印度马纳里-莱赫公路沿线喜马拉雅山高地和特提斯岩的天然放射性评估

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13268-9
Jyoti Yadav, Rajesh Beniwal, Pushpendra P. Singh, Paramjeet Singh, Ranjeet Dalal
{"title":"印度马纳里-莱赫公路沿线喜马拉雅山高地和特提斯岩的天然放射性评估","authors":"Jyoti Yadav,&nbsp;Rajesh Beniwal,&nbsp;Pushpendra P. Singh,&nbsp;Paramjeet Singh,&nbsp;Ranjeet Dalal","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13268-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Higher and Tethys Himalayan region of NW-Himalaya is less explored from the natural radioactivity mapping assessment, though geologically and tectonically, this region is still active. The concentration of primordial radionuclides (<sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K) in rock samples of the Manali-Leh Highway region of the Himalayas is determined in the present study using the HPGe detector. The radiological hazard parameters are also estimated in terms of radium equivalent activity (Ra<sub>eq</sub>), annual effective dose (<i>E</i><sub>in</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>out</sub>), hazard indices (<i>H</i><sub>in</sub>, <i>H</i><sub>ex</sub>, <i>H</i><sub>α</sub>, and <i>H</i><sub>γ</sub>), and gamma absorbed dose rate. SEM–EDS analysis was used to understand the mineralogical composition of the rocks. The activity concentration of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K radionuclides varies from 1.4 ± 0.9 to 25.3 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 0.5 to 59.6 ± 1.6, and BDL (below detection limit) to 830.3 ± 45.7 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>, with an average value of 13.0 ± 1.0, 21.7 ± 1.0, and 243.7 ± 25.2 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The average of Ra<sub>eq</sub> in the study region lies within the safe limit of 370 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>. The hazard indices have values &lt; 1, indicating no radiological hazards to the population from the rocks. The annual effective dose also has values less than the global average value. This study revealed that the rocks of the Higher Himalayan region have a higher concentration of natural radioactivity, while the Tethys Himalayan rocks have lower concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K radionuclides. The origin of rocks from different lithologies may be the reason for the natural radioactivity variation. The average concentrations of primordial radionuclides in the region are within the world average indicating that the rocks of the region are safe to be used for different purposes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of natural radioactivity in the Higher and Tethys Himalayan Rocks along Manali-Leh Highway, India\",\"authors\":\"Jyoti Yadav,&nbsp;Rajesh Beniwal,&nbsp;Pushpendra P. Singh,&nbsp;Paramjeet Singh,&nbsp;Ranjeet Dalal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-024-13268-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Higher and Tethys Himalayan region of NW-Himalaya is less explored from the natural radioactivity mapping assessment, though geologically and tectonically, this region is still active. The concentration of primordial radionuclides (<sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K) in rock samples of the Manali-Leh Highway region of the Himalayas is determined in the present study using the HPGe detector. The radiological hazard parameters are also estimated in terms of radium equivalent activity (Ra<sub>eq</sub>), annual effective dose (<i>E</i><sub>in</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>out</sub>), hazard indices (<i>H</i><sub>in</sub>, <i>H</i><sub>ex</sub>, <i>H</i><sub>α</sub>, and <i>H</i><sub>γ</sub>), and gamma absorbed dose rate. SEM–EDS analysis was used to understand the mineralogical composition of the rocks. The activity concentration of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K radionuclides varies from 1.4 ± 0.9 to 25.3 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 0.5 to 59.6 ± 1.6, and BDL (below detection limit) to 830.3 ± 45.7 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>, with an average value of 13.0 ± 1.0, 21.7 ± 1.0, and 243.7 ± 25.2 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The average of Ra<sub>eq</sub> in the study region lies within the safe limit of 370 