探索药理学靶点介导的低血浆暴露对药物发现中铅化合物选择的影响--一种建模方法。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1208/s12248-024-00979-7
Min Xu, Duxin Sun, Guohua An
{"title":"探索药理学靶点介导的低血浆暴露对药物发现中铅化合物选择的影响--一种建模方法。","authors":"Min Xu, Duxin Sun, Guohua An","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00979-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small-molecule drug development faces the challenge of low success rate. In this paper, we propose one potential cause that may occur in the preclinical phase and has rarely been brought up before - the neglected target-mediated low plasma exposure, and the subsequent lead compound mis-selection due to conventional pharmacokinetic criteria requiring sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life. To evaluate the concept of target-mediate low plasma exposure, we established a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to evaluate the concentration-time profiles of a group of virtual lead series analogs in plasma and in tissues with and without pharmacological target expression. Simulation results demonstrated that the candidate with the highest target binding has the lowest plasma exposure due to target-mediated tissue retention. The traditional PK criteria, such as the requirement of sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life, may potentially result in lead compound mis-selection by discarding the appropriate and best candidate(s). The mPBPK model was partially validated using 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on our in-house PK and tissue distribution data obtained in animals. The association rate constant (K<sub>ass</sub>) was estimated to be 49.8 h<sup>-1</sup>, 31.4 h<sup>-1</sup>, 8.58 h<sup>-1</sup>, and 1.91 h<sup>-1</sup> for afatinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, and sorafenib, respectively. Among these four model drugs, a strong correlation was observed between their K<sub>ass</sub> values and AUC<sub>high-perfused tissue</sub> /AUC<sub>plasma</sub> ratios, a metric of tissue retention. Our mPBPK modeling and simulation results indicated that the concept of target-mediated low plasma exposure should be kept in mind during the lead compound selection process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"26 6","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Impact of Pharmacological Target-Mediated Low Plasma Exposure in Lead Compound Selection in Drug Discovery - A Modeling Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Min Xu, Duxin Sun, Guohua An\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-024-00979-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Small-molecule drug development faces the challenge of low success rate. In this paper, we propose one potential cause that may occur in the preclinical phase and has rarely been brought up before - the neglected target-mediated low plasma exposure, and the subsequent lead compound mis-selection due to conventional pharmacokinetic criteria requiring sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life. To evaluate the concept of target-mediate low plasma exposure, we established a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to evaluate the concentration-time profiles of a group of virtual lead series analogs in plasma and in tissues with and without pharmacological target expression. Simulation results demonstrated that the candidate with the highest target binding has the lowest plasma exposure due to target-mediated tissue retention. The traditional PK criteria, such as the requirement of sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life, may potentially result in lead compound mis-selection by discarding the appropriate and best candidate(s). The mPBPK model was partially validated using 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on our in-house PK and tissue distribution data obtained in animals. The association rate constant (K<sub>ass</sub>) was estimated to be 49.8 h<sup>-1</sup>, 31.4 h<sup>-1</sup>, 8.58 h<sup>-1</sup>, and 1.91 h<sup>-1</sup> for afatinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, and sorafenib, respectively. Among these four model drugs, a strong correlation was observed between their K<sub>ass</sub> values and AUC<sub>high-perfused tissue</sub> /AUC<sub>plasma</sub> ratios, a metric of tissue retention. Our mPBPK modeling and simulation results indicated that the concept of target-mediated low plasma exposure should be kept in mind during the lead compound selection process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00979-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00979-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小分子药物开发面临着成功率低的挑战。在本文中,我们提出了一个可能发生在临床前阶段的潜在原因,该原因以前很少被提及--被忽视的靶点介导的低血浆暴露,以及随后由于传统药代动力学标准要求足够的血浆暴露和理想的半衰期而导致的先导化合物误选。为了评估靶点介导的低血浆暴露这一概念,我们建立了一个基于生理学的最小药代动力学(mPBPK)模型,以评估一组虚拟先导系列类似物在血浆中以及在有药理靶点表达和无药理靶点表达的组织中的浓度-时间曲线。模拟结果表明,由于靶点介导的组织滞留,靶点结合率最高的候选药物的血浆暴露量最低。传统的 PK 标准,如要求足够的血浆暴露量和理想的半衰期,可能会导致先导化合物的错误选择,从而放弃合适的最佳候选化合物。根据我们在动物体内获得的内部 PK 和组织分布数据,使用 4 种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对 mPBPK 模型进行了部分验证。据估计,阿法替尼、达沙替尼、吉非替尼和索拉非尼的关联速率常数(Kass)分别为 49.8 h-1、31.4 h-1、8.58 h-1 和 1.91 h-1。在这四种模型药物中,观察到它们的Kass值与AUChigh-灌注组织/AUC血浆比值(一种组织滞留指标)之间存在很强的相关性。我们的 mPBPK 建模和模拟结果表明,在选择先导化合物的过程中应牢记靶点介导的低血浆暴露这一概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Impact of Pharmacological Target-Mediated Low Plasma Exposure in Lead Compound Selection in Drug Discovery - A Modeling Approach.

Small-molecule drug development faces the challenge of low success rate. In this paper, we propose one potential cause that may occur in the preclinical phase and has rarely been brought up before - the neglected target-mediated low plasma exposure, and the subsequent lead compound mis-selection due to conventional pharmacokinetic criteria requiring sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life. To evaluate the concept of target-mediate low plasma exposure, we established a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to evaluate the concentration-time profiles of a group of virtual lead series analogs in plasma and in tissues with and without pharmacological target expression. Simulation results demonstrated that the candidate with the highest target binding has the lowest plasma exposure due to target-mediated tissue retention. The traditional PK criteria, such as the requirement of sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life, may potentially result in lead compound mis-selection by discarding the appropriate and best candidate(s). The mPBPK model was partially validated using 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on our in-house PK and tissue distribution data obtained in animals. The association rate constant (Kass) was estimated to be 49.8 h-1, 31.4 h-1, 8.58 h-1, and 1.91 h-1 for afatinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, and sorafenib, respectively. Among these four model drugs, a strong correlation was observed between their Kass values and AUChigh-perfused tissue /AUCplasma ratios, a metric of tissue retention. Our mPBPK modeling and simulation results indicated that the concept of target-mediated low plasma exposure should be kept in mind during the lead compound selection process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Development of Solidified Self-microemulsifying Delivery Systems Containing Tacrolimus for Enhanced Dissolution and Pharmacokinetic Profile. Exploring the Correlation between LC-MS Multi-Attribute Method and Conventional Chromatographic Product Quality Assays through Multivariate Data Analysis. A Data Driven Strategy for Implementation of Singlicate Analysis in Ligand Binding Assays Used for the Determination of Anti-drug Antibodies to a Multidomain Biotherapeutic. Glycyrrhizic Acid Formulated in Hydrotalcite Nanocarriers Intended to Act as a Hepatoprotective Agent. Possibilities and Limitations in Substituting anti-Drug Antibody Titers with Signal-to-Noise Ratios: A Comprehensive Comparison Using Two Clinical Trial Datasets of Adalimumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1