Luca Giamattei, Antonio Guerriero, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano Russo
{"title":"软件质量保证中的因果推理:系统回顾","authors":"Luca Giamattei, Antonio Guerriero, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is a fundamental part of software engineering to ensure stakeholders that software products work as expected after release in operation. Machine Learning (ML) has proven to be able to boost SQA activities and contribute to the development of quality software systems. In this context, <em>Causal Reasoning</em> is gaining increasing interest as a methodology to go beyond a purely data-driven approach by exploiting the use of causality for more effective SQA strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Provide a broad and detailed overview of the use of causal reasoning for SQA activities, in order to support researchers to access this research field, identifying room for application, main challenges and research opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A systematic review of the scientific literature on causal reasoning for SQA. The study has found, classified, and analyzed 86 articles, according to established guidelines for software engineering secondary studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Results highlight the primary areas within SQA where causal reasoning has been applied, the predominant methodologies used, and the level of maturity of the proposed solutions. Fault localization is the activity where causal reasoning is more exploited, especially in the web services/microservices domain, but other tasks like testing are rapidly gaining popularity. Both causal inference and causal discovery are exploited, with the Pearl’s graphical formulation of causality being preferred, likely due to its intuitiveness. Tools to favor their application are appearing at a fast pace — most of them after 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The findings show that causal reasoning is a valuable means for SQA tasks with respect to multiple quality attributes, especially during V&V, evolution and maintenance to ensure reliability, while it is not yet fully exploited for phases like requirements engineering and design. We give a picture of the current landscape, pointing out exciting possibilities for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 107599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal reasoning in Software Quality Assurance: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Luca Giamattei, Antonio Guerriero, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano Russo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is a fundamental part of software engineering to ensure stakeholders that software products work as expected after release in operation. Machine Learning (ML) has proven to be able to boost SQA activities and contribute to the development of quality software systems. In this context, <em>Causal Reasoning</em> is gaining increasing interest as a methodology to go beyond a purely data-driven approach by exploiting the use of causality for more effective SQA strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Provide a broad and detailed overview of the use of causal reasoning for SQA activities, in order to support researchers to access this research field, identifying room for application, main challenges and research opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A systematic review of the scientific literature on causal reasoning for SQA. The study has found, classified, and analyzed 86 articles, according to established guidelines for software engineering secondary studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Results highlight the primary areas within SQA where causal reasoning has been applied, the predominant methodologies used, and the level of maturity of the proposed solutions. Fault localization is the activity where causal reasoning is more exploited, especially in the web services/microservices domain, but other tasks like testing are rapidly gaining popularity. Both causal inference and causal discovery are exploited, with the Pearl’s graphical formulation of causality being preferred, likely due to its intuitiveness. Tools to favor their application are appearing at a fast pace — most of them after 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The findings show that causal reasoning is a valuable means for SQA tasks with respect to multiple quality attributes, especially during V&V, evolution and maintenance to ensure reliability, while it is not yet fully exploited for phases like requirements engineering and design. We give a picture of the current landscape, pointing out exciting possibilities for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Causal reasoning in Software Quality Assurance: A systematic review
Context:
Software Quality Assurance (SQA) is a fundamental part of software engineering to ensure stakeholders that software products work as expected after release in operation. Machine Learning (ML) has proven to be able to boost SQA activities and contribute to the development of quality software systems. In this context, Causal Reasoning is gaining increasing interest as a methodology to go beyond a purely data-driven approach by exploiting the use of causality for more effective SQA strategies.
Objective:
Provide a broad and detailed overview of the use of causal reasoning for SQA activities, in order to support researchers to access this research field, identifying room for application, main challenges and research opportunities.
Methods:
A systematic review of the scientific literature on causal reasoning for SQA. The study has found, classified, and analyzed 86 articles, according to established guidelines for software engineering secondary studies.
Results:
Results highlight the primary areas within SQA where causal reasoning has been applied, the predominant methodologies used, and the level of maturity of the proposed solutions. Fault localization is the activity where causal reasoning is more exploited, especially in the web services/microservices domain, but other tasks like testing are rapidly gaining popularity. Both causal inference and causal discovery are exploited, with the Pearl’s graphical formulation of causality being preferred, likely due to its intuitiveness. Tools to favor their application are appearing at a fast pace — most of them after 2021.
Conclusions:
The findings show that causal reasoning is a valuable means for SQA tasks with respect to multiple quality attributes, especially during V&V, evolution and maintenance to ensure reliability, while it is not yet fully exploited for phases like requirements engineering and design. We give a picture of the current landscape, pointing out exciting possibilities for future research.
期刊介绍:
Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include:
• Software management, quality and metrics,
• Software processes,
• Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming
• Functional and non-functional software requirements
• Software testing and verification & validation
• Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development
Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information.
The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.