{"title":"交叉腿皮瓣,治疗踝关节和足部创伤后软组织缺损的替代手术","authors":"Fadlurrahman Manaf , Azmi Farhadi","doi":"10.1016/j.sycrs.2024.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Soft tissue defects that afflict the ankle and foot are mostly the result of trauma. Large wounds with soft tissue defects, especially in the ankle and foot, are a reconstructive challenge due to the lack of availability of local tissues and recipient vessels.</div></div><div><h3>Case Presentation</h3><div>We report a female with a crush injury of the right foot and a Lisfranc injury due to a motor vehicle accident. The patient had a soft tissue defect 20 × 10 cm2 with bone and tendon exposed. The patient had a fasciocutaneous flap from the posteromedial of the distal contralateral leg for soft tissue reconstruction. Both legs were stabilized with a cast. The cross-leg flap was separated from the donor site three weeks later, and K-Wire was removed. Flap evaluation was good, and the patient resumed normal gait and activity without any stiffness of joints related to the flap or cast.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the ankle and foot is a challenge for surgeons due to the paucity of local and regional tissues and associated vessel injuries. Cross-leg flap can be suitable alternative option. In this case, we use medially based fasciocutaneous perforator cross-leg flap, based on the posterior tibial artery perforators. Cross-leg flaps are less technically demanding, and the probability of reexploration is lower than in free flaps. The cross-leg flap has the disadvantage of prolonged immobilization and uncomfortable resting positions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cross-leg flap can be alternative solution for covering large soft tissue defects in ankle and foot with its advantages and disadvantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101189,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Case Reports","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-leg flap, alternative surgery for post traumatic soft tissue defect of ankle and foot\",\"authors\":\"Fadlurrahman Manaf , Azmi Farhadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sycrs.2024.100074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Soft tissue defects that afflict the ankle and foot are mostly the result of trauma. Large wounds with soft tissue defects, especially in the ankle and foot, are a reconstructive challenge due to the lack of availability of local tissues and recipient vessels.</div></div><div><h3>Case Presentation</h3><div>We report a female with a crush injury of the right foot and a Lisfranc injury due to a motor vehicle accident. The patient had a soft tissue defect 20 × 10 cm2 with bone and tendon exposed. The patient had a fasciocutaneous flap from the posteromedial of the distal contralateral leg for soft tissue reconstruction. Both legs were stabilized with a cast. The cross-leg flap was separated from the donor site three weeks later, and K-Wire was removed. Flap evaluation was good, and the patient resumed normal gait and activity without any stiffness of joints related to the flap or cast.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the ankle and foot is a challenge for surgeons due to the paucity of local and regional tissues and associated vessel injuries. Cross-leg flap can be suitable alternative option. In this case, we use medially based fasciocutaneous perforator cross-leg flap, based on the posterior tibial artery perforators. Cross-leg flaps are less technically demanding, and the probability of reexploration is lower than in free flaps. The cross-leg flap has the disadvantage of prolonged immobilization and uncomfortable resting positions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cross-leg flap can be alternative solution for covering large soft tissue defects in ankle and foot with its advantages and disadvantages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950103224000744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950103224000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景踝关节和足部软组织缺损大多是外伤所致。由于缺乏局部组织和受体血管,大面积软组织缺损的伤口,尤其是踝关节和足部的软组织缺损,是重建的一大挑战。患者的软组织缺损面积为 20 × 10 平方厘米,骨头和肌腱外露。患者从对侧腿部远端后内侧取出筋膜皮瓣进行软组织重建。双腿用石膏固定。三周后,将跨腿皮瓣与供体部位分离,并移除 K 线。皮瓣评估结果良好,患者恢复了正常的步态和活动,没有出现任何与皮瓣或石膏有关的关节僵硬。 讨论由于缺乏局部和区域组织以及相关的血管损伤,踝关节和足部软组织缺损的重建对外科医生来说是一项挑战。跨腿皮瓣是一种合适的替代选择。在本病例中,我们使用了以胫后动脉穿孔器为基础的内侧筋膜皮穿孔器交叉腿皮瓣。与游离皮瓣相比,交叉腿皮瓣的技术要求较低,再次探查的概率也较低。结论:交叉腿皮瓣可作为覆盖踝关节和足部大面积软组织缺损的替代方案,但也有其优缺点。
Cross-leg flap, alternative surgery for post traumatic soft tissue defect of ankle and foot
Background
Soft tissue defects that afflict the ankle and foot are mostly the result of trauma. Large wounds with soft tissue defects, especially in the ankle and foot, are a reconstructive challenge due to the lack of availability of local tissues and recipient vessels.
Case Presentation
We report a female with a crush injury of the right foot and a Lisfranc injury due to a motor vehicle accident. The patient had a soft tissue defect 20 × 10 cm2 with bone and tendon exposed. The patient had a fasciocutaneous flap from the posteromedial of the distal contralateral leg for soft tissue reconstruction. Both legs were stabilized with a cast. The cross-leg flap was separated from the donor site three weeks later, and K-Wire was removed. Flap evaluation was good, and the patient resumed normal gait and activity without any stiffness of joints related to the flap or cast.
Discussion
Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the ankle and foot is a challenge for surgeons due to the paucity of local and regional tissues and associated vessel injuries. Cross-leg flap can be suitable alternative option. In this case, we use medially based fasciocutaneous perforator cross-leg flap, based on the posterior tibial artery perforators. Cross-leg flaps are less technically demanding, and the probability of reexploration is lower than in free flaps. The cross-leg flap has the disadvantage of prolonged immobilization and uncomfortable resting positions.
Conclusion
Cross-leg flap can be alternative solution for covering large soft tissue defects in ankle and foot with its advantages and disadvantages.