在受监控的诊所环境中,三步阿司匹林挑战方案的有效性和安全性

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.038
A. Irace, I. Thapar, J. Bosso, J. Douglas
{"title":"在受监控的诊所环境中,三步阿司匹林挑战方案的有效性和安全性","authors":"A. Irace,&nbsp;I. Thapar,&nbsp;J. Bosso,&nbsp;J. Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aspirin challenge is the gold standard procedure to diagnose aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and an unclear history of aspirin/NSAID drug reactions. The goal of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a 3-step in-clinic aspirin challenge protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2016-2023, 145 patients with CRSwNP and asthma underwent aspirin challenge. Increasing aspirin dosages, from 30 to 325 mg, were administered with a 60-minute (after 30 mg), 90-minute (after 81 mg), and 3-hour (after 325 mg) dosing interval in clinic. Patient demographics, vitals, symptoms and symptom scores, FEV1, peak nasal inspiratory flow rate (PNIFR), and treatments administered were analyzed. A positive reaction was defined as an increased symptom score ≥5 points from baseline, decreased FEV1 by ≥15%, or decreased PNIFR by ≥20%.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 145 patients, 67 (46.2%) had positive challenges. The most common provoking dose was 30 mg (47.8%), followed by 81 mg (43.3%). Among reactors, symptoms usually presented at the 1-hour (n=26, 38.8%) or 2-hour timepoint (n=18, 26.9%). From baseline to nadir, mean decrease in FEV1 was 8.9%, and mean decrease in PNIFR was 24.5%. The most common symptoms were nasal congestion (n=51, 76.1%) and rhinorrhea (n=23, 34.3%). Epinephrine was infrequently required (n=9, 13.4%). No patients required ED transfer or hospitalization, and mean challenge duration was 4.76 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With a mean duration &lt;5 hours and excellent safety profile, our study demonstrates an efficient, 3-step aspirin challenge protocol that was safely performed in an outpatient clinic setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":"133 6","pages":"Page S3"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A THREE-STEP ASPIRIN CHALLENGE PROTOCOL IN A MONITORED CLINIC SETTING\",\"authors\":\"A. Irace,&nbsp;I. Thapar,&nbsp;J. Bosso,&nbsp;J. Douglas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aspirin challenge is the gold standard procedure to diagnose aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and an unclear history of aspirin/NSAID drug reactions. The goal of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a 3-step in-clinic aspirin challenge protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2016-2023, 145 patients with CRSwNP and asthma underwent aspirin challenge. Increasing aspirin dosages, from 30 to 325 mg, were administered with a 60-minute (after 30 mg), 90-minute (after 81 mg), and 3-hour (after 325 mg) dosing interval in clinic. Patient demographics, vitals, symptoms and symptom scores, FEV1, peak nasal inspiratory flow rate (PNIFR), and treatments administered were analyzed. A positive reaction was defined as an increased symptom score ≥5 points from baseline, decreased FEV1 by ≥15%, or decreased PNIFR by ≥20%.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 145 patients, 67 (46.2%) had positive challenges. The most common provoking dose was 30 mg (47.8%), followed by 81 mg (43.3%). Among reactors, symptoms usually presented at the 1-hour (n=26, 38.8%) or 2-hour timepoint (n=18, 26.9%). From baseline to nadir, mean decrease in FEV1 was 8.9%, and mean decrease in PNIFR was 24.5%. The most common symptoms were nasal congestion (n=51, 76.1%) and rhinorrhea (n=23, 34.3%). Epinephrine was infrequently required (n=9, 13.4%). No patients required ED transfer or hospitalization, and mean challenge duration was 4.76 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With a mean duration &lt;5 hours and excellent safety profile, our study demonstrates an efficient, 3-step aspirin challenge protocol that was safely performed in an outpatient clinic setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"133 6\",\"pages\":\"Page S3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624005830\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624005830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言阿司匹林挑战是诊断慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)、哮喘和阿司匹林/非甾体抗炎药物反应史不明确的患者阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病的金标准程序。本研究的目的是确定诊所内阿司匹林挑战三步方案的有效性和安全性。方法从 2016 年至 2023 年,145 名 CRSwNP 和哮喘患者接受了阿司匹林挑战。阿司匹林剂量从 30 毫克到 325 毫克不断增加,临床给药间隔分别为 60 分钟(30 毫克后)、90 分钟(81 毫克后)和 3 小时(325 毫克后)。对患者的人口统计学特征、生命体征、症状和症状评分、FEV1、鼻吸气流量峰值 (PNIFR) 和治疗方法进行了分析。阳性反应的定义是症状评分比基线增加≥5分,FEV1下降≥15%,或PNIFR下降≥20%。最常见的激起剂量是 30 毫克(47.8%),其次是 81 毫克(43.3%)。在反应者中,症状通常在 1 小时(26 人,占 38.8%)或 2 小时(18 人,占 26.9%)时出现。从基线到最低点,FEV1 平均下降 8.9%,PNIFR 平均下降 24.5%。最常见的症状是鼻塞(51 人,占 76.1%)和鼻出血(23 人,占 34.3%)。需要肾上腺素的情况不多(9 人,占 13.4%)。没有患者需要转送急诊室或住院治疗,平均挑战持续时间为 4.76 小时。结论我们的研究展示了一种高效的三步阿司匹林挑战方案,其平均持续时间为 5 小时,安全性极佳,可在门诊环境中安全实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A THREE-STEP ASPIRIN CHALLENGE PROTOCOL IN A MONITORED CLINIC SETTING

Introduction

Aspirin challenge is the gold standard procedure to diagnose aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and an unclear history of aspirin/NSAID drug reactions. The goal of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a 3-step in-clinic aspirin challenge protocol.

Methods

From 2016-2023, 145 patients with CRSwNP and asthma underwent aspirin challenge. Increasing aspirin dosages, from 30 to 325 mg, were administered with a 60-minute (after 30 mg), 90-minute (after 81 mg), and 3-hour (after 325 mg) dosing interval in clinic. Patient demographics, vitals, symptoms and symptom scores, FEV1, peak nasal inspiratory flow rate (PNIFR), and treatments administered were analyzed. A positive reaction was defined as an increased symptom score ≥5 points from baseline, decreased FEV1 by ≥15%, or decreased PNIFR by ≥20%.

Results

Among 145 patients, 67 (46.2%) had positive challenges. The most common provoking dose was 30 mg (47.8%), followed by 81 mg (43.3%). Among reactors, symptoms usually presented at the 1-hour (n=26, 38.8%) or 2-hour timepoint (n=18, 26.9%). From baseline to nadir, mean decrease in FEV1 was 8.9%, and mean decrease in PNIFR was 24.5%. The most common symptoms were nasal congestion (n=51, 76.1%) and rhinorrhea (n=23, 34.3%). Epinephrine was infrequently required (n=9, 13.4%). No patients required ED transfer or hospitalization, and mean challenge duration was 4.76 hours.

Conclusion

With a mean duration <5 hours and excellent safety profile, our study demonstrates an efficient, 3-step aspirin challenge protocol that was safely performed in an outpatient clinic setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
期刊最新文献
From the Pages of AllergyWatch. How best to choose an oscillometer and reference equations for your patients with asthma. Oscillometry-defined small airways dysfunction as a treatable trait in asthma. Analyzing Phenotypes Post-Exposure in Allergic Rhinitis (APPEAR) in the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU). Perturbations in the airway microbiome are associated with type 2 asthma phenotype and severity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1