快速反应前的儿科预警评分对重症监护室转院的预测效果不佳。

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864
Jimin Lee, Jennifer L Ciuchta, Jacqueline Weingarten-Arams, Kaitlyn Philips
{"title":"快速反应前的儿科预警评分对重症监护室转院的预测效果不佳。","authors":"Jimin Lee, Jennifer L Ciuchta, Jacqueline Weingarten-Arams, Kaitlyn Philips","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) is a clinical tool used to identify children at risk for clinical deterioration, but its utility remains debated, particularly in high-resource settings. Our objective with this study was to assess the predictive performance of the PEWS for unplanned PICU transfers after pediatric rapid response team (RRT) activation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic children's hospital included all hospitalized patients up to 21 years old who had RRT activations between August 2021 and July 2022. Demographic and clinical data, the primary reason for RRT activation, and the modified Brighton PEWS were collected. The primary outcome was PICU transfer following RRT activation, and the secondary outcome was rapid escalation of care within 4 hours after RRT activation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated at multiple PEWS thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 RRT activations in 244 patients, 183 (63%) resulted in a PICU transfer, 75% of which were due to respiratory concerns. The PEWS was recorded in 89% of RRT activations within the preceding 4 hours. There was no significant difference in the PEWS between patients with or without PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of PEWS for predicting PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care were low (AUROC 0.495-0.613).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEWS within 4 hours before RRT activation was a poor predictor of PICU transfer or rapid escalation care. Further work is needed to develop a more sensitive and specific tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"945-951"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Early Warning Scores Before Rapid Response Poorly Predict Intensive Care Unit Transfers.\",\"authors\":\"Jimin Lee, Jennifer L Ciuchta, Jacqueline Weingarten-Arams, Kaitlyn Philips\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) is a clinical tool used to identify children at risk for clinical deterioration, but its utility remains debated, particularly in high-resource settings. Our objective with this study was to assess the predictive performance of the PEWS for unplanned PICU transfers after pediatric rapid response team (RRT) activation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic children's hospital included all hospitalized patients up to 21 years old who had RRT activations between August 2021 and July 2022. Demographic and clinical data, the primary reason for RRT activation, and the modified Brighton PEWS were collected. The primary outcome was PICU transfer following RRT activation, and the secondary outcome was rapid escalation of care within 4 hours after RRT activation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated at multiple PEWS thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 RRT activations in 244 patients, 183 (63%) resulted in a PICU transfer, 75% of which were due to respiratory concerns. The PEWS was recorded in 89% of RRT activations within the preceding 4 hours. There was no significant difference in the PEWS between patients with or without PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of PEWS for predicting PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care were low (AUROC 0.495-0.613).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEWS within 4 hours before RRT activation was a poor predictor of PICU transfer or rapid escalation care. Further work is needed to develop a more sensitive and specific tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"945-951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)是一种用于识别有临床恶化风险的儿童的临床工具,但其实用性仍存在争议,尤其是在高资源环境中。本研究旨在评估 PEWS 对儿科快速反应小组(RRT)启动后 PICU 意外转院的预测性能:方法:在一家三级医疗学术儿童医院开展的一项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 7 月期间启动 RRT 的所有 21 岁以下住院患者。研究收集了人口统计学和临床数据、启动 RRT 的主要原因以及修改后的布莱顿 PEWS。主要结果是 RRT 启动后转入 PICU,次要结果是 RRT 启动后 4 小时内的快速护理升级。在多个PEWS阈值下计算灵敏度、特异性和接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC):结果:在 244 名患者的 297 次 RRT 启动中,183 次(63%)导致转入 PICU,其中 75% 是由于呼吸系统问题。89%的 RRT 启动都记录了前 4 小时内的 PEWS。在转入 PICU 或未转入 PICU 或未快速升级护理的患者之间,PEWS 没有明显差异。PEWS预测PICU转院或快速护理升级的灵敏度、特异性和AUROC均较低(AUROC为0.495-0.613):结论:RRT 启动前 4 小时内的 PEWS 是 PICU 转院或快速升级护理的不良预测指标。需要进一步努力开发一种更灵敏、更具特异性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatric Early Warning Scores Before Rapid Response Poorly Predict Intensive Care Unit Transfers.

Background: The Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) is a clinical tool used to identify children at risk for clinical deterioration, but its utility remains debated, particularly in high-resource settings. Our objective with this study was to assess the predictive performance of the PEWS for unplanned PICU transfers after pediatric rapid response team (RRT) activation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic children's hospital included all hospitalized patients up to 21 years old who had RRT activations between August 2021 and July 2022. Demographic and clinical data, the primary reason for RRT activation, and the modified Brighton PEWS were collected. The primary outcome was PICU transfer following RRT activation, and the secondary outcome was rapid escalation of care within 4 hours after RRT activation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated at multiple PEWS thresholds.

Results: Of 297 RRT activations in 244 patients, 183 (63%) resulted in a PICU transfer, 75% of which were due to respiratory concerns. The PEWS was recorded in 89% of RRT activations within the preceding 4 hours. There was no significant difference in the PEWS between patients with or without PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of PEWS for predicting PICU transfer or rapid escalation of care were low (AUROC 0.495-0.613).

Conclusions: PEWS within 4 hours before RRT activation was a poor predictor of PICU transfer or rapid escalation care. Further work is needed to develop a more sensitive and specific tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
Testing and Treatment Thresholds for Pediatric Pneumonia in the Emergency Department. It's More Complicated Than Interpreter Use: Improving Care for Non-English-Speaking Families. Factors Associated With Nirsevimab Uptake in Healthy Newborns. Nirsevimab Administration During the Birth Hospitalization. Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1