{"title":"探索高等教育中教师研究的性质和范围:系统性范围界定审查","authors":"Yating Lyu, Allen Thurston","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the considerable engagement of university teachers in educational research, there have been no systematic, evidence-based investigations into teacher research in higher education. Therefore, a systematic scoping review on peer-reviewed teacher research articles published in academic journals from 2010 to 2019 was conducted to explore the nature and scope of teacher research in higher education. The review searched studies from eight electronic databases, including British Education Index, Education Abstracts, Eric (subscription version), ProQuest Education Journals, Scopus, Taylor and Francis Online Journals, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. The initial search generated 627 studies published in 2010–2019. After initial screening and full-text screening, 275 articles met the final inclusion criteria of the review, based on which a quantitative descriptive analysis was produced. A key finding from the review is that a significant volume of teacher research has been published by university teachers from various disciplines. However, very little of it was underpinned by solid theoretical frameworks which was a deficiency in the available literature. There is a clear need for university teachers who develop careers as academics specialising in teaching and educational research to understand the criteria of sound theory and design that facilitate publication in top-tier journals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the nature and scope of teacher research in higher education: A systematic scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Yating Lyu, Allen Thurston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the considerable engagement of university teachers in educational research, there have been no systematic, evidence-based investigations into teacher research in higher education. Therefore, a systematic scoping review on peer-reviewed teacher research articles published in academic journals from 2010 to 2019 was conducted to explore the nature and scope of teacher research in higher education. The review searched studies from eight electronic databases, including British Education Index, Education Abstracts, Eric (subscription version), ProQuest Education Journals, Scopus, Taylor and Francis Online Journals, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. The initial search generated 627 studies published in 2010–2019. After initial screening and full-text screening, 275 articles met the final inclusion criteria of the review, based on which a quantitative descriptive analysis was produced. A key finding from the review is that a significant volume of teacher research has been published by university teachers from various disciplines. However, very little of it was underpinned by solid theoretical frameworks which was a deficiency in the available literature. There is a clear need for university teachers who develop careers as academics specialising in teaching and educational research to understand the criteria of sound theory and design that facilitate publication in top-tier journals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402400075X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402400075X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管大学教师在教育研究中的参与度很高,但对高等教育中的教师研究还没有系统的、以证据为基础的调查。因此,我们对 2010 年至 2019 年学术期刊上发表的经同行评审的教师研究文章进行了系统的范围界定审查,以探索高等教育中教师研究的性质和范围。综述从八个电子数据库中检索了相关研究,包括 British Education Index、Education Abstracts、Eric(订阅版)、ProQuest Education Journals、Scopus、Taylor and Francis Online Journals、Web of Science 和 ScienceDirect。初步搜索结果为 2010-2019 年间发表的 627 项研究。经过初步筛选和全文筛选,275 篇文章符合综述的最终纳入标准,并在此基础上进行了定量描述性分析。综述的一个重要发现是,各学科的大学教师发表了大量的教师研究文章。然而,其中很少有坚实的理论框架作为支撑,这是现有文献的不足之处。显然,作为专门从事教学和教育研究的学者,大学教师有必要了解有助于在顶级期刊上发表论文的合理理论和设计标准。
Exploring the nature and scope of teacher research in higher education: A systematic scoping review
Despite the considerable engagement of university teachers in educational research, there have been no systematic, evidence-based investigations into teacher research in higher education. Therefore, a systematic scoping review on peer-reviewed teacher research articles published in academic journals from 2010 to 2019 was conducted to explore the nature and scope of teacher research in higher education. The review searched studies from eight electronic databases, including British Education Index, Education Abstracts, Eric (subscription version), ProQuest Education Journals, Scopus, Taylor and Francis Online Journals, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. The initial search generated 627 studies published in 2010–2019. After initial screening and full-text screening, 275 articles met the final inclusion criteria of the review, based on which a quantitative descriptive analysis was produced. A key finding from the review is that a significant volume of teacher research has been published by university teachers from various disciplines. However, very little of it was underpinned by solid theoretical frameworks which was a deficiency in the available literature. There is a clear need for university teachers who develop careers as academics specialising in teaching and educational research to understand the criteria of sound theory and design that facilitate publication in top-tier journals.