高分辨率(30 米)烧毁面积产品提高了非洲碳排放估算能力

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1029/2024EF005051
Baoye Qi, Zhaoming Zhang, Tengfei Long, Guojin He, Guizhou Wang, Yan Peng, Zekun Xu
{"title":"高分辨率(30 米)烧毁面积产品提高了非洲碳排放估算能力","authors":"Baoye Qi,&nbsp;Zhaoming Zhang,&nbsp;Tengfei Long,&nbsp;Guojin He,&nbsp;Guizhou Wang,&nbsp;Yan Peng,&nbsp;Zekun Xu","doi":"10.1029/2024EF005051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Fire significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. The current global burned area (BA) products mainly have coarse native spatial resolution, which leads to underestimation of global BA and carbon emissions from biomass burning. Performances of BA products in Africa from GABAM (30 m), MCD64A1 (500 m), GFED4s (0.25°), FireCCI51 (250 m), and GFED5 (0.25°) were compared. From 2014 to 2020, GFED5 detected the most BA, 1.58 times more than GABAM during the same period. GABAM detected 0.09 Mkm<sup>2</sup> more burned area than FireCCI51 on average. From 2014 to 2016, GABAM detected an average of 2.99 Mkm<sup>2</sup> of BA in Africa, which was 1.03 times more than GFED4s. From 2014 to 2021, the average African BA derived from GABAM was 2.89 Mkm<sup>2</sup>, 1.22 times more than MCD64A1. The increase in BA will inevitably lead to an increase in the estimation of carbon emissions from biomass burning. Based on GABAM products and GFED framework, we estimated the average vegetation burning carbon emissions in Africa from 2014 to 2021 to be 1113.25 Tg, which is higher than GFED4s' carbon emissions in the same time period. This shows that the use of high-resolution (30 m) burned area products to estimate carbon emissions can effectively avoid the underestimation of overall fire carbon emissions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Resolution (30 m) Burned Area Product Improves the Ability for Carbon Emission Estimation in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Baoye Qi,&nbsp;Zhaoming Zhang,&nbsp;Tengfei Long,&nbsp;Guojin He,&nbsp;Guizhou Wang,&nbsp;Yan Peng,&nbsp;Zekun Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EF005051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Fire significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. The current global burned area (BA) products mainly have coarse native spatial resolution, which leads to underestimation of global BA and carbon emissions from biomass burning. Performances of BA products in Africa from GABAM (30 m), MCD64A1 (500 m), GFED4s (0.25°), FireCCI51 (250 m), and GFED5 (0.25°) were compared. From 2014 to 2020, GFED5 detected the most BA, 1.58 times more than GABAM during the same period. GABAM detected 0.09 Mkm<sup>2</sup> more burned area than FireCCI51 on average. From 2014 to 2016, GABAM detected an average of 2.99 Mkm<sup>2</sup> of BA in Africa, which was 1.03 times more than GFED4s. From 2014 to 2021, the average African BA derived from GABAM was 2.89 Mkm<sup>2</sup>, 1.22 times more than MCD64A1. The increase in BA will inevitably lead to an increase in the estimation of carbon emissions from biomass burning. Based on GABAM products and GFED framework, we estimated the average vegetation burning carbon emissions in Africa from 2014 to 2021 to be 1113.25 Tg, which is higher than GFED4s' carbon emissions in the same time period. This shows that the use of high-resolution (30 m) burned area products to estimate carbon emissions can effectively avoid the underestimation of overall fire carbon emissions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005051\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005051\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火灾是温室气体排放的重要来源。目前的全球燃烧面积(BA)产品主要具有较粗的本地空间分辨率,这导致低估了生物质燃烧产生的全球燃烧面积和碳排放量。我们比较了来自 GABAM(30 米)、MCD64A1(500 米)、GFED4s(0.25°)、FireCCI51(250 米)和 GFED5(0.25°)的非洲燃烧面积产品的性能。从 2014 年到 2020 年,GFED5 检测到的 BA 最多,是同期 GABAM 的 1.58 倍。GABAM 平均比 FireCCI51 多探测到 0.09 平方公里的烧毁面积。从 2014 年到 2016 年,GABAM 在非洲平均探测到 2.99 平方公里的 BA,是 GFED4 的 1.03 倍。从 2014 年到 2021 年,GABAM 得出的非洲平均 BA 为 2.89 Mkm2,是 MCD64A1 的 1.22 倍。生物质燃烧量的增加必然会导致生物质燃烧碳排放量估算的增加。基于 GABAM 产品和 GFED 框架,我们估算出 2014 至 2021 年非洲植被燃烧的平均碳排放量为 1113.25 Tg,高于 GFED4 的同期碳排放量。这表明,使用高分辨率(30 米)燃烧面积产品估算碳排放量可有效避免低估整体火灾碳排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High Resolution (30 m) Burned Area Product Improves the Ability for Carbon Emission Estimation in Africa

Fire significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. The current global burned area (BA) products mainly have coarse native spatial resolution, which leads to underestimation of global BA and carbon emissions from biomass burning. Performances of BA products in Africa from GABAM (30 m), MCD64A1 (500 m), GFED4s (0.25°), FireCCI51 (250 m), and GFED5 (0.25°) were compared. From 2014 to 2020, GFED5 detected the most BA, 1.58 times more than GABAM during the same period. GABAM detected 0.09 Mkm2 more burned area than FireCCI51 on average. From 2014 to 2016, GABAM detected an average of 2.99 Mkm2 of BA in Africa, which was 1.03 times more than GFED4s. From 2014 to 2021, the average African BA derived from GABAM was 2.89 Mkm2, 1.22 times more than MCD64A1. The increase in BA will inevitably lead to an increase in the estimation of carbon emissions from biomass burning. Based on GABAM products and GFED framework, we estimated the average vegetation burning carbon emissions in Africa from 2014 to 2021 to be 1113.25 Tg, which is higher than GFED4s' carbon emissions in the same time period. This shows that the use of high-resolution (30 m) burned area products to estimate carbon emissions can effectively avoid the underestimation of overall fire carbon emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
期刊最新文献
Effective Adaptation Options to Alleviate Nuisance Flooding in Coastal Megacities—Learning From Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Observations Over a Century Underscore an Increasing Likelihood of Compound Dry-Hot Events in China Response of Global Runoff Components to Rising CO2 Increased Asian Sulfate Aerosol Emissions Remarkably Enhance Sahel Summer Precipitation Consumption-Based Emissions of African Countries: An Analysis of Decoupling Dynamics and Drivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1