three surveys: baseline (pre-discharge), 4-week and 6-month post-discharge. Outpatient pediatricians will complete a survey to assess self-confidence in caring for a child with tracheostomy and satisfaction with discharge communication. Interviews with clinicians and staff will identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. The study will examine whether the Intervention arm leads to lower caregiver burden, lower readmission rates and higher pediatrician satisfaction than Comparator arm.

Discussion: The BREATHE Study will advance our understanding of how hospitals can support caregivers with a child with a tracheostomy as they resume life, work, and family activities after discharge.

Trial registration: Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06283953). February 28, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
High-concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus placebo in osteoarthritis in the thumb base: study protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Care bundles to improve enteral nutrition management in stroke patients: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}. Influenza vaccination in patients with acute heart failure (PANDA II): study protocol for a hospital-based, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial in China. Intracoronary administration of tenecteplase to prevent PCI-related myocardial infarction in patients with echo-attenuated coronary plaques: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1