对科技、数学和工程学领域女教师在校园中性别的学术氛围进行评估

Kaoru Tamada , Eriko Jotaki , Naoko Tsukamoto , Shoko Sagara , Junko N. Kondo , Masao Mori , Miwako Waga , Sandra Brown
{"title":"对科技、数学和工程学领域女教师在校园中性别的学术氛围进行评估","authors":"Kaoru Tamada ,&nbsp;Eriko Jotaki ,&nbsp;Naoko Tsukamoto ,&nbsp;Shoko Sagara ,&nbsp;Junko N. Kondo ,&nbsp;Masao Mori ,&nbsp;Miwako Waga ,&nbsp;Sandra Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The status of gender equity at universities is often evaluated via statistical data such as the proportions of women faculty members and students. However, given that women are still a minority in decision-making positions while gender parity has been achieved in most countries for students, simply increasing the proportion of women alone is not enough to ensure a truly gender-neutral (gender bias-free) academic climate on campuses, i.e., continuous efforts are required to create an environment that promotes the active participation of women. In particular, when the environment for cutting-edge advanced research in STEM fields is considered, despite the necessity for a gender perspective in science and technology innovation, the establishment of a gender-neutral academic climate has yet to be achieved. To solve this problem, a new indicator that accurately and quantitatively reflects the status of the gender-neutral academic climate on campuses is urgently needed.</div><div>On the basis of this idea, this paper proposes a new method for quantitatively assessing the gender-neutral academic climate at each school/division/department of a university by analyzing scholarly output by gender. We created a bubble chart called the Academic Gender Equity Index (Academic_GEI), which consists of scholarly output and the proportion and absolute number of women faculty members, and used it as an indicator of human resource initiatives for gender equality within disciplines. We conducted a survey using this methodology in several countries (Japan/USA/EU). The Academic_GEI, along with other existing indicators, can be used to foster a gender-neutral academic climate for the next generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the gender-neutral academic climate on campus for women faculty in STEM fields\",\"authors\":\"Kaoru Tamada ,&nbsp;Eriko Jotaki ,&nbsp;Naoko Tsukamoto ,&nbsp;Shoko Sagara ,&nbsp;Junko N. Kondo ,&nbsp;Masao Mori ,&nbsp;Miwako Waga ,&nbsp;Sandra Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The status of gender equity at universities is often evaluated via statistical data such as the proportions of women faculty members and students. However, given that women are still a minority in decision-making positions while gender parity has been achieved in most countries for students, simply increasing the proportion of women alone is not enough to ensure a truly gender-neutral (gender bias-free) academic climate on campuses, i.e., continuous efforts are required to create an environment that promotes the active participation of women. In particular, when the environment for cutting-edge advanced research in STEM fields is considered, despite the necessity for a gender perspective in science and technology innovation, the establishment of a gender-neutral academic climate has yet to be achieved. To solve this problem, a new indicator that accurately and quantitatively reflects the status of the gender-neutral academic climate on campuses is urgently needed.</div><div>On the basis of this idea, this paper proposes a new method for quantitatively assessing the gender-neutral academic climate at each school/division/department of a university by analyzing scholarly output by gender. We created a bubble chart called the Academic Gender Equity Index (Academic_GEI), which consists of scholarly output and the proportion and absolute number of women faculty members, and used it as an indicator of human resource initiatives for gender equality within disciplines. We conducted a survey using this methodology in several countries (Japan/USA/EU). The Academic_GEI, along with other existing indicators, can be used to foster a gender-neutral academic climate for the next generation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学的性别平等状况通常通过统计数据来评估,如女教师和女学生的比例。然而,鉴于女性在决策岗位上仍占少数,而大多数国家的学生已实现性别均等,仅仅提高女性比例还不足以确保校园中真正的性别中立(无性别偏见)的学术氛围,即需要不断努力创造一个促进女性积极参与的环境。特别是在考虑 STEM 领域的前沿高级研究环境时,尽管在科技创新中必须有性别视角,但性别中立的学术氛围尚未建立。为了解决这一问题,迫切需要一种新的指标来准确、定量地反映校园性别中立学术氛围的状况。在此基础上,本文提出了一种新的方法,即通过分析按性别划分的学术产出来定量评估大学各学院/系/部的性别中立学术氛围。我们制作了一个名为 "学术性别平等指数"(Academic_GEI)的气泡图,由学术成果和女教师的比例和绝对人数组成,并将其作为学科内性别平等人力资源措施的指标。我们采用这种方法在多个国家(日本/美国/欧盟)进行了调查。学术性别平等指数以及其他现有指标可用于为下一代营造不分性别的学术氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the gender-neutral academic climate on campus for women faculty in STEM fields
The status of gender equity at universities is often evaluated via statistical data such as the proportions of women faculty members and students. However, given that women are still a minority in decision-making positions while gender parity has been achieved in most countries for students, simply increasing the proportion of women alone is not enough to ensure a truly gender-neutral (gender bias-free) academic climate on campuses, i.e., continuous efforts are required to create an environment that promotes the active participation of women. In particular, when the environment for cutting-edge advanced research in STEM fields is considered, despite the necessity for a gender perspective in science and technology innovation, the establishment of a gender-neutral academic climate has yet to be achieved. To solve this problem, a new indicator that accurately and quantitatively reflects the status of the gender-neutral academic climate on campuses is urgently needed.
On the basis of this idea, this paper proposes a new method for quantitatively assessing the gender-neutral academic climate at each school/division/department of a university by analyzing scholarly output by gender. We created a bubble chart called the Academic Gender Equity Index (Academic_GEI), which consists of scholarly output and the proportion and absolute number of women faculty members, and used it as an indicator of human resource initiatives for gender equality within disciplines. We conducted a survey using this methodology in several countries (Japan/USA/EU). The Academic_GEI, along with other existing indicators, can be used to foster a gender-neutral academic climate for the next generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Resilience in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping literature review with implications for evidence-informed policymaking Effectiveness of a locally developed cultural responsiveness tool for Australian teachers. Pre-service english teachers’ perceptions of language assessment in a colombian language teacher education program Promoting a restorative culture in schools: Insights from school leaders Emotional exhaustion faced by Italian female teaching staff during COVID-19 pandemic: A sequential mediation model applying coping strategies, self-efficacy for online teaching, and technostress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1