公平的 XIDS:确保入侵检测模型的公平性和透明度

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1002/cpe.8268
Chinu, Urvashi Bansal
{"title":"公平的 XIDS:确保入侵检测模型的公平性和透明度","authors":"Chinu,&nbsp;Urvashi Bansal","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fair XIDS: Ensuring fairness and transparency in intrusion detection models\",\"authors\":\"Chinu,&nbsp;Urvashi Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpe.8268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"volume\":\"36 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8268\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵检测系统(IDS)对于检测系统或网络的异常情况和未经授权的访问非常重要。由于这些 IDS 模型的黑箱性质,网络专家需要对系统有更多的信任,才能对警报采取行动,并需要透明度来理解模型的内在逻辑。此外,有偏见的模型决策会影响模型性能,增加误报率,直接影响模型的准确性。因此,在 IDS 模型中同时保持透明度和公平性对准确决策至关重要。现有方法面临着公平性和准确性之间权衡的挑战,这也影响了模型的可靠性和鲁棒性。基于这些研究空白,我们开发了公平-XIDS 模型。该模型通过可视化解释阐明了其内部逻辑,并在整个生命周期中促进了公平性。Fair-XIDS 模型成功地整合了复杂的透明度和公平性算法,解决了不平衡数据集、算法偏差和后处理偏差等问题,平均降低了 85% 的误报率。为了确保可靠性,所提出的模型有效地降低了准确性和公平性之间的权衡,平均准确性达到 90%,公平性超过 85%。该模型在不同数据集和分类器上的评估结果标志着其与模型无关的特性。总体而言,该模型在不同分类器之间实现了 85% 以上的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fair XIDS: Ensuring fairness and transparency in intrusion detection models

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is valuable for detecting anomalies and unauthorized access to a system or network. Due to the black-box nature of these IDS models, network experts need more trust in systems to act on alerts and transparency to understand the model's inner logic. Moreover, biased models' decisions affect the model performance and increase the false positive rates, directly affecting the model's accuracy. So, maintaining Transparency and Fairness simultaneously in IDS models is essential for accurate decision-making. Existing methods face challenges of the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy, which also affects the reliability and robustness of the model. Motivated by these research gaps, we developed the Fair-XIDS model. This model clarifies its internal logic with visual explanations and promotes fairness across its entire lifecycle. The Fair-XIDS model successfully integrates complex transparency and fairness algorithms to address issues like Imbalanced datasets, algorithmic bias, and postprocessing bias with an average 85% reduction in false positive rate. To ensure reliability, the proposed model effectively mitigates the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness with an average of 90% accuracy and more than 85% fairness. The assessment results of the proposed model over diverse datasets and classifiers mark its model-agnostic nature. Overall, the model achieves more than 85% consistency among diverse classifiers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Improving QoS in cloud resources scheduling using dynamic clustering algorithm and SM-CDC scheduling model Issue Information Issue Information Camellia oleifera trunks detection and identification based on improved YOLOv7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1