{"title":"无结双排肩袖修复术与侧排肱二头肌腱膜切除术和不进行侧排肱二头肌腱膜切除术在 2 年和 5 年后的患者报告结果均有所改善","authors":"Giovanna Medina MD, PhD , Mathew Quattrocelli DO , Natalie Lowenstein BS, MPH , Jamie Collins PhD , Elizabeth Matzkin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to report outcomes of an arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) technique at 2- and 5- years postoperatively, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing knotless DR RCR with incorporated lateral row biceps tenodesis (LRT) vs. those without LRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All primary RCR surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at a single institution using a knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) technique. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was standardized for all patients. The primary outcomes collected included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Function, ASES Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical and mental, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three hundred forty-two patients met inclusion criteria, of which 262 patients underwent isolated RCR and 61 underwent RCR with a concomitant LRT, 15 underwent RCR with concomitant tenotomy and 4 had RCR with débridement of the biceps. Significant improvements in VAS, ASES, SANE, SST, and VR-12 scores were observed at all-time points in all patient groups. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were noted in patients undergoing RCR with a lateral row tenodesis vs. those undergoing RCR alone. Similarly, no differences were seen when stratified by age, sex, body mass index, Worker’s Compensation status, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Based on ASES, 81% of patients met minimum clinically important difference, and 64% met maximal outcome improvement at 1-year postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR significantly improves patient-reported clinical outcomes at 1-, 2- and 5-year follow-ups. These results are reflected in clinical practice because 80% achieve minimum clinically important difference postoperatively. Patient-related factors, including body mass index, age, sex, Worker’s Compensation, and diabetes mellitus do not significantly affect patient-reported outcomes in the first 5 years after surgery. Smokers have worse baseline scores which persist at 2-year follow-up. Lastly, adding an arthroscopic LRT in knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR provides similar clinical outcomes to knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR without biceps tenodesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved patient reported outcomes with knotless double-row rotator cuff repair with and without lateral row biceps tenodesis at 2- and 5-years\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Medina MD, PhD , Mathew Quattrocelli DO , Natalie Lowenstein BS, MPH , Jamie Collins PhD , Elizabeth Matzkin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to report outcomes of an arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) technique at 2- and 5- years postoperatively, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing knotless DR RCR with incorporated lateral row biceps tenodesis (LRT) vs. those without LRT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All primary RCR surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at a single institution using a knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) technique. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was standardized for all patients. The primary outcomes collected included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Function, ASES Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical and mental, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three hundred forty-two patients met inclusion criteria, of which 262 patients underwent isolated RCR and 61 underwent RCR with a concomitant LRT, 15 underwent RCR with concomitant tenotomy and 4 had RCR with débridement of the biceps. Significant improvements in VAS, ASES, SANE, SST, and VR-12 scores were observed at all-time points in all patient groups. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were noted in patients undergoing RCR with a lateral row tenodesis vs. those undergoing RCR alone. Similarly, no differences were seen when stratified by age, sex, body mass index, Worker’s Compensation status, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Based on ASES, 81% of patients met minimum clinically important difference, and 64% met maximal outcome improvement at 1-year postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR significantly improves patient-reported clinical outcomes at 1-, 2- and 5-year follow-ups. These results are reflected in clinical practice because 80% achieve minimum clinically important difference postoperatively. Patient-related factors, including body mass index, age, sex, Worker’s Compensation, and diabetes mellitus do not significantly affect patient-reported outcomes in the first 5 years after surgery. Smokers have worse baseline scores which persist at 2-year follow-up. Lastly, adding an arthroscopic LRT in knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR provides similar clinical outcomes to knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR without biceps tenodesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景本研究的目的是报告关节镜下无结节双排(DR)肩袖修复(RCR)技术在术后2年和5年的疗效,并比较接受无结节DR RCR且合并侧排肱二头肌腱鞘切除术(LRT)的患者与未接受LRT的患者的临床疗效。方法所有初级RCR手术均由一家医疗机构的一名外科医生使用无结节经骨等效(TOE)技术完成。所有患者的术后康复方案都是标准化的。收集的主要结果包括美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)功能、ASES指数、单次数字评估(SANE)、简单肩关节测试(SST)、退伍军人兰德12项健康调查(VR-12)身心和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。结果342名患者符合纳入标准,其中262名患者接受了孤立RCR,61名患者接受了RCR并同时进行了LRT,15名患者接受了RCR并同时进行了腱切开术,4名患者接受了RCR并同时进行了肱二头肌除皱术。所有患者组在所有时间点的 VAS、ASES、SANE、SST 和 VR-12 评分均有显著改善。与单纯接受 RCR 的患者相比,同时接受 RCR 和侧行腱鞘切除术的患者在治疗效果上没有明显的统计学差异。同样,按年龄、性别、体重指数、工伤赔偿状况、吸烟和糖尿病进行分层后也未发现差异。根据 ASES,81% 的患者达到了最小临床重要差异,64% 的患者在术后 1 年达到了最大疗效改善。这些结果反映在临床实践中,因为80%的患者在术后达到了最小临床重要差异。与患者相关的因素,包括体重指数、年龄、性别、工伤赔偿和糖尿病等,对术后前五年的患者报告结果没有明显影响。吸烟者的基线评分较低,这种情况在两年的随访中依然存在。最后,在无结节 DR TOE 关节镜 RCR 中增加关节镜 LRT 可提供与无结节 DR TOE 关节镜 RCR 相似的临床疗效。
Improved patient reported outcomes with knotless double-row rotator cuff repair with and without lateral row biceps tenodesis at 2- and 5-years
Background
The purpose of this study is to report outcomes of an arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) technique at 2- and 5- years postoperatively, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing knotless DR RCR with incorporated lateral row biceps tenodesis (LRT) vs. those without LRT.
Methods
All primary RCR surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at a single institution using a knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) technique. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was standardized for all patients. The primary outcomes collected included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Function, ASES Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical and mental, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.
Results
Three hundred forty-two patients met inclusion criteria, of which 262 patients underwent isolated RCR and 61 underwent RCR with a concomitant LRT, 15 underwent RCR with concomitant tenotomy and 4 had RCR with débridement of the biceps. Significant improvements in VAS, ASES, SANE, SST, and VR-12 scores were observed at all-time points in all patient groups. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were noted in patients undergoing RCR with a lateral row tenodesis vs. those undergoing RCR alone. Similarly, no differences were seen when stratified by age, sex, body mass index, Worker’s Compensation status, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. Based on ASES, 81% of patients met minimum clinically important difference, and 64% met maximal outcome improvement at 1-year postoperatively.
Conclusion
Knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR significantly improves patient-reported clinical outcomes at 1-, 2- and 5-year follow-ups. These results are reflected in clinical practice because 80% achieve minimum clinically important difference postoperatively. Patient-related factors, including body mass index, age, sex, Worker’s Compensation, and diabetes mellitus do not significantly affect patient-reported outcomes in the first 5 years after surgery. Smokers have worse baseline scores which persist at 2-year follow-up. Lastly, adding an arthroscopic LRT in knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR provides similar clinical outcomes to knotless DR TOE arthroscopic RCR without biceps tenodesis.