姑息关怀期刊编委会成员的性别分布:评估性别均等。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1177/08258597241291631
Özcan Ölbeci, Bişar Ergün, Mehmet Nuri Yakar, Volkan Hanci
{"title":"姑息关怀期刊编委会成员的性别分布:评估性别均等。","authors":"Özcan Ölbeci, Bişar Ergün, Mehmet Nuri Yakar, Volkan Hanci","doi":"10.1177/08258597241291631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Although the representation of women in palliative care has improved in recent years, gender inequality still exists in editorial leadership. This study aimed to characterize gender distribution in leadership positions on the editorial boards of palliative care journals. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study analyzed the gender composition of editorial boards for palliative care journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and the factors that affect this composition. Information on the gender of editorial board members was obtained from each journal's website. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1388 editorial board members from 28 palliative care journals were included in the analysis. The data analysis showed that 540 (38.9%) of the editorial board members were women, while 848 (61.1%) were men. Of the 31 editors-in-chief, only 11 (35.5%) were women. Editorial boards of journals classified as social work (OR, 5.92, 95% CI, 2.29-15.30, <i>p </i>< 0.001) and nursing (OR, 4.20, 95% CI, 1.73-10.17, <i>p </i>= 0.001) in WoS coverage were independently associated with gender diversity. There were differences in gender representation between the editorial boards of palliative care journals published in New Zealand (OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29-0.80, <i>p </i>= 0.005), Japan (OR, 0.17, 95% CI, 0.08-0.32, <i>p </i>< 0.001), and those categorized under oncology in WoS coverage (OR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.05-0.89, <i>p </i>= 0.009). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrated that women are underrepresented among editorial board members of palliative care journals. Additional efforts are required to broaden diversity policies in palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"8258597241291631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Distribution of Editorial Board Members in Palliative Care Journals: Assessment of Gender Parity.\",\"authors\":\"Özcan Ölbeci, Bişar Ergün, Mehmet Nuri Yakar, Volkan Hanci\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08258597241291631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Although the representation of women in palliative care has improved in recent years, gender inequality still exists in editorial leadership. This study aimed to characterize gender distribution in leadership positions on the editorial boards of palliative care journals. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study analyzed the gender composition of editorial boards for palliative care journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and the factors that affect this composition. Information on the gender of editorial board members was obtained from each journal's website. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1388 editorial board members from 28 palliative care journals were included in the analysis. The data analysis showed that 540 (38.9%) of the editorial board members were women, while 848 (61.1%) were men. Of the 31 editors-in-chief, only 11 (35.5%) were women. Editorial boards of journals classified as social work (OR, 5.92, 95% CI, 2.29-15.30, <i>p </i>< 0.001) and nursing (OR, 4.20, 95% CI, 1.73-10.17, <i>p </i>= 0.001) in WoS coverage were independently associated with gender diversity. There were differences in gender representation between the editorial boards of palliative care journals published in New Zealand (OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29-0.80, <i>p </i>= 0.005), Japan (OR, 0.17, 95% CI, 0.08-0.32, <i>p </i>< 0.001), and those categorized under oncology in WoS coverage (OR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.05-0.89, <i>p </i>= 0.009). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrated that women are underrepresented among editorial board members of palliative care journals. Additional efforts are required to broaden diversity policies in palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8258597241291631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241291631\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241291631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管近年来女性在姑息关怀领域的代表性有所提高,但在编辑领导层中仍存在性别不平等现象。本研究旨在描述姑息关怀期刊编辑部领导职位的性别分布特征。方法:这项横断面研究分析了科学网(WoS)收录的姑息关怀期刊编委会的性别构成以及影响这一构成的因素。有关编委会成员性别的信息来自各期刊的网站。结果:共有来自 28 种姑息治疗期刊的 1388 名编委会成员参与了分析。数据分析显示,540 名(38.9%)编委为女性,848 名(61.1%)为男性。在 31 位主编中,只有 11 位(35.5%)是女性。在 WoS 覆盖范围中,被归类为社会工作的期刊编委会(OR,5.92,95% CI,2.29-15.30,P = 0.001)与性别多样性有独立关联。在新西兰(OR,0.49,95% CI,0.29-0.80,P = 0.005)和日本(OR,0.17,95% CI,0.08-0.32,P = 0.009)出版的姑息关怀期刊编委会之间的性别代表性存在差异。结论我们的研究结果表明,女性在姑息关怀期刊编委会成员中的代表性不足。需要进一步努力扩大姑息关怀领域的多元化政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Distribution of Editorial Board Members in Palliative Care Journals: Assessment of Gender Parity.

Objective: Although the representation of women in palliative care has improved in recent years, gender inequality still exists in editorial leadership. This study aimed to characterize gender distribution in leadership positions on the editorial boards of palliative care journals. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the gender composition of editorial boards for palliative care journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and the factors that affect this composition. Information on the gender of editorial board members was obtained from each journal's website. Results: A total of 1388 editorial board members from 28 palliative care journals were included in the analysis. The data analysis showed that 540 (38.9%) of the editorial board members were women, while 848 (61.1%) were men. Of the 31 editors-in-chief, only 11 (35.5%) were women. Editorial boards of journals classified as social work (OR, 5.92, 95% CI, 2.29-15.30, p < 0.001) and nursing (OR, 4.20, 95% CI, 1.73-10.17, p = 0.001) in WoS coverage were independently associated with gender diversity. There were differences in gender representation between the editorial boards of palliative care journals published in New Zealand (OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29-0.80, p = 0.005), Japan (OR, 0.17, 95% CI, 0.08-0.32, p < 0.001), and those categorized under oncology in WoS coverage (OR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.05-0.89, p = 0.009). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that women are underrepresented among editorial board members of palliative care journals. Additional efforts are required to broaden diversity policies in palliative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Palliative Care
Journal of Palliative Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Palliative Care is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international and interdisciplinary forum for practical, critical thought on palliative care and palliative medicine. JPC publishes high-quality original research, opinion papers/commentaries, narrative and humanities works, case reports/case series, and reports on international activities and comparative palliative care.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Practice Guidelines on Palliative Sedation Around the World: A Systematic Review. Palliative Care Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit Reduces Hospital Costs: A Cost-Analysis. Caregiving Strain Mediates the Relationship Between Terminally Ill Patient's Physical Symptoms and Their Family Caregivers' Wellbeing: A Multicentered Longitudinal Study. Relatives' Unmet Needs in the Last Year of Life of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Results of a Dutch Prospective, Longitudinal Study (eQuiPe). The Impact of Palliative Care Consultation on Aggressive Medical Interventions in End-of-life Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Insights from the U.S. National Patient Sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1