{"title":"下直肠吻合术中通过 ICG 和 SST 多方面预防吻合口渗漏的效果","authors":"Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Keisuke Goto, Sotaro Iwauchi, Takehiro Kobayashi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In rectal cancer surgery, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most important complication and has a reported frequency of 11-15%. The causes of AL leakage are complex, and AL prevention should be performed in multiple directions. Thus, this study examined the usefulness of the comprehensive and multifaceted AL preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In total, 164 rectal surgery patients who had low rectal staple anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: (i) the multifaceted AL prevention group (MP group, n=34) and (ii) the insufficient AL prevention group (IP group, n=130). Multifaceted AL prevention was defined as intestinal blood flow evaluated via indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence imaging (FI), the use of a single-staple technique (SST) without intersecting stapling lines or \"dog ears\", the use of transanal suture reinforcement according to the air leakage test, and the use of a transanal tube for anatomical decompression and a diverting stoma for diverting the fecal stream. The AL rates were retrospectively compared between the two groups. The data are expressed as the median and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of AL was significantly lower in the MP group (0%) than in the IP group (11.54%) (p=0.0423).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multifaceted AL prevention, including ICG-FI and SST, achieved a zero incidence of AL. Multifaceted prevention significantly lessened AL more than inadequate prevention did. Therefore, if the weight of each preventive measure cannot be clearly identified, to avoid AL, it is important to take all preventive measures from multiple aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2973-2980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Multifaceted Anastomotic Leakage Prevention <i>via</i> ICG and SST for Lower Rectal Anastomosis.\",\"authors\":\"Shunjin Ryu, Yuta Imaizumi, Keisuke Goto, Sotaro Iwauchi, Takehiro Kobayashi, Ryusuke Ito, Yukio Nakabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In rectal cancer surgery, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most important complication and has a reported frequency of 11-15%. The causes of AL leakage are complex, and AL prevention should be performed in multiple directions. Thus, this study examined the usefulness of the comprehensive and multifaceted AL preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In total, 164 rectal surgery patients who had low rectal staple anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: (i) the multifaceted AL prevention group (MP group, n=34) and (ii) the insufficient AL prevention group (IP group, n=130). Multifaceted AL prevention was defined as intestinal blood flow evaluated via indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence imaging (FI), the use of a single-staple technique (SST) without intersecting stapling lines or \\\"dog ears\\\", the use of transanal suture reinforcement according to the air leakage test, and the use of a transanal tube for anatomical decompression and a diverting stoma for diverting the fecal stream. The AL rates were retrospectively compared between the two groups. The data are expressed as the median and interquartile range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of AL was significantly lower in the MP group (0%) than in the IP group (11.54%) (p=0.0423).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multifaceted AL prevention, including ICG-FI and SST, achieved a zero incidence of AL. Multifaceted prevention significantly lessened AL more than inadequate prevention did. Therefore, if the weight of each preventive measure cannot be clearly identified, to avoid AL, it is important to take all preventive measures from multiple aspects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"2973-2980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:在直肠癌手术中,吻合口漏(AL)是最重要的并发症,据报道发生率为 11-15%。造成 AL 渗漏的原因很复杂,因此应从多个方面预防 AL 的发生。因此,本研究探讨了全方位、多角度的 AL 预防措施的实用性:共纳入 164 名在腹膜反射下方进行低位直肠钉吻合术的直肠手术患者。患者被分为两组:(i) 多方面AL预防组(MP组,n=34)和(ii) AL预防不足组(IP组,n=130)。多方位 AL 预防的定义是:通过吲哚青绿(ICG)荧光成像(FI)评估肠道血流、使用无交叉缝合线或 "狗耳朵 "的单缝技术(SST)、根据漏气试验使用经肛门缝合加固、使用经肛门管道进行解剖减压和使用分流造口进行粪流分流。回顾性比较了两组患者的 AL 率。数据以中位数和四分位间范围表示:结果:MP 组的 AL 发生率(0%)明显低于 IP 组(11.54%)(P=0.0423):结论:包括 ICG-FI 和 SST 在内的多方位 AL 预防可实现零 AL 发生率。结论:包括 ICG-FI 和 SST 在内的多方面 AL 预防可实现零发病率。因此,如果不能明确每项预防措施的权重,要避免 AL,就必须从多方面采取所有预防措施。
The Effect of Multifaceted Anastomotic Leakage Prevention via ICG and SST for Lower Rectal Anastomosis.
Background/aim: In rectal cancer surgery, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most important complication and has a reported frequency of 11-15%. The causes of AL leakage are complex, and AL prevention should be performed in multiple directions. Thus, this study examined the usefulness of the comprehensive and multifaceted AL preventive measures.
Patients and methods: In total, 164 rectal surgery patients who had low rectal staple anastomosis below the peritoneal reflection were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: (i) the multifaceted AL prevention group (MP group, n=34) and (ii) the insufficient AL prevention group (IP group, n=130). Multifaceted AL prevention was defined as intestinal blood flow evaluated via indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence imaging (FI), the use of a single-staple technique (SST) without intersecting stapling lines or "dog ears", the use of transanal suture reinforcement according to the air leakage test, and the use of a transanal tube for anatomical decompression and a diverting stoma for diverting the fecal stream. The AL rates were retrospectively compared between the two groups. The data are expressed as the median and interquartile range.
Results: The rate of AL was significantly lower in the MP group (0%) than in the IP group (11.54%) (p=0.0423).
Conclusion: Multifaceted AL prevention, including ICG-FI and SST, achieved a zero incidence of AL. Multifaceted prevention significantly lessened AL more than inadequate prevention did. Therefore, if the weight of each preventive measure cannot be clearly identified, to avoid AL, it is important to take all preventive measures from multiple aspects.
期刊介绍:
IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management.
The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.