Gianluca Di Pietro, Riccardo Improta, Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Lucia Ilaria Birtolo, Ovidio De Filippo, Antonio Lattanzio, Raffaele De Cristofaro, Giacchino Galardo, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Roberto Badagliacca, Gennaro Sardella, Maurizio Volterrani, Francesco Fedele, Carmine Dario Vizza, Massimo Mancone
{"title":"急性心肌梗死患者在院内服用沙库比妥/缬沙坦:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Gianluca Di Pietro, Riccardo Improta, Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Lucia Ilaria Birtolo, Ovidio De Filippo, Antonio Lattanzio, Raffaele De Cristofaro, Giacchino Galardo, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Roberto Badagliacca, Gennaro Sardella, Maurizio Volterrani, Francesco Fedele, Carmine Dario Vizza, Massimo Mancone","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a need to address the evidence gap regarding the in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction patients. After searching MEDLINE, Google Scholars and Scopus, a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the in-hospital administration of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis) versus the standard therapy in patients with reduced heart failure due to myocardial infarction was performed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. All-cause mortality, cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and adverse events were the secondary endpoints. Nine studies (eight randomized controlled trials and one echo-substudy) with a total 6597 individuals (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: 3300 patients vs. ARNis: 3297 patients) were included for quantitative analysis. Median follow-up was 6 months. Patients receiving an in-hospital coadministration of ARNi had a lower risk of major cardiovascular event [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.63, P < 0.0001] and lower rate of repeat rehospitalization for heart failure (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.0001), compared with a standard regimen. Additionally, left ventricle volumes were significantly lower in the ARNi group [left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mean difference (MD) 11.48 mL, 95% CI 6.10-16.85, P < 0.0001; left ventricular end-systolic volume, MD 7.09 mL, 95% CI 2.89-11.29, P = 0.0009] with a significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.07, 95% CI 1.61-4.53, P < 0.0001), compared with standard therapy. No significant differences were observed in terms of cardiac death, all cause of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Higher rates of iatrogenic hypotensive events were observed in the ARNi group compared with the standard therapy (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26-1.60, P value < 0.00001). In patients with acute myocardial infarction related heart failure, the in-hospital administration of ARNis was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events and re-hospitalization for heart failure, as well as cardiac remodelling, but higher rates of hypotensive events compared with standard therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca Di Pietro, Riccardo Improta, Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Lucia Ilaria Birtolo, Ovidio De Filippo, Antonio Lattanzio, Raffaele De Cristofaro, Giacchino Galardo, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Roberto Badagliacca, Gennaro Sardella, Maurizio Volterrani, Francesco Fedele, Carmine Dario Vizza, Massimo Mancone\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a need to address the evidence gap regarding the in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction patients. After searching MEDLINE, Google Scholars and Scopus, a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the in-hospital administration of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis) versus the standard therapy in patients with reduced heart failure due to myocardial infarction was performed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. All-cause mortality, cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and adverse events were the secondary endpoints. Nine studies (eight randomized controlled trials and one echo-substudy) with a total 6597 individuals (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: 3300 patients vs. ARNis: 3297 patients) were included for quantitative analysis. Median follow-up was 6 months. Patients receiving an in-hospital coadministration of ARNi had a lower risk of major cardiovascular event [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.63, P < 0.0001] and lower rate of repeat rehospitalization for heart failure (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.0001), compared with a standard regimen. Additionally, left ventricle volumes were significantly lower in the ARNi group [left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mean difference (MD) 11.48 mL, 95% CI 6.10-16.85, P < 0.0001; left ventricular end-systolic volume, MD 7.09 mL, 95% CI 2.89-11.29, P = 0.0009] with a significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.07, 95% CI 1.61-4.53, P < 0.0001), compared with standard therapy. No significant differences were observed in terms of cardiac death, all cause of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Higher rates of iatrogenic hypotensive events were observed in the ARNi group compared with the standard therapy (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26-1.60, P value < 0.00001). In patients with acute myocardial infarction related heart failure, the in-hospital administration of ARNis was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events and re-hospitalization for heart failure, as well as cardiac remodelling, but higher rates of hypotensive events compared with standard therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.
There is a need to address the evidence gap regarding the in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction patients. After searching MEDLINE, Google Scholars and Scopus, a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the in-hospital administration of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis) versus the standard therapy in patients with reduced heart failure due to myocardial infarction was performed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. All-cause mortality, cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and adverse events were the secondary endpoints. Nine studies (eight randomized controlled trials and one echo-substudy) with a total 6597 individuals (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: 3300 patients vs. ARNis: 3297 patients) were included for quantitative analysis. Median follow-up was 6 months. Patients receiving an in-hospital coadministration of ARNi had a lower risk of major cardiovascular event [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.63, P < 0.0001] and lower rate of repeat rehospitalization for heart failure (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.0001), compared with a standard regimen. Additionally, left ventricle volumes were significantly lower in the ARNi group [left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mean difference (MD) 11.48 mL, 95% CI 6.10-16.85, P < 0.0001; left ventricular end-systolic volume, MD 7.09 mL, 95% CI 2.89-11.29, P = 0.0009] with a significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.07, 95% CI 1.61-4.53, P < 0.0001), compared with standard therapy. No significant differences were observed in terms of cardiac death, all cause of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Higher rates of iatrogenic hypotensive events were observed in the ARNi group compared with the standard therapy (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26-1.60, P value < 0.00001). In patients with acute myocardial infarction related heart failure, the in-hospital administration of ARNis was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events and re-hospitalization for heart failure, as well as cardiac remodelling, but higher rates of hypotensive events compared with standard therapy.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.