内窥镜颈椎后颅外侧倾斜椎板切开术:通过单侧双侧内窥镜脊柱手术对颈椎病根进行串联减压时保留脊柱侧膜的新方法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001722
Tsung-Mu Wu, Jin-Ho Hwang, Moon-Chan Kim, Dae-Jung Choi
{"title":"内窥镜颈椎后颅外侧倾斜椎板切开术:通过单侧双侧内窥镜脊柱手术对颈椎病根进行串联减压时保留脊柱侧膜的新方法。","authors":"Tsung-Mu Wu, Jin-Ho Hwang, Moon-Chan Kim, Dae-Jung Choi","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy gains attention for cervical radiculopathy due to its feasibility, better outcomes, and lower complications than traditional approaches, enabling efficient multilevel decompression in a single operation while avoiding anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion-related issues. However, with multilevel decompression, the remnant lamina becomes thin and fragile. We propose craniolateral inclinatory foraminotomy to minimize bone removal during laminotomy, reducing the risk of iatrogenic or postoperative lamina fractures in tandem decompression.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021 to 2022, 8 consecutive patients underwent the procedure and were followed up for at least 6 months. The VAS, NDI, and MacNab scores were recorded for clinical recovery and patient satisfaction evaluations. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were utilized to measure the lamina preservation percentage at each level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical outcomes improved significantly in every patient. No postoperative neck pain, segmental instability, or lamina fracture were observed. The mean lamina preservation percentages of C5, C6, C7, and all vertebrae were 68.8%, 73.22%, 71.86%, and 72.18%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ongoing technical adjustments will accompany endoscopic technique development to decrease complications and enhance benefits. Our reported technique avoids extensive laminotomy in multilevel tandem decompression, aiming to prevent lamina fractures and anticipate a reduction in postoperative neck pain.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Craniolateral Inclinatory Foraminotomy: A Novel Approach for Lamina Preservation During Tandem Decompression of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Via Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Mu Wu, Jin-Ho Hwang, Moon-Chan Kim, Dae-Jung Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy gains attention for cervical radiculopathy due to its feasibility, better outcomes, and lower complications than traditional approaches, enabling efficient multilevel decompression in a single operation while avoiding anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion-related issues. However, with multilevel decompression, the remnant lamina becomes thin and fragile. We propose craniolateral inclinatory foraminotomy to minimize bone removal during laminotomy, reducing the risk of iatrogenic or postoperative lamina fractures in tandem decompression.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021 to 2022, 8 consecutive patients underwent the procedure and were followed up for at least 6 months. The VAS, NDI, and MacNab scores were recorded for clinical recovery and patient satisfaction evaluations. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were utilized to measure the lamina preservation percentage at each level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical outcomes improved significantly in every patient. No postoperative neck pain, segmental instability, or lamina fracture were observed. The mean lamina preservation percentages of C5, C6, C7, and all vertebrae were 68.8%, 73.22%, 71.86%, and 72.18%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ongoing technical adjustments will accompany endoscopic technique development to decrease complications and enhance benefits. Our reported technique avoids extensive laminotomy in multilevel tandem decompression, aiming to prevent lamina fractures and anticipate a reduction in postoperative neck pain.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001722\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计病例系列:内窥镜颈椎后路椎板切除术因其可行性、更好的疗效以及比传统方法更低的并发症而备受颈椎病患者的关注,它可以在一次手术中实现有效的多椎间孔减压,同时避免颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术相关的问题。然而,多级减压术后,残余椎板变得薄而脆弱。我们建议采用颅外侧倾斜椎板切除术,以尽量减少椎板切除术中的骨质移除,降低串联减压术中先天性或术后椎板骨折的风险:从 2021 年到 2022 年,连续有 8 名患者接受了该手术,并接受了至少 6 个月的随访。记录 VAS、NDI 和 MacNab 评分,以评估临床恢复情况和患者满意度。术前和术后 CT 扫描用于测量各层次的骨板保留率:结果:每位患者的临床疗效都有明显改善。术后未发现颈部疼痛、节段不稳定或椎板骨折。C5、C6、C7和所有椎体的平均椎板保留率分别为68.8%、73.22%、71.86%和72.18%:随着内窥镜技术的发展,技术调整将不断进行,以减少并发症,提高效益。我们报告的技术在多层次串联减压术中避免了广泛的椎板切开术,旨在防止椎板骨折,并预计术后颈部疼痛会减轻:证据级别:IV级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Craniolateral Inclinatory Foraminotomy: A Novel Approach for Lamina Preservation During Tandem Decompression of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Via Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.

Study design: Case series.

Objective: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy gains attention for cervical radiculopathy due to its feasibility, better outcomes, and lower complications than traditional approaches, enabling efficient multilevel decompression in a single operation while avoiding anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion-related issues. However, with multilevel decompression, the remnant lamina becomes thin and fragile. We propose craniolateral inclinatory foraminotomy to minimize bone removal during laminotomy, reducing the risk of iatrogenic or postoperative lamina fractures in tandem decompression.

Materials and methods: From 2021 to 2022, 8 consecutive patients underwent the procedure and were followed up for at least 6 months. The VAS, NDI, and MacNab scores were recorded for clinical recovery and patient satisfaction evaluations. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were utilized to measure the lamina preservation percentage at each level.

Results: The clinical outcomes improved significantly in every patient. No postoperative neck pain, segmental instability, or lamina fracture were observed. The mean lamina preservation percentages of C5, C6, C7, and all vertebrae were 68.8%, 73.22%, 71.86%, and 72.18%, respectively.

Conclusions: Ongoing technical adjustments will accompany endoscopic technique development to decrease complications and enhance benefits. Our reported technique avoids extensive laminotomy in multilevel tandem decompression, aiming to prevent lamina fractures and anticipate a reduction in postoperative neck pain.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT as a Source of Patient Information for Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search. Restoration of Spinopelvic Alignment After Reduction of High-grade Spondylolisthesis: Myth or Reality? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis. Timelines for Return to Different Sports Types After Eight Cervical Spine Fractures in Recreational and Elite Athletes: A Survey of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research. Feasibility of Using Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Detecting Bone Layer of Cervical Spine Surgery. Lower Hounsfield Units at the Planned Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1