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>. The hazard indices have values &lt; 1, indicating no radiological hazards to the population from the rocks. The annual effective dose also has values less than the global average value. This study revealed that the rocks of the Higher Himalayan region have a higher concentration of natural radioactivity, while the Tethys Himalayan rocks have lower concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup> K radionuclides. The origin of rocks from different lithologies may be the reason for the natural radioactivity variation. The average concentrations of primordial radionuclides in the region are within the world average indicating that the rocks of the region are safe to be used for different purposes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"196 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13268-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13268-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管从地质和构造角度来看,喜马拉雅山西北部的喜马拉雅高地和特提斯地区仍然十分活跃,但从天然放射性绘图评估的角度来看,对这一地区的勘探较少。本研究使用 HPGe 探测器测定了喜马拉雅山脉 Manali-Leh 公路地区岩石样本中原始放射性核素(226Ra、232Th 和 40K)的浓度。此外,还估算了镭当量活度(Raeq)、年有效剂量(Ein 和 Eout)、危害指数(Hin、Hex、Hα 和 Hγ)以及伽马吸收剂量率等放射性危害参数。扫描电镜-电子显微镜分析用于了解岩石的矿物成分。226Ra、232Th和40K放射性核素的放射性活度濃度分別介乎1.4±0.9至25.3±1.2、0.7±0.5至59.6±1.6和BDL(低於檢測限)至830.3±45.7 Bq kg-1,平均值分別為13.0±1.0、21.7±1.0和243.7±25.2 Bq kg-1。研究区域的平均 Raeq 值在 370 Bq kg-1 的安全限值之内。危害指数值为 1,表明岩石不会对居民造成辐射危害。年有效剂量值也低于全球平均值。这项研究显示,高喜马拉雅地区的岩石天然放射性浓度较高,而特提斯喜马拉雅地区岩石的 226Ra、232Th 和 40 K 放射性核素浓度较低。不同岩性的岩石可能是造成天然放射性差异的原因。该地区原始放射性核素的平均浓度在世界平均水平之内,表明该地区的岩石可安全地用于不同目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of natural radioactivity in the Higher and Tethys Himalayan Rocks along Manali-Leh Highway, India

The Higher and Tethys Himalayan region of NW-Himalaya is less explored from the natural radioactivity mapping assessment, though geologically and tectonically, this region is still active. The concentration of primordial radionuclides (226Ra, 232Th, and 40 K) in rock samples of the Manali-Leh Highway region of the Himalayas is determined in the present study using the HPGe detector. The radiological hazard parameters are also estimated in terms of radium equivalent activity (Raeq), annual effective dose (Ein and Eout), hazard indices (Hin, Hex, Hα, and Hγ), and gamma absorbed dose rate. SEM–EDS analysis was used to understand the mineralogical composition of the rocks. The activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40 K radionuclides varies from 1.4 ± 0.9 to 25.3 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 0.5 to 59.6 ± 1.6, and BDL (below detection limit) to 830.3 ± 45.7 Bq kg−1, with an average value of 13.0 ± 1.0, 21.7 ± 1.0, and 243.7 ± 25.2 Bq kg−1, respectively. The average of Raeq in the study region lies within the safe limit of 370 Bq kg−1. The hazard indices have values < 1, indicating no radiological hazards to the population from the rocks. The annual effective dose also has values less than the global average value. This study revealed that the rocks of the Higher Himalayan region have a higher concentration of natural radioactivity, while the Tethys Himalayan rocks have lower concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40 K radionuclides. The origin of rocks from different lithologies may be the reason for the natural radioactivity variation. The average concentrations of primordial radionuclides in the region are within the world average indicating that the rocks of the region are safe to be used for different purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal(loid)s pollution in soils of a typical agricultural and rural area: Source apportionment and derived risk quantification Spatial distribution patterns and hotspots of extreme agro-climatic resources in the Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia Health risks and pathological effects of heavy metals in Oreochromis mossambicus from Usuma River, Nigeria Comprehensive assessment of fish diversity and water health in river Indus, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Enhanced removal of methyl orange and malachite green using mesoporous TO@CTAB nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization, optimization and real wastewater treatment efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1