一家医疗机构十五年的经验:早期霍奇金淋巴瘤化疗与综合疗法的疗效比较

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101636
Joshua Y. Qian MD , Radhesh Amin BS , Humzah Ali BS , Yichun Cao MPH , Jeffrey M. Switchenko PhD , Arif S. Rashid MD , Pamela B. Allen MD , Sheela Hanasoge MBBS, PhD , Mohammad K. Khan MD, PhD
{"title":"一家医疗机构十五年的经验:早期霍奇金淋巴瘤化疗与综合疗法的疗效比较","authors":"Joshua Y. Qian MD ,&nbsp;Radhesh Amin BS ,&nbsp;Humzah Ali BS ,&nbsp;Yichun Cao MPH ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Switchenko PhD ,&nbsp;Arif S. Rashid MD ,&nbsp;Pamela B. Allen MD ,&nbsp;Sheela Hanasoge MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Mohammad K. Khan MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). The use of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in addition to chemotherapy may lead to better survival rates but is controversial because of concerns about long-term toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy alone (CTX alone) versus ABVD with consolidative RT (CMT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A single-institution, retrospective review of patients with HL diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 years, with stage I or II HL, who received ABVD with a complete response with/without CMT. Consolidative RT must have been started within 90 days of completing chemotherapy. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Follow-up details and treatment responses were collected from medical record reviews. Standard statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and 8 patients with early-stage HL were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 19-72). Most patients were female (63%) and Caucasian (65%). stage II HL was present in 89%of patients, 89% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, 35% had B symptoms, and 9% had extranodal involvement. A total of 52.8% received CMT (<em>n</em> = 57) and 47.2% received CTX alone (<em>n</em> = 51). The CMT group had fewer cycles of chemotherapy compared to the CTX-alone group (mean cycles, 5.2 vs 5.7, <em>P</em> = 0.045). Twenty-four relapse events occurred in the CTX-alone group, while no relapse events occurred in the CMT group. RFS at 10 years was significantly improved in the CMT group (100%) compared to CTX alone (47.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001; HR = .03, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ABVD with consolidative RT was associated with improved RFS. Further studies of toxicity comparisons, advanced stages, and nonfavorable HL are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 12","pages":"Article 101636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifteen-Year Experience of a Single Institution: Outcomes for Early-Stage Hodgkins Lymphoma Comparing Chemotherapy Alone Versus Combined Modality Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Y. Qian MD ,&nbsp;Radhesh Amin BS ,&nbsp;Humzah Ali BS ,&nbsp;Yichun Cao MPH ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Switchenko PhD ,&nbsp;Arif S. Rashid MD ,&nbsp;Pamela B. Allen MD ,&nbsp;Sheela Hanasoge MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Mohammad K. Khan MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). The use of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in addition to chemotherapy may lead to better survival rates but is controversial because of concerns about long-term toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy alone (CTX alone) versus ABVD with consolidative RT (CMT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A single-institution, retrospective review of patients with HL diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 years, with stage I or II HL, who received ABVD with a complete response with/without CMT. Consolidative RT must have been started within 90 days of completing chemotherapy. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Follow-up details and treatment responses were collected from medical record reviews. Standard statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and 8 patients with early-stage HL were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 19-72). Most patients were female (63%) and Caucasian (65%). stage II HL was present in 89%of patients, 89% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, 35% had B symptoms, and 9% had extranodal involvement. A total of 52.8% received CMT (<em>n</em> = 57) and 47.2% received CTX alone (<em>n</em> = 51). The CMT group had fewer cycles of chemotherapy compared to the CTX-alone group (mean cycles, 5.2 vs 5.7, <em>P</em> = 0.045). Twenty-four relapse events occurred in the CTX-alone group, while no relapse events occurred in the CMT group. RFS at 10 years was significantly improved in the CMT group (100%) compared to CTX alone (47.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001; HR = .03, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ABVD with consolidative RT was associated with improved RFS. Further studies of toxicity comparisons, advanced stages, and nonfavorable HL are warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的多柔比星、博来霉素、长春新碱、达卡巴嗪(ABVD)化疗是目前治疗早期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的标准疗法。在化疗的基础上使用巩固性放疗(RT)可能会提高生存率,但由于对长期毒性的担忧而备受争议。本研究旨在比较单纯ABVD化疗(CTX)与ABVD加巩固性RT(CMT)患者的疗效。患者从国家癌症数据库中确认。纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁、Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期HL、接受ABVD治疗后获得完全缓解并伴有/不伴有CMT的患者。巩固性 RT 必须在完成化疗后 90 天内开始。已获得机构审查委员会批准。通过病历审查收集随访详情和治疗反应。采用标准统计分析和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线估算无复发生存期(RFS)。确诊时的中位年龄为 31 岁(19-72 岁)。大多数患者为女性(63%)和白种人(65%)。89%的患者为 II 期 HL,89%的患者在东部合作肿瘤学组的评分为 0 分或 1 分,35%的患者有 B 型症状,9%的患者有结节外受累。52.8%的患者接受了CMT治疗(57例),47.2%的患者仅接受了CTX治疗(51例)。与单用CTX组相比,CMT组的化疗周期较少(平均周期为5.2 vs 5.7,P = 0.045)。单用CTX组有24例复发,而CMT组无复发。与单用CTX组(47.4%,P < .0001;HR = .03,P < .001)相比,CMT组(100%)10年的RFS明显改善。有必要对毒性比较、晚期和非良性HL进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fifteen-Year Experience of a Single Institution: Outcomes for Early-Stage Hodgkins Lymphoma Comparing Chemotherapy Alone Versus Combined Modality Therapy

Purpose

Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). The use of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in addition to chemotherapy may lead to better survival rates but is controversial because of concerns about long-term toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy alone (CTX alone) versus ABVD with consolidative RT (CMT).

Methods and Materials

A single-institution, retrospective review of patients with HL diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 years, with stage I or II HL, who received ABVD with a complete response with/without CMT. Consolidative RT must have been started within 90 days of completing chemotherapy. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Follow-up details and treatment responses were collected from medical record reviews. Standard statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS).

Results

One hundred and 8 patients with early-stage HL were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 19-72). Most patients were female (63%) and Caucasian (65%). stage II HL was present in 89%of patients, 89% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, 35% had B symptoms, and 9% had extranodal involvement. A total of 52.8% received CMT (n = 57) and 47.2% received CTX alone (n = 51). The CMT group had fewer cycles of chemotherapy compared to the CTX-alone group (mean cycles, 5.2 vs 5.7, P = 0.045). Twenty-four relapse events occurred in the CTX-alone group, while no relapse events occurred in the CMT group. RFS at 10 years was significantly improved in the CMT group (100%) compared to CTX alone (47.4%, P < .0001; HR = .03, P < .001).

Conclusions

ABVD with consolidative RT was associated with improved RFS. Further studies of toxicity comparisons, advanced stages, and nonfavorable HL are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Avasopasem Manganese on Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer in the ROMAN Trial: Unplanned Secondary Analysis A Predictive Nomogram for Development of Lymph Node Metastasis in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases and Concomitant Listeria Monocytogenes Brain Abscesses Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1