大学生和教师对 HyFlex 学习的体验:范围审查

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100229
Therese M. Cumming , Chen Han , Lisa Gilanyi
{"title":"大学生和教师对 HyFlex 学习的体验:范围审查","authors":"Therese M. Cumming ,&nbsp;Chen Han ,&nbsp;Lisa Gilanyi","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global pandemic precipitated the movement of higher education course delivery from face-to-face to teaching online. During the post-pandemic period, some universities adopted the HyFlex model, which involves teaching students on-campus and online simultaneously. Widespread use of this model is in its infancy, therefore little is known about the experiences of university students and instructors using HyFlex mode. This knowledge is essential to the consideration of whether to continue, modify, or cease this form of course delivery. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the experiences of university instructors and students with the HyFlex model via a scoping review that followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from each study reviewed. Four key themes emerged from the analysis: (a) learning satisfaction, (b) benefits of the HyFlex mode, (c) barriers and challenges related to the HyFlex mode, and (d) external factors that influence the quality of teaching and learning in the HyFlex mode. Each of these is discussed in detail and implications for future practice and further research directions are considered. The review also uncovered that there is a dearth of studies that included the voice of instructors, hence highlighting an underresearched area regarding the HyFlex mode of instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Therese M. Cumming ,&nbsp;Chen Han ,&nbsp;Lisa Gilanyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global pandemic precipitated the movement of higher education course delivery from face-to-face to teaching online. During the post-pandemic period, some universities adopted the HyFlex model, which involves teaching students on-campus and online simultaneously. Widespread use of this model is in its infancy, therefore little is known about the experiences of university students and instructors using HyFlex mode. This knowledge is essential to the consideration of whether to continue, modify, or cease this form of course delivery. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the experiences of university instructors and students with the HyFlex model via a scoping review that followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from each study reviewed. Four key themes emerged from the analysis: (a) learning satisfaction, (b) benefits of the HyFlex mode, (c) barriers and challenges related to the HyFlex mode, and (d) external factors that influence the quality of teaching and learning in the HyFlex mode. Each of these is discussed in detail and implications for future practice and further research directions are considered. The review also uncovered that there is a dearth of studies that included the voice of instructors, hence highlighting an underresearched area regarding the HyFlex mode of instruction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球大流行促使高等教育课程从面授转向在线教学。在大流行后的时期,一些大学采用了 HyFlex 模式,即同时在校内和网上为学生授课。这种模式的广泛使用尚处于起步阶段,因此对大学生和教师使用 HyFlex 模式的经验知之甚少。这些知识对于考虑是否继续、修改或停止这种授课形式至关重要。因此,本次范围界定研究的目的是按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围界定研究框架,通过范围界定研究探索大学教师和学生使用 HyFlex 模式的经验,从而填补文献中的这一空白。我们采用了主题分析方法来分析每项研究的数据。分析得出了四个关键主题:(a) 学习满意度,(b) HyFlex 模式的益处,(c) 与 HyFlex 模式相关的障碍和挑战,以及 (d) 影响 HyFlex 模式教学质量的外部因素。我们对每一个因素都进行了详细讨论,并考虑了对未来实践和进一步研究方向的影响。综述还发现,包含教师意见的研究很少,因此凸显了 HyFlex 教学模式研究不足的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
The global pandemic precipitated the movement of higher education course delivery from face-to-face to teaching online. During the post-pandemic period, some universities adopted the HyFlex model, which involves teaching students on-campus and online simultaneously. Widespread use of this model is in its infancy, therefore little is known about the experiences of university students and instructors using HyFlex mode. This knowledge is essential to the consideration of whether to continue, modify, or cease this form of course delivery. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the experiences of university instructors and students with the HyFlex model via a scoping review that followed Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. A thematic analysis approach was used to analyse the data from each study reviewed. Four key themes emerged from the analysis: (a) learning satisfaction, (b) benefits of the HyFlex mode, (c) barriers and challenges related to the HyFlex mode, and (d) external factors that influence the quality of teaching and learning in the HyFlex mode. Each of these is discussed in detail and implications for future practice and further research directions are considered. The review also uncovered that there is a dearth of studies that included the voice of instructors, hence highlighting an underresearched area regarding the HyFlex mode of instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1