塞马鲁肽是滞留固体胃内容物的独立预测因子,但当日结肠镜检查可减轻影响

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2024.07.001
Haarika Korlipara , Jason Chua , Adam Buckholz , Jacob Jamison , Ariel Gonzalez , Sonal Kumar , Marissa Weber , Sanjay Salgado , Reem Sharaiha , Carolyn Newberry
{"title":"塞马鲁肽是滞留固体胃内容物的独立预测因子,但当日结肠镜检查可减轻影响","authors":"Haarika Korlipara ,&nbsp;Jason Chua ,&nbsp;Adam Buckholz ,&nbsp;Jacob Jamison ,&nbsp;Ariel Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Sonal Kumar ,&nbsp;Marissa Weber ,&nbsp;Sanjay Salgado ,&nbsp;Reem Sharaiha ,&nbsp;Carolyn Newberry","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are commonly prescribed for diabetes and obesity; however, their use may complicate anesthetized procedures due to delayed gastric emptying. This study sought to define rates of retained solid gastric contents, a risk factor for periprocedural complications, in a population taking semaglutide.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This is a retrospective cohort study comparing individuals undergoing upper endoscopy over a 5-year period at a tertiary care center who were prescribed semaglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, for &gt;4 weeks against a matched control cohort not on the medication. Multivariant logistic regression and multivariable propensity-matched association analysis were conducted to compare outcomes of interest, including retained solid gastric contents, endoscopic complications, and endoscopic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>In total, 1212 patients comprised the study population (602 on semaglutide, 610 not on semaglutide). On multivariant logistic regression analyzing causes of delayed gastric emptying, semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents (odds ratio [OR], 4.74; 95% CI, 2.40-9.35; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). On multivariable propensity-matched association analysis utilizing demographic and clinical characteristics, semaglutide use was associated with an absolute increase of 6% of retained solid gastric contents (coefficient, 0.0644; 95% CI, 0.034-0.095; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Same-day colonoscopy was protective against this finding (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.73; <em>P</em> = 0.003). Intubation was rare and not associated with semaglutide use (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.64; <em>P</em> = 0.41). No periprocedural aspiration events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents, even when accounting for confounding factors. This was negated in patients undergoing same-day colonoscopy, indicating an opportunity for preprocedural fasting protocols in the absence of medication hold.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semaglutide Is an Independent Predictor of Retained Solid Gastric Contents, but Same-Day Colonoscopy Mitigates Effect\",\"authors\":\"Haarika Korlipara ,&nbsp;Jason Chua ,&nbsp;Adam Buckholz ,&nbsp;Jacob Jamison ,&nbsp;Ariel Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Sonal Kumar ,&nbsp;Marissa Weber ,&nbsp;Sanjay Salgado ,&nbsp;Reem Sharaiha ,&nbsp;Carolyn Newberry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are commonly prescribed for diabetes and obesity; however, their use may complicate anesthetized procedures due to delayed gastric emptying. This study sought to define rates of retained solid gastric contents, a risk factor for periprocedural complications, in a population taking semaglutide.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This is a retrospective cohort study comparing individuals undergoing upper endoscopy over a 5-year period at a tertiary care center who were prescribed semaglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, for &gt;4 weeks against a matched control cohort not on the medication. Multivariant logistic regression and multivariable propensity-matched association analysis were conducted to compare outcomes of interest, including retained solid gastric contents, endoscopic complications, and endoscopic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>In total, 1212 patients comprised the study population (602 on semaglutide, 610 not on semaglutide). On multivariant logistic regression analyzing causes of delayed gastric emptying, semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents (odds ratio [OR], 4.74; 95% CI, 2.40-9.35; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). On multivariable propensity-matched association analysis utilizing demographic and clinical characteristics, semaglutide use was associated with an absolute increase of 6% of retained solid gastric contents (coefficient, 0.0644; 95% CI, 0.034-0.095; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Same-day colonoscopy was protective against this finding (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.73; <em>P</em> = 0.003). Intubation was rare and not associated with semaglutide use (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.64; <em>P</em> = 0.41). No periprocedural aspiration events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents, even when accounting for confounding factors. This was negated in patients undergoing same-day colonoscopy, indicating an opportunity for preprocedural fasting protocols in the absence of medication hold.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂是治疗糖尿病和肥胖症的常用处方药;然而,由于胃排空延迟,使用这种药物可能会使麻醉手术复杂化。这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了在一家三级医疗中心接受上内镜检查的患者与未使用该药物的匹配对照组的情况,前者在5年时间里服用了长效胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂--塞马鲁肽4周,后者在4周时间里服用了塞马鲁肽4周。研究人员进行了多变量逻辑回归和多变量倾向匹配关联分析,以比较相关结果,包括滞留的固态胃内容物、内镜并发症和内镜结果。多变量逻辑回归分析了胃排空延迟的原因,结果显示,塞马鲁肽是固体胃内容物滞留的独立风险因素(几率比 [OR],4.74;95% CI,2.40-9.35;P <;0.0001)。在利用人口统计学和临床特征进行的多变量倾向匹配关联分析中,使用塞马鲁肽与固性胃内容物滞留率绝对值增加6%有关(系数为0.0644;95% CI为0.034-0.095;P <;0.0001)。当天的结肠镜检查对这一结果具有保护作用(OR,0.41;95% CI,0.23-0.73;P = 0.003)。插管很少见,且与使用塞马鲁肽无关(OR,0.70;95% CI,0.30-1.64;P = 0.41)。结论 即使考虑到混杂因素,塞马鲁肽也是固体胃内容物滞留的独立风险因素。接受当天结肠镜检查的患者不会出现这种情况,这表明在没有药物保留的情况下,可以在术前禁食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Semaglutide Is an Independent Predictor of Retained Solid Gastric Contents, but Same-Day Colonoscopy Mitigates Effect

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are commonly prescribed for diabetes and obesity; however, their use may complicate anesthetized procedures due to delayed gastric emptying. This study sought to define rates of retained solid gastric contents, a risk factor for periprocedural complications, in a population taking semaglutide.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing individuals undergoing upper endoscopy over a 5-year period at a tertiary care center who were prescribed semaglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, for >4 weeks against a matched control cohort not on the medication. Multivariant logistic regression and multivariable propensity-matched association analysis were conducted to compare outcomes of interest, including retained solid gastric contents, endoscopic complications, and endoscopic outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 1212 patients comprised the study population (602 on semaglutide, 610 not on semaglutide). On multivariant logistic regression analyzing causes of delayed gastric emptying, semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents (odds ratio [OR], 4.74; 95% CI, 2.40-9.35; P < 0.0001). On multivariable propensity-matched association analysis utilizing demographic and clinical characteristics, semaglutide use was associated with an absolute increase of 6% of retained solid gastric contents (coefficient, 0.0644; 95% CI, 0.034-0.095; P < 0.0001). Same-day colonoscopy was protective against this finding (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.73; P = 0.003). Intubation was rare and not associated with semaglutide use (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.64; P = 0.41). No periprocedural aspiration events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide was an independent risk factor for retained solid gastric contents, even when accounting for confounding factors. This was negated in patients undergoing same-day colonoscopy, indicating an opportunity for preprocedural fasting protocols in the absence of medication hold.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing Endoscopic Suture vs Clip vs No Intervention in Esophageal Stent Migration: A Network Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1