相同但不同:了解类似技术成果的差异性和相似性。比利时三家中小企业部署制造执行系统的比较案例研究

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Organization Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100539
Yennef Vereycken, Anne Guisset, Monique Ramioul
{"title":"相同但不同:了解类似技术成果的差异性和相似性。比利时三家中小企业部署制造执行系统的比较案例研究","authors":"Yennef Vereycken,&nbsp;Anne Guisset,&nbsp;Monique Ramioul","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current research on technological innovation seems preoccupied with studying the varying outcomes of technological innovation on work and organisations. <em>To understand this variation and explain why technological innovation leads to specific outcomes</em>, the <em>process</em> of technological innovation must be scrutinized. A comparative case study was conducted to examine the design, implementation and use of an identical technology (Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)) in three Belgian SMEs. We <em>explain</em> the organisational and labour related outcomes of MES deployment by analysing both the <em>strategic choices</em> during the selection, design, implementation and utilization of MES in relation to the <em>division of labour</em> between employees, management and technology developers during the technological innovation process. Our findings show how various strategic choices and different divisions of labour lead to both overarching similarities (e.g. increased centralisation, standardization and employee control) as well as important variations in technological outcomes (e.g. degree of (de)centralisation, standardization and employee control). These results illustrate the relative autonomy organisations have in shaping technological outcomes while simultaneously showing the limitations they face, stemming from (I) the material characteristics of technology shaped at <em>meso</em> and macro political level and (II) the social relations at organisational level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 100539"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The same but different: Understanding variation and similarity in the outcomes of a similar technology. A comparative case study on the deployment of manufacturing execution systems in three Belgian SME's\",\"authors\":\"Yennef Vereycken,&nbsp;Anne Guisset,&nbsp;Monique Ramioul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Current research on technological innovation seems preoccupied with studying the varying outcomes of technological innovation on work and organisations. <em>To understand this variation and explain why technological innovation leads to specific outcomes</em>, the <em>process</em> of technological innovation must be scrutinized. A comparative case study was conducted to examine the design, implementation and use of an identical technology (Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)) in three Belgian SMEs. We <em>explain</em> the organisational and labour related outcomes of MES deployment by analysing both the <em>strategic choices</em> during the selection, design, implementation and utilization of MES in relation to the <em>division of labour</em> between employees, management and technology developers during the technological innovation process. Our findings show how various strategic choices and different divisions of labour lead to both overarching similarities (e.g. increased centralisation, standardization and employee control) as well as important variations in technological outcomes (e.g. degree of (de)centralisation, standardization and employee control). These results illustrate the relative autonomy organisations have in shaping technological outcomes while simultaneously showing the limitations they face, stemming from (I) the material characteristics of technology shaped at <em>meso</em> and macro political level and (II) the social relations at organisational level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Organization\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于技术创新的研究似乎专注于研究技术创新对工作和组织产生的不同结果。要理解这种差异并解释为什么技术创新会导致特定的结果,就必须仔细研究技术创新的过程。我们开展了一项比较案例研究,考察了比利时三家中小企业设计、实施和使用相同技术(制造执行系统(MES))的情况。我们通过分析制造执行系统的选择、设计、实施和使用过程中的战略选择,以及技术创新过程中员工、管理层和技术开发人员之间的分工,解释了制造执行系统部署的组织和劳动力相关结果。我们的研究结果表明,各种战略选择和不同的分工如何导致总体上的相似性(如加强集中化、标准化和员工控制)以及技术成果上的重要差异(如(去)集中化、标准化和员工控制的程度)。这些结果说明了组织在塑造技术成果方面的相对自主性,同时也表明了它们所面临的局限性,这些局限性来自于(I)在中观和宏观政治层面上塑造的技术的物质特征,以及(II)组织层面上的社会关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The same but different: Understanding variation and similarity in the outcomes of a similar technology. A comparative case study on the deployment of manufacturing execution systems in three Belgian SME's
Current research on technological innovation seems preoccupied with studying the varying outcomes of technological innovation on work and organisations. To understand this variation and explain why technological innovation leads to specific outcomes, the process of technological innovation must be scrutinized. A comparative case study was conducted to examine the design, implementation and use of an identical technology (Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)) in three Belgian SMEs. We explain the organisational and labour related outcomes of MES deployment by analysing both the strategic choices during the selection, design, implementation and utilization of MES in relation to the division of labour between employees, management and technology developers during the technological innovation process. Our findings show how various strategic choices and different divisions of labour lead to both overarching similarities (e.g. increased centralisation, standardization and employee control) as well as important variations in technological outcomes (e.g. degree of (de)centralisation, standardization and employee control). These results illustrate the relative autonomy organisations have in shaping technological outcomes while simultaneously showing the limitations they face, stemming from (I) the material characteristics of technology shaped at meso and macro political level and (II) the social relations at organisational level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
期刊最新文献
A divergent model of online social movements in organizations When is enough enough? A critical assessment of data adequacy in IS qualitative research The same but different: Understanding variation and similarity in the outcomes of a similar technology. A comparative case study on the deployment of manufacturing execution systems in three Belgian SME's Beyond connectivity: Artificial intelligence and the internationalisation of digital firms Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1