企业可持续发展报告和企业 ESG 分数的文本分析

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669
Urša Ferjančič , Riste Ichev , Igor Lončarski , Syrielle Montariol , Andraž Pelicon , Senja Pollak , Katarina Sitar Šuštar , Aleš Toman , Aljoša Valentinčič , Martin Žnidaršič
{"title":"企业可持续发展报告和企业 ESG 分数的文本分析","authors":"Urša Ferjančič ,&nbsp;Riste Ichev ,&nbsp;Igor Lončarski ,&nbsp;Syrielle Montariol ,&nbsp;Andraž Pelicon ,&nbsp;Senja Pollak ,&nbsp;Katarina Sitar Šuštar ,&nbsp;Aleš Toman ,&nbsp;Aljoša Valentinčič ,&nbsp;Martin Žnidaršič","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the evolution of environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting by analysing a ten-year corpus of annual reports from FTSE 350 companies. Using BERTopic, an advanced topic modelling technique, we identify and subsequently cluster the most important ESG topics, providing significant insights into the reporting landscape. Our findings show how regulatory changes, such as the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, and major events like Covid-19, influence ESG topic prominence. The disclosure of ESG information is primarily determined by regulatory requirements. This is particularly evident in the fact that companies only disclose the diversity on the board, which is mandatory, but not the diversity and inclusion at other levels of the reporting organisation. Furthermore, our study examines the correlation between ESG scores and topic proportions, showing that extensive disclosure on topics like climate risk and stakeholder engagement is positively associated with higher ESG scores, whereas topics like executive remuneration show negative correlations. Our research contributes to the literature by offering a novel methodological approach to ESG analysis and provides insights into the gaps between reporting standards and practices, relevant to standard-setting bodies and regulators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103669"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textual analysis of corporate sustainability reporting and corporate ESG scores\",\"authors\":\"Urša Ferjančič ,&nbsp;Riste Ichev ,&nbsp;Igor Lončarski ,&nbsp;Syrielle Montariol ,&nbsp;Andraž Pelicon ,&nbsp;Senja Pollak ,&nbsp;Katarina Sitar Šuštar ,&nbsp;Aleš Toman ,&nbsp;Aljoša Valentinčič ,&nbsp;Martin Žnidaršič\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the evolution of environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting by analysing a ten-year corpus of annual reports from FTSE 350 companies. Using BERTopic, an advanced topic modelling technique, we identify and subsequently cluster the most important ESG topics, providing significant insights into the reporting landscape. Our findings show how regulatory changes, such as the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, and major events like Covid-19, influence ESG topic prominence. The disclosure of ESG information is primarily determined by regulatory requirements. This is particularly evident in the fact that companies only disclose the diversity on the board, which is mandatory, but not the diversity and inclusion at other levels of the reporting organisation. Furthermore, our study examines the correlation between ESG scores and topic proportions, showing that extensive disclosure on topics like climate risk and stakeholder engagement is positively associated with higher ESG scores, whereas topics like executive remuneration show negative correlations. Our research contributes to the literature by offering a novel methodological approach to ESG analysis and provides insights into the gaps between reporting standards and practices, relevant to standard-setting bodies and regulators.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192400601X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192400601X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过分析富时 350 指数(FTSE 350)公司的十年年报语料库,研究了环境、社会和治理(ESG)报告的演变。利用 BERTopic(一种先进的主题建模技术),我们确定了最重要的环境、社会和治理主题,并随后对其进行了聚类,从而提供了对报告情况的重要见解。我们的研究结果表明,《非财务报告指令》等监管变化和 Covid-19 等重大事件如何影响 ESG 主题的突出程度。ESG 信息的披露主要由监管要求决定。这一点在以下事实中尤为明显:公司只披露董事会的多样性(这是强制性的),而不披露报告组织其他层面的多样性和包容性。此外,我们的研究还考察了 ESG 分数与主题比例之间的相关性,结果表明,气候风险和利益相关者参与等主题的广泛披露与较高的 ESG 分数呈正相关,而高管薪酬等主题则呈负相关。我们的研究为环境、社会和公司治理分析提供了一种新颖的方法论,并为标准制定机构和监管机构深入了解报告标准与实践之间的差距做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Textual analysis of corporate sustainability reporting and corporate ESG scores
This paper examines the evolution of environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting by analysing a ten-year corpus of annual reports from FTSE 350 companies. Using BERTopic, an advanced topic modelling technique, we identify and subsequently cluster the most important ESG topics, providing significant insights into the reporting landscape. Our findings show how regulatory changes, such as the Non-Financial Reporting Directive, and major events like Covid-19, influence ESG topic prominence. The disclosure of ESG information is primarily determined by regulatory requirements. This is particularly evident in the fact that companies only disclose the diversity on the board, which is mandatory, but not the diversity and inclusion at other levels of the reporting organisation. Furthermore, our study examines the correlation between ESG scores and topic proportions, showing that extensive disclosure on topics like climate risk and stakeholder engagement is positively associated with higher ESG scores, whereas topics like executive remuneration show negative correlations. Our research contributes to the literature by offering a novel methodological approach to ESG analysis and provides insights into the gaps between reporting standards and practices, relevant to standard-setting bodies and regulators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural green production efficiency within a green finance framework: Empirical evidence from China EmTract: Extracting emotions from social media Pay for air pollution: Ecological compensation policy and corporate investment Socially responsible investment and fund performance: The moderating roles of mutual funds' operating environments Digital financial inclusion, e-commerce development and entrepreneurial activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1