从胶质母细胞瘤患者血浆中提取的细胞外小泡的诊断潜力

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13752
Katja Döring, Vesna Malinova, Christoph Bettag, Veit Rohde, Matthias Schulz, Kerstin Menck, Annalen Bleckmann, Claudia Binder, Judith Büntzel
{"title":"从胶质母细胞瘤患者血浆中提取的细胞外小泡的诊断潜力","authors":"Katja Döring, Vesna Malinova, Christoph Bettag, Veit Rohde, Matthias Schulz, Kerstin Menck, Annalen Bleckmann, Claudia Binder, Judith Büntzel","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Biomarkers for patients suffering from glioblastoma (GBM) are scarce. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are a promising candidate for a potential biomarker. Therefore, EV concentration could be a potential biomarker of tumor burden, volume, and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Large EV (lEV) and small EV (sEV) were isolated from 36 GBM patients' blood plasma by differential centrifugation. Nanoparticle tracking was used to measure EV concentration. Quantitative analysis of tumor volume was performed by evaluating T2/FLAIR relaxation times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean size of lEV was 173.3 nm ± 18.2 nm, while sEV measured 148.3 ± 9.0 nm. Patients with higher lEV concentrations showed a trend towards longer overall survival (36.1 vs. 16.5 months, p=0.08). Regarding inflammatory markers, higher leukocyte count was positively correlated with higher sEV concentration (r<sup>2</sup>=0.3887, DF 21, p=0.0015). No significant relationship was found between lEV or sEV concentration and tumor volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall EV concentration in the peripheral blood is not a predictor of tumor volume. sEV concentration is associated with a potential pro-inflammatory metabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2735-2739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnostic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived From the Blood Plasma of Glioblastoma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Katja Döring, Vesna Malinova, Christoph Bettag, Veit Rohde, Matthias Schulz, Kerstin Menck, Annalen Bleckmann, Claudia Binder, Judith Büntzel\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Biomarkers for patients suffering from glioblastoma (GBM) are scarce. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are a promising candidate for a potential biomarker. Therefore, EV concentration could be a potential biomarker of tumor burden, volume, and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Large EV (lEV) and small EV (sEV) were isolated from 36 GBM patients' blood plasma by differential centrifugation. Nanoparticle tracking was used to measure EV concentration. Quantitative analysis of tumor volume was performed by evaluating T2/FLAIR relaxation times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean size of lEV was 173.3 nm ± 18.2 nm, while sEV measured 148.3 ± 9.0 nm. Patients with higher lEV concentrations showed a trend towards longer overall survival (36.1 vs. 16.5 months, p=0.08). Regarding inflammatory markers, higher leukocyte count was positively correlated with higher sEV concentration (r<sup>2</sup>=0.3887, DF 21, p=0.0015). No significant relationship was found between lEV or sEV concentration and tumor volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall EV concentration in the peripheral blood is not a predictor of tumor volume. sEV concentration is associated with a potential pro-inflammatory metabolism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"2735-2739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的生物标记物非常稀缺。细胞外囊泡(EV)是一种有希望成为潜在生物标志物的候选物质。因此,EV浓度可作为肿瘤负荷、体积和预后的潜在生物标志物:通过差速离心法从36名GBM患者的血浆中分离出大EV(lEV)和小EV(sEV)。采用纳米粒子追踪技术测量EV浓度。通过评估T2/FLAIR弛豫时间对肿瘤体积进行定量分析:结果:lEV的平均大小为173.3 nm ± 18.2 nm,而sEV的大小为148.3 ± 9.0 nm。lEV浓度越高的患者总生存期越长(36.1个月对16.5个月,P=0.08)。在炎症指标方面,较高的白细胞计数与较高的 sEV 浓度呈正相关(r2=0.3887,DF 21,p=0.0015)。lEV或sEV浓度与肿瘤体积无明显关系:结论:外周血中的总体 EV 浓度不能预测肿瘤体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Diagnostic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived From the Blood Plasma of Glioblastoma Patients.

Background/aim: Biomarkers for patients suffering from glioblastoma (GBM) are scarce. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are a promising candidate for a potential biomarker. Therefore, EV concentration could be a potential biomarker of tumor burden, volume, and prognosis.

Patients and methods: Large EV (lEV) and small EV (sEV) were isolated from 36 GBM patients' blood plasma by differential centrifugation. Nanoparticle tracking was used to measure EV concentration. Quantitative analysis of tumor volume was performed by evaluating T2/FLAIR relaxation times.

Results: The mean size of lEV was 173.3 nm ± 18.2 nm, while sEV measured 148.3 ± 9.0 nm. Patients with higher lEV concentrations showed a trend towards longer overall survival (36.1 vs. 16.5 months, p=0.08). Regarding inflammatory markers, higher leukocyte count was positively correlated with higher sEV concentration (r2=0.3887, DF 21, p=0.0015). No significant relationship was found between lEV or sEV concentration and tumor volume.

Conclusion: Overall EV concentration in the peripheral blood is not a predictor of tumor volume. sEV concentration is associated with a potential pro-inflammatory metabolism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-based Cytological Features of Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified, Extrauterine Adenocarcinoma, and Other Malignant Neoplasms of The Uterine Cervix: A 5-year Single-institutional Experience With 30 Consecutive Patients. Long-term Effect of the HCV Elimination With Direct-acting Antivirals on the Progression of Gastroesophageal Varices. Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders. Malignant Triton Tumor of the Distal Femur: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Management of Recurrent Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia With Oritavancin: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1