脂肪水肿吸脂术后与健康相关的生活质量和症状的改善:一项纵向研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004124
Vasu Karri
{"title":"脂肪水肿吸脂术后与健康相关的生活质量和症状的改善:一项纵向研究","authors":"Vasu Karri","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipedema is a chronic fat disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition in the lower limbs, leading to pain, mobility issues and reduced health related quality of life (HRQoL).There is growing evidence that liposuction of the excess fat not only reduces soft tissue pain but also improves HRQoL. The published data, however, remain limited, and there are no studies of liposuction in the UK lipedema population. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of liposuction on HRQoL and symptoms in UK lipedema patients using 2 HRQoL instruments and a Lipedema Symptom Scale.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>Lipedema patients undergoing liposuction between January 2016 and December 2021 completed Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and 17-question Lipedema Symptom Scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Paired t test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative mean scores of the different domains of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF and preoperative and postoperative mean scores for the lipedema symptom scale. Paired t test was also used to compare preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores to age-matched normative data for the English population to assess the extent of HRQoL improvement relative to the general population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six women were included in the study with a mean age of 46.4 ± 12 years. Mean follow-up (interval between first liposuction surgery and postoperative completion of the instruments) was 25.3 ± 23.2 months. There was significant improvement in all SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF domains postoperatively (P < 0.001). Compared with age-matched normative data, postoperative SF-36 scores remained lower in physical functioning, social functioning, and general health. Postoperative results also showed a highly significant improvement (P < 0.001) across all 17 items of the Lipedema Symptom Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This longitudinal study indicates liposuction is an effective treatment for improving HRQoL and symptoms in lipedema patients, although it may not completely restore HRQoL to normative levels. Limitations include potential selection bias, sampling bias, and the need for longer follow-up. The findings support liposuction as a first-line treatment for lipedema and could inform decision-making for both patients and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms Following Lipedema Liposuction: A Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vasu Karri\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipedema is a chronic fat disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition in the lower limbs, leading to pain, mobility issues and reduced health related quality of life (HRQoL).There is growing evidence that liposuction of the excess fat not only reduces soft tissue pain but also improves HRQoL. The published data, however, remain limited, and there are no studies of liposuction in the UK lipedema population. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of liposuction on HRQoL and symptoms in UK lipedema patients using 2 HRQoL instruments and a Lipedema Symptom Scale.</p><p><strong>Patient and methods: </strong>Lipedema patients undergoing liposuction between January 2016 and December 2021 completed Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and 17-question Lipedema Symptom Scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Paired t test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative mean scores of the different domains of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF and preoperative and postoperative mean scores for the lipedema symptom scale. Paired t test was also used to compare preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores to age-matched normative data for the English population to assess the extent of HRQoL improvement relative to the general population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six women were included in the study with a mean age of 46.4 ± 12 years. Mean follow-up (interval between first liposuction surgery and postoperative completion of the instruments) was 25.3 ± 23.2 months. There was significant improvement in all SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF domains postoperatively (P < 0.001). Compared with age-matched normative data, postoperative SF-36 scores remained lower in physical functioning, social functioning, and general health. Postoperative results also showed a highly significant improvement (P < 0.001) across all 17 items of the Lipedema Symptom Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This longitudinal study indicates liposuction is an effective treatment for improving HRQoL and symptoms in lipedema patients, although it may not completely restore HRQoL to normative levels. Limitations include potential selection bias, sampling bias, and the need for longer follow-up. The findings support liposuction as a first-line treatment for lipedema and could inform decision-making for both patients and policymakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂肪性水肿是一种慢性脂肪疾病,其特点是脂肪不成比例地沉积在下肢,导致疼痛、行动不便和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)下降。然而,已发表的数据仍然有限,也没有针对英国脂肪性水肿人群的吸脂研究。本研究旨在使用两种 HRQoL 工具和脂肪性水肿症状量表,评估脂肪抽吸术对英国脂肪性水肿患者的 HRQoL 和症状的影响:2016年1月至2021年12月期间接受吸脂术的脂肪性水肿患者在术前和术后完成了短表健康调查(SF-36)、世界卫生组织生活质量评估(WHOQOL-BREF)和17个问题的脂肪性水肿症状量表。采用配对 t 检验比较 SF-36 和 WHOQOL-BREF 不同领域的术前和术后平均得分,以及脂肪性水肿症状量表的术前和术后平均得分。此外,还使用配对t检验将术前和术后的SF-36评分与英国人口的年龄匹配常模数据进行比较,以评估相对于普通人口的HRQoL改善程度:研究共纳入 76 名女性,平均年龄为 46.4 ± 12 岁。平均随访时间(从首次吸脂手术到术后完成仪器操作的时间间隔)为 25.3 ± 23.2 个月。术后,SF-36 和 WHOQOL-BREF 各项指标均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。与年龄匹配的常模数据相比,术后 SF-36 在身体功能、社会功能和一般健康方面的得分仍然较低。术后结果还显示,脂肪性水肿症状量表的所有 17 个项目都有非常显著的改善(P < 0.001):这项纵向研究表明,吸脂术是改善脂肪性水肿患者 HRQoL 和症状的有效治疗方法,尽管它可能无法将 HRQoL 完全恢复到正常水平。不足之处包括潜在的选择偏差、抽样偏差以及需要更长时间的随访。研究结果支持将吸脂术作为脂肪性水肿的一线治疗方法,并可为患者和决策者的决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms Following Lipedema Liposuction: A Longitudinal Study.

Background: Lipedema is a chronic fat disorder characterized by disproportionate fat deposition in the lower limbs, leading to pain, mobility issues and reduced health related quality of life (HRQoL).There is growing evidence that liposuction of the excess fat not only reduces soft tissue pain but also improves HRQoL. The published data, however, remain limited, and there are no studies of liposuction in the UK lipedema population. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of liposuction on HRQoL and symptoms in UK lipedema patients using 2 HRQoL instruments and a Lipedema Symptom Scale.

Patient and methods: Lipedema patients undergoing liposuction between January 2016 and December 2021 completed Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and 17-question Lipedema Symptom Scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Paired t test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative mean scores of the different domains of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF and preoperative and postoperative mean scores for the lipedema symptom scale. Paired t test was also used to compare preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores to age-matched normative data for the English population to assess the extent of HRQoL improvement relative to the general population.

Results: Seventy-six women were included in the study with a mean age of 46.4 ± 12 years. Mean follow-up (interval between first liposuction surgery and postoperative completion of the instruments) was 25.3 ± 23.2 months. There was significant improvement in all SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF domains postoperatively (P < 0.001). Compared with age-matched normative data, postoperative SF-36 scores remained lower in physical functioning, social functioning, and general health. Postoperative results also showed a highly significant improvement (P < 0.001) across all 17 items of the Lipedema Symptom Scale.

Conclusion: This longitudinal study indicates liposuction is an effective treatment for improving HRQoL and symptoms in lipedema patients, although it may not completely restore HRQoL to normative levels. Limitations include potential selection bias, sampling bias, and the need for longer follow-up. The findings support liposuction as a first-line treatment for lipedema and could inform decision-making for both patients and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Application Discrepancies in the 2023-2024 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Facial Artery Branch Thrombolysis for Nasal Vascular Embolism Induced by Hyaluronic Acid Injection. Management of Delayed Vascular Occlusion in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report. Management of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation-Associated Groin Wound Complications With Muscle Flaps at a High-Acuity Cardiac Referral Center. Micro/Nanobubble-Assisted Lipotransfer: In Vivo Evidence of Improved Graft Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1