Stephanie Francalancia, Mary Lou, Damon McIntire, Nikhil Sobti, Brooke Barrow, Josué Marquez-Garcia, Daniel Kwan, Rachel Sullivan, Paul Liu, Karl Breuing
{"title":"乳房缩小整形术后乳头乳晕复合体敏感度永久性降低的评估","authors":"Stephanie Francalancia, Mary Lou, Damon McIntire, Nikhil Sobti, Brooke Barrow, Josué Marquez-Garcia, Daniel Kwan, Rachel Sullivan, Paul Liu, Karl Breuing","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictors for permanent nipple-areola complex (NAC) insensitivity after reduction mammoplasty are sparsely defined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyze factors associated with NAC insensitivity over a long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of reduction mammoplasties on 1598 breasts performed by four surgeons from March 2015-February 2023 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative factors, and postoperative complications were collected from patient records. Analysis was conducted by breast, separated into breasts with NAC insensitivity (permanent and transient) and those without. Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables evaluated differences between the groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed the association of pedicle choice with NAC insensitivity onset and permanence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1598 breasts, 9.8% had loss of NAC sensation, of which 49.0% had permanent loss. 51.0% regained sensitivity, taking an average of 116 days (median 64, range 6-798) to regain sensation. NAC-insensitive breasts had a longer sternal notch-NAC (p<0.001) and NAC-IMF (p<0.001) measurements, greater weight removed (p<0.001), and fat necrosis co-complication (p=0.022). Greater weight removed (p=0.044) and longer sternal notch-NAC measurements (p=0.011) were associated with permanent insensitivity. The superomedial pedicle was associated with an increased rate of transient NAC insensitivity, while the inferior pedicle with a decreased rate. There was no significant association between pedicle choices and permanent insensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transient loss of NAC sensitivity is associated with pedicle choice, while breasts with permanent insensitivity were more likely to have longer breast measurements and a greater amount of tissue removed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Permanent Nipple-Areola Complex Sensitivity Loss Following Reduction Mammoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Francalancia, Mary Lou, Damon McIntire, Nikhil Sobti, Brooke Barrow, Josué Marquez-Garcia, Daniel Kwan, Rachel Sullivan, Paul Liu, Karl Breuing\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictors for permanent nipple-areola complex (NAC) insensitivity after reduction mammoplasty are sparsely defined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analyze factors associated with NAC insensitivity over a long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of reduction mammoplasties on 1598 breasts performed by four surgeons from March 2015-February 2023 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative factors, and postoperative complications were collected from patient records. Analysis was conducted by breast, separated into breasts with NAC insensitivity (permanent and transient) and those without. Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables evaluated differences between the groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed the association of pedicle choice with NAC insensitivity onset and permanence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1598 breasts, 9.8% had loss of NAC sensation, of which 49.0% had permanent loss. 51.0% regained sensitivity, taking an average of 116 days (median 64, range 6-798) to regain sensation. NAC-insensitive breasts had a longer sternal notch-NAC (p<0.001) and NAC-IMF (p<0.001) measurements, greater weight removed (p<0.001), and fat necrosis co-complication (p=0.022). Greater weight removed (p=0.044) and longer sternal notch-NAC measurements (p=0.011) were associated with permanent insensitivity. The superomedial pedicle was associated with an increased rate of transient NAC insensitivity, while the inferior pedicle with a decreased rate. There was no significant association between pedicle choices and permanent insensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transient loss of NAC sensitivity is associated with pedicle choice, while breasts with permanent insensitivity were more likely to have longer breast measurements and a greater amount of tissue removed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Permanent Nipple-Areola Complex Sensitivity Loss Following Reduction Mammoplasty.
Background: Predictors for permanent nipple-areola complex (NAC) insensitivity after reduction mammoplasty are sparsely defined.
Objectives: We analyze factors associated with NAC insensitivity over a long-term follow-up.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of reduction mammoplasties on 1598 breasts performed by four surgeons from March 2015-February 2023 was conducted. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative factors, and postoperative complications were collected from patient records. Analysis was conducted by breast, separated into breasts with NAC insensitivity (permanent and transient) and those without. Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables evaluated differences between the groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed the association of pedicle choice with NAC insensitivity onset and permanence.
Results: Of 1598 breasts, 9.8% had loss of NAC sensation, of which 49.0% had permanent loss. 51.0% regained sensitivity, taking an average of 116 days (median 64, range 6-798) to regain sensation. NAC-insensitive breasts had a longer sternal notch-NAC (p<0.001) and NAC-IMF (p<0.001) measurements, greater weight removed (p<0.001), and fat necrosis co-complication (p=0.022). Greater weight removed (p=0.044) and longer sternal notch-NAC measurements (p=0.011) were associated with permanent insensitivity. The superomedial pedicle was associated with an increased rate of transient NAC insensitivity, while the inferior pedicle with a decreased rate. There was no significant association between pedicle choices and permanent insensitivity.
Conclusions: Transient loss of NAC sensitivity is associated with pedicle choice, while breasts with permanent insensitivity were more likely to have longer breast measurements and a greater amount of tissue removed.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.