在患者门户网站在线使用 AUDIT-C 时显示出可靠性

Alison Knopf
{"title":"在患者门户网站在线使用 AUDIT-C 时显示出可靠性","authors":"Alison Knopf","doi":"10.1002/adaw.34301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) is a validated screen, but until recently has not been evaluated in routine conditions for adult primary care patients. A new study has found that AUDIT-C screens have “excellent” test-retest reliability, which assesses the consistency of results when given at two different times. Excellent test-retest reliability means that there are similar results across separate test administrations, and the study, supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), shows that the AUDIT-C can be used reliably in adult primary care patients. The study, led by Claire B. Simon, M.D., of the University of Washington in Seattle, used electronic health record (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente. For the study, more than 18,000 adult primary care patients completed two AUDIT-C screens at 1 to 21 days apart as part of routine care in 2021. Screen results were reliable whether completed in person or online through patient portals. However, reliability was higher when the patient completed both screens using online patient portals, compared to completing both screens in the clinic or one in the clinic and one online. Therefore, completing two screens may be a better option than just doing one. The study, High test–retest reliability of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire completed by primary care patients in routine care, is published in the February 2024 issue of Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research. The researchers also found that reliability was lower for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients and multiracial patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":100073,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","volume":"36 41","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AUDIT-C shows reliability when used online in patient portals\",\"authors\":\"Alison Knopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/adaw.34301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) is a validated screen, but until recently has not been evaluated in routine conditions for adult primary care patients. A new study has found that AUDIT-C screens have “excellent” test-retest reliability, which assesses the consistency of results when given at two different times. Excellent test-retest reliability means that there are similar results across separate test administrations, and the study, supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), shows that the AUDIT-C can be used reliably in adult primary care patients. The study, led by Claire B. Simon, M.D., of the University of Washington in Seattle, used electronic health record (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente. For the study, more than 18,000 adult primary care patients completed two AUDIT-C screens at 1 to 21 days apart as part of routine care in 2021. Screen results were reliable whether completed in person or online through patient portals. However, reliability was higher when the patient completed both screens using online patient portals, compared to completing both screens in the clinic or one in the clinic and one online. Therefore, completing two screens may be a better option than just doing one. The study, High test–retest reliability of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire completed by primary care patients in routine care, is published in the February 2024 issue of Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research. The researchers also found that reliability was lower for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients and multiracial patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"volume\":\"36 41\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adaw.34301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费(AUDIT-C)是一种经过验证的筛查方法,但直到最近还没有在常规情况下对成人初级保健患者进行过评估。一项新的研究发现,AUDIT-C 筛查具有 "极佳 "的重测可靠性,即评估在两个不同时间进行测试时结果的一致性。这项由美国国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所(NIAAA)支持的研究表明,AUDIT-C 可以可靠地用于成人初级保健患者。这项研究由西雅图华盛顿大学医学博士克莱尔-B-西蒙(Claire B. Simon)领导,使用了凯撒医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据。在这项研究中,18000 多名成人初级保健患者完成了两次 AUDIT-C 筛查,时间间隔为 1 到 21 天,作为 2021 年常规保健的一部分。无论是亲自完成还是通过患者门户在线完成,筛查结果都是可靠的。不过,与在诊所完成两次筛查或在诊所完成一次筛查和在线完成一次筛查相比,患者使用在线患者门户完成两次筛查的可靠性更高。因此,完成两个筛查可能比只做一个筛查更好。这项题为 "初级保健患者在日常护理中完成的酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费(AUDIT-C)问卷的高重复测试可靠性 "的研究发表在 2024 年 2 月的《酒精、临床和实验研究》(Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research)杂志上。研究人员还发现,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)患者和多种族患者的可靠性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AUDIT-C shows reliability when used online in patient portals

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) is a validated screen, but until recently has not been evaluated in routine conditions for adult primary care patients. A new study has found that AUDIT-C screens have “excellent” test-retest reliability, which assesses the consistency of results when given at two different times. Excellent test-retest reliability means that there are similar results across separate test administrations, and the study, supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), shows that the AUDIT-C can be used reliably in adult primary care patients. The study, led by Claire B. Simon, M.D., of the University of Washington in Seattle, used electronic health record (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente. For the study, more than 18,000 adult primary care patients completed two AUDIT-C screens at 1 to 21 days apart as part of routine care in 2021. Screen results were reliable whether completed in person or online through patient portals. However, reliability was higher when the patient completed both screens using online patient portals, compared to completing both screens in the clinic or one in the clinic and one online. Therefore, completing two screens may be a better option than just doing one. The study, High test–retest reliability of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire completed by primary care patients in routine care, is published in the February 2024 issue of Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research. The researchers also found that reliability was lower for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients and multiracial patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some thoughts for the new federal administration Two JAMA studies delve into helping drug users with harm reduction Findings on weight-loss drugs offer hope, but caution needed Coming Up… AMERSA meeting: OUD, AUD and reflections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1