接受双联抗血小板疗法的急性冠状动脉综合征患者心导管插入术后血小板反应性与 MACE 的关系:一项 Meta 分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Epub Date: 2024-10-27 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0370
Jiabing Wang, Xingliang Shi, Liuqing Chen, Ting Li, Chenttao Wu, Mingwu Hu
{"title":"接受双联抗血小板疗法的急性冠状动脉综合征患者心导管插入术后血小板反应性与 MACE 的关系:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Jiabing Wang, Xingliang Shi, Liuqing Chen, Ting Li, Chenttao Wu, Mingwu Hu","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim/Background</b> Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a condition characterized by acute cardiac ischemia, is among the major causes of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, whether there is a correlation between platelet reactivity and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains debatable, and whether platelet function tests should be tailored for ACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still under discussion. This study aims to investigate the relationship between platelet reactivity and the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients post-PCI and to discuss the implications of these findings. <b>Methods</b> Clinical studies on 'PCI, ACS, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), platelet reactivity, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)' up to 31 October 2023, were systematically collected from Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Twelve articles meeting predefined criteria were selected. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane, London, UK) and Stata 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) to compute pooled effect sizes, assess heterogeneity, explore sources of heterogeneity, and evaluate publication bias. <b>Results</b> Twelve articles consisting of 9297 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that ACS patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) who received PCI and used DAPT for 1-2 years had a greater risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.46) compared to those with low platelet reactivity. Moreover, greater platelet reactivity was associated independently with all-cause mortality (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.63-3.12), cardiac mortality (RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.16-3.8), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.5), in-stent restenosis (RR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.22-2.87), as well as stroke (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.02-2.57), but not with coronary revascularization events (RR = 0.99, <i>p =</i> 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.24). On the other hand, meta-regression revealed that region (<i>p</i> = 0.99), type of ACS patient (<i>p</i> = 0.16), drug regimen (<i>p</i> = 0.48), testing method (<i>p</i> = 0.51), sampling time (<i>p</i> = 0.70), follow-up time (<i>p</i> = 0.45), and PCI protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.27) were not sources of heterogeneity in the study. <b>Conclusion</b> The meta-analysis outcomes indicate that in ACS patients receiving PCI and using dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-2 years, HPR was independently positively correlated with major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause (or cardiac) mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, and stroke. This suggests that platelet reactivity testing has clinical and translational significance in predicting patients' risk of adverse cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"85 10","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet Reactivity with MACE in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Post-PCI under Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiabing Wang, Xingliang Shi, Liuqing Chen, Ting Li, Chenttao Wu, Mingwu Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/hmed.2024.0370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim/Background</b> Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a condition characterized by acute cardiac ischemia, is among the major causes of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, whether there is a correlation between platelet reactivity and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains debatable, and whether platelet function tests should be tailored for ACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still under discussion. This study aims to investigate the relationship between platelet reactivity and the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients post-PCI and to discuss the implications of these findings. <b>Methods</b> Clinical studies on 'PCI, ACS, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), platelet reactivity, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)' up to 31 October 2023, were systematically collected from Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Twelve articles meeting predefined criteria were selected. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane, London, UK) and Stata 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) to compute pooled effect sizes, assess heterogeneity, explore sources of heterogeneity, and evaluate publication bias. <b>Results</b> Twelve articles consisting of 9297 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that ACS patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) who received PCI and used DAPT for 1-2 years had a greater risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.46) compared to those with low platelet reactivity. Moreover, greater platelet reactivity was associated independently with all-cause mortality (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.63-3.12), cardiac mortality (RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.16-3.8), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.5), in-stent restenosis (RR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.22-2.87), as well as stroke (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.02-2.57), but not with coronary revascularization events (RR = 0.99, <i>p =</i> 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.24). On the other hand, meta-regression revealed that region (<i>p</i> = 0.99), type of ACS patient (<i>p</i> = 0.16), drug regimen (<i>p</i> = 0.48), testing method (<i>p</i> = 0.51), sampling time (<i>p</i> = 0.70), follow-up time (<i>p</i> = 0.45), and PCI protocol (<i>p</i> = 0.27) were not sources of heterogeneity in the study. <b>Conclusion</b> The meta-analysis outcomes indicate that in ACS patients receiving PCI and using dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-2 years, HPR was independently positively correlated with major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause (or cardiac) mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, and stroke. This suggests that platelet reactivity testing has clinical and translational significance in predicting patients' risk of adverse cardiovascular events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"85 10\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0370\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景 急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是一种以急性心脏缺血为特征的疾病,是心血管疾病(CVD)的主要死因之一。然而,血小板反应性与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间是否存在相关性仍有争议,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的急性冠状动脉综合征患者是否应进行有针对性的血小板功能检测也仍在讨论之中。本研究旨在探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后 ACS 患者的血小板反应性与 MACE 发生率之间的关系,并讨论这些发现的意义。方法 系统地从 Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆收集了截至 2023 年 10 月 31 日有关 "PCI、ACS、双联抗血小板疗法 (DAPT)、血小板反应性、主要不良心血管事件 (MACE) "的临床研究。筛选出符合预定标准的 12 篇文章。使用Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane, London, UK)和Stata 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA)进行Meta分析,以计算汇集效应大小、评估异质性、探索异质性来源并评估发表偏倚。结果 共纳入12篇文章,9 297名患者。荟萃分析表明,与血小板反应性低的患者相比,接受 PCI 并使用 DAPT 1-2 年的高血小板反应性 (HPR) ACS 患者发生 MACE 的风险更高(风险比 (RR) = 1.79,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.30-2.46)。此外,较高的血小板反应性与全因死亡率(RR = 2.26,95% CI:1.63-3.12)、心脏死亡率(RR = 2.87,95% CI:2.16-3.8)、心肌梗死(RR = 1.98,95% CI:1.53-2.5)、支架内再狭窄(RR = 1.87,95% CI:1.22-2.87)以及中风(RR = 1.62,95% CI:1.02-2.57),但与冠状动脉血运重建事件无关(RR = 0.99,P = 0.96,95% CI:0.80-1.24)。另一方面,荟萃回归显示,地区(p = 0.99)、ACS 患者类型(p = 0.16)、药物方案(p = 0.48)、检测方法(p = 0.51)、取样时间(p = 0.70)、随访时间(p = 0.45)和 PCI 方案(p = 0.27)不是研究中的异质性来源。结论 荟萃分析结果表明,在接受 PCI 并使用双联抗血小板疗法 1-2 年的 ACS 患者中,HPR 与主要不良心血管事件、全因(或心源性)死亡率、复发性心肌梗死、支架内再狭窄和中风呈独立正相关。这表明血小板反应性检测在预测患者不良心血管事件风险方面具有临床和转化意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platelet Reactivity with MACE in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Post-PCI under Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

Aim/Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a condition characterized by acute cardiac ischemia, is among the major causes of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, whether there is a correlation between platelet reactivity and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains debatable, and whether platelet function tests should be tailored for ACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still under discussion. This study aims to investigate the relationship between platelet reactivity and the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients post-PCI and to discuss the implications of these findings. Methods Clinical studies on 'PCI, ACS, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), platelet reactivity, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)' up to 31 October 2023, were systematically collected from Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Twelve articles meeting predefined criteria were selected. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane, London, UK) and Stata 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) to compute pooled effect sizes, assess heterogeneity, explore sources of heterogeneity, and evaluate publication bias. Results Twelve articles consisting of 9297 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that ACS patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) who received PCI and used DAPT for 1-2 years had a greater risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.46) compared to those with low platelet reactivity. Moreover, greater platelet reactivity was associated independently with all-cause mortality (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.63-3.12), cardiac mortality (RR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.16-3.8), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.5), in-stent restenosis (RR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.22-2.87), as well as stroke (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.02-2.57), but not with coronary revascularization events (RR = 0.99, p = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.24). On the other hand, meta-regression revealed that region (p = 0.99), type of ACS patient (p = 0.16), drug regimen (p = 0.48), testing method (p = 0.51), sampling time (p = 0.70), follow-up time (p = 0.45), and PCI protocol (p = 0.27) were not sources of heterogeneity in the study. Conclusion The meta-analysis outcomes indicate that in ACS patients receiving PCI and using dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-2 years, HPR was independently positively correlated with major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause (or cardiac) mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, in-stent restenosis, and stroke. This suggests that platelet reactivity testing has clinical and translational significance in predicting patients' risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Risk Factors and Establishment of a Risk Prediction Model for Severe Postpartum Haemorrhage. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Benzbromarone Combined with Sodium Bicarbonate Tablets in the Treatment of Hyperuricemia. Comparison of Effects between Nasal Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Frail Elderly. Application of Intelligent Management Model Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome During Immunotherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1