Caroline Lenz, Lara Gesemann, Yussor Al-Baldawi, Michael Püsken, Amelie Wingels, Peter Mallmann, Constanze Amir-Karibian, Janice K Jeschke, Jana Adams, Bernd Morgenstern, Fabinshy Thangarajah
{"title":"术前磁共振成像预测宫颈癌患者病理 T 分期的准确性","authors":"Caroline Lenz, Lara Gesemann, Yussor Al-Baldawi, Michael Püsken, Amelie Wingels, Peter Mallmann, Constanze Amir-Karibian, Janice K Jeschke, Jana Adams, Bernd Morgenstern, Fabinshy Thangarajah","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The trend in today's surgical gynecological oncology is to provide equal oncological safety with less radical surgery. The SHAPE trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a simple hysterectomy compared to a radical hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer. As a result, the accuracy of preoperative diagnostics has become increasingly important to avoid both under- and overtreatment. The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of MRI-based T-stage.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients who were surgically treated for an initial diagnosis of a primary cervical carcinoma at the University Hospital Cologne in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics between 2015 and 2021 were included in the study. All patients underwent MRI prior to their surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 44.4% of cases, the pathological tumor size in the surgical specimen was consistent with the preoperative tumor size determined by MRI. In 28.9% of the cases, MRI overestimated the final pathologic T-stage while in 26.7% of cases, MRI underestimated it. Furthermore, we were able to show that overall survival was significantly poorer (p<0.05) in patients whose preoperative MRI had underestimated the final T-stage in our study cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative MRI diagnostics alone are not reliable enough for accurate T-stage estimation. Multimodal diagnostic approaches are essential for accurate preoperative staging. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate preoperative staging strategies to optimize sizing accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"44 11","pages":"5081-5085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Preoperative Magnet Resonance Imaging to Predict Pathologic T-Stage in Patients With Cervical Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Lenz, Lara Gesemann, Yussor Al-Baldawi, Michael Püsken, Amelie Wingels, Peter Mallmann, Constanze Amir-Karibian, Janice K Jeschke, Jana Adams, Bernd Morgenstern, Fabinshy Thangarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The trend in today's surgical gynecological oncology is to provide equal oncological safety with less radical surgery. The SHAPE trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a simple hysterectomy compared to a radical hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer. As a result, the accuracy of preoperative diagnostics has become increasingly important to avoid both under- and overtreatment. The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of MRI-based T-stage.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients who were surgically treated for an initial diagnosis of a primary cervical carcinoma at the University Hospital Cologne in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics between 2015 and 2021 were included in the study. All patients underwent MRI prior to their surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 44.4% of cases, the pathological tumor size in the surgical specimen was consistent with the preoperative tumor size determined by MRI. In 28.9% of the cases, MRI overestimated the final pathologic T-stage while in 26.7% of cases, MRI underestimated it. Furthermore, we were able to show that overall survival was significantly poorer (p<0.05) in patients whose preoperative MRI had underestimated the final T-stage in our study cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative MRI diagnostics alone are not reliable enough for accurate T-stage estimation. Multimodal diagnostic approaches are essential for accurate preoperative staging. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate preoperative staging strategies to optimize sizing accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"5081-5085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:当今妇科肿瘤手术的趋势是以较少的根治性手术提供同等的肿瘤安全性。SHAPE 试验证明,在低风险宫颈癌中,单纯子宫切除术与根治性子宫切除术相比并无劣势。因此,为避免治疗不足和过度,术前诊断的准确性变得越来越重要。本研究旨在探讨基于核磁共振成像的T分期的准确性:研究纳入了 45 名在 2015 年至 2021 年期间在科隆大学医院妇产科因初步诊断为原发性宫颈癌而接受手术治疗的患者。所有患者在手术治疗前均接受了核磁共振成像检查:在44.4%的病例中,手术标本中的病理肿瘤大小与核磁共振成像确定的术前肿瘤大小一致。在 28.9% 的病例中,核磁共振成像高估了最终的病理 T 分期,而在 26.7% 的病例中,核磁共振成像低估了最终的病理 T 分期。此外,我们还发现总生存率明显较低(p 结论:仅靠术前磁共振成像诊断不足以准确估计T分期。多模态诊断方法对于准确的术前分期至关重要。需要进行前瞻性试验来评估术前分期策略,以优化分期的准确性。
Accuracy of Preoperative Magnet Resonance Imaging to Predict Pathologic T-Stage in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Background/aim: The trend in today's surgical gynecological oncology is to provide equal oncological safety with less radical surgery. The SHAPE trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a simple hysterectomy compared to a radical hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer. As a result, the accuracy of preoperative diagnostics has become increasingly important to avoid both under- and overtreatment. The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of MRI-based T-stage.
Patients and methods: Forty-five patients who were surgically treated for an initial diagnosis of a primary cervical carcinoma at the University Hospital Cologne in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics between 2015 and 2021 were included in the study. All patients underwent MRI prior to their surgical treatment.
Results: In 44.4% of cases, the pathological tumor size in the surgical specimen was consistent with the preoperative tumor size determined by MRI. In 28.9% of the cases, MRI overestimated the final pathologic T-stage while in 26.7% of cases, MRI underestimated it. Furthermore, we were able to show that overall survival was significantly poorer (p<0.05) in patients whose preoperative MRI had underestimated the final T-stage in our study cohort.
Conclusion: Preoperative MRI diagnostics alone are not reliable enough for accurate T-stage estimation. Multimodal diagnostic approaches are essential for accurate preoperative staging. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate preoperative staging strategies to optimize sizing accuracy.
期刊介绍:
ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed.
ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies).
Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.