{"title":"比较胸腔镜手术和传统开放手术治疗新生儿先天性膈疝的有效性和安全性:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Saurabh Srivastav, Shrikesh Singh, Tanvir Roshan Khan","doi":"10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_24_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic surgery is an increasingly popular surgical technique for the repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety of thoracoscopic surgery and the conventional open surgical approach for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Google, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies comparing thoracoscopic surgery and open surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A total of 6 studies with 3348 patients were found. Parameters such as operation time, hospital stay, recurrence rate, postoperative mortality, and postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3348 children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia included in the 6 studies, 615 underwent thoracoscopic surgery and 2733 underwent open surgery. All studies were nonrandomized controlled trials. The operation times were shorter for thoracoscopic surgery than for open surgery in three studies, but there was no significant difference (standard mean difference = 1.25, confidence interval [CI] = [-0.48-2.98], <i>P</i> = 0.16). In the thoracoscopic surgery group, the rate of postoperative deaths was significantly lower (95% CI = 1.24-2.75), but the occurrence of recurrences was more frequent (95% CI = 0.08-0.23). The hospital stay varied significantly across studies. There was a statistically significant difference (standard mean difference = -1.47, CI = [-2.24--0.70], <i>P</i> < 0.001) in the overall effect between the groups. The complication rate was significantly lower with thoracoscopic surgery compared to open surgery (odds ratio = 0.26, CI = [0.10-0.66], <i>P</i> = 0.004) for the overall effect between the groups. The thoracoscopic procedure, however, was planned for milder and stable cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, fewer complications, and less postoperative mortality than traditional open repair. However, the rate of recurrence was found to be higher in those who underwent thoracoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons","volume":"29 5","pages":"511-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Saurabh Srivastav, Shrikesh Singh, Tanvir Roshan Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_24_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic surgery is an increasingly popular surgical technique for the repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety of thoracoscopic surgery and the conventional open surgical approach for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Google, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies comparing thoracoscopic surgery and open surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A total of 6 studies with 3348 patients were found. Parameters such as operation time, hospital stay, recurrence rate, postoperative mortality, and postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3348 children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia included in the 6 studies, 615 underwent thoracoscopic surgery and 2733 underwent open surgery. All studies were nonrandomized controlled trials. The operation times were shorter for thoracoscopic surgery than for open surgery in three studies, but there was no significant difference (standard mean difference = 1.25, confidence interval [CI] = [-0.48-2.98], <i>P</i> = 0.16). In the thoracoscopic surgery group, the rate of postoperative deaths was significantly lower (95% CI = 1.24-2.75), but the occurrence of recurrences was more frequent (95% CI = 0.08-0.23). The hospital stay varied significantly across studies. There was a statistically significant difference (standard mean difference = -1.47, CI = [-2.24--0.70], <i>P</i> < 0.001) in the overall effect between the groups. The complication rate was significantly lower with thoracoscopic surgery compared to open surgery (odds ratio = 0.26, CI = [0.10-0.66], <i>P</i> = 0.004) for the overall effect between the groups. The thoracoscopic procedure, however, was planned for milder and stable cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, fewer complications, and less postoperative mortality than traditional open repair. However, the rate of recurrence was found to be higher in those who underwent thoracoscopic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"511-516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521227/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_24_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_24_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胸腔镜手术是一种越来越流行的修复先天性膈疝的手术技术。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较胸腔镜手术和传统开放手术方法治疗新生儿先天性膈疝的有效性和安全性:对PubMed、Google和Web of Science等电子数据库进行了系统检索,以确定比较胸腔镜手术和开放手术治疗先天性膈疝的研究。共找到 6 项研究,3348 名患者。通过荟萃分析对手术时间、住院时间、复发率、术后死亡率和术后并发症等参数进行了汇总和比较:结果:6项研究共纳入了3348名先天性膈疝患儿,其中615名患儿接受了胸腔镜手术,2733名患儿接受了开腹手术。所有研究均为非随机对照试验。在三项研究中,胸腔镜手术的手术时间短于开放手术,但没有显著差异(标准平均差异 = 1.25,置信区间 [CI] = [-0.48-2.98],P = 0.16)。胸腔镜手术组的术后死亡率明显较低(95% CI = 1.24-2.75),但复发率较高(95% CI = 0.08-0.23)。不同研究的住院时间差异很大。各组间的总体效果存在显著统计学差异(标准平均差 = -1.47, CI = [-2.24--0.70],P <0.001)。胸腔镜手术的并发症发生率明显低于开放手术(几率比=0.26,CI=[0.10-0.66],P=0.004)。不过,胸腔镜手术适用于病情较轻且稳定的病例:结论:与传统的开放式修补术相比,胸腔镜修补新生儿先天性膈疝的住院时间更短、并发症更少、术后死亡率更低。然而,接受胸腔镜手术的新生儿复发率较高。
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates: A Meta-analysis.
Background: Thoracoscopic surgery is an increasingly popular surgical technique for the repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety of thoracoscopic surgery and the conventional open surgical approach for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates.
Materials and methods: A systematic search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Google, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies comparing thoracoscopic surgery and open surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. A total of 6 studies with 3348 patients were found. Parameters such as operation time, hospital stay, recurrence rate, postoperative mortality, and postoperative complications were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.
Results: Of the 3348 children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia included in the 6 studies, 615 underwent thoracoscopic surgery and 2733 underwent open surgery. All studies were nonrandomized controlled trials. The operation times were shorter for thoracoscopic surgery than for open surgery in three studies, but there was no significant difference (standard mean difference = 1.25, confidence interval [CI] = [-0.48-2.98], P = 0.16). In the thoracoscopic surgery group, the rate of postoperative deaths was significantly lower (95% CI = 1.24-2.75), but the occurrence of recurrences was more frequent (95% CI = 0.08-0.23). The hospital stay varied significantly across studies. There was a statistically significant difference (standard mean difference = -1.47, CI = [-2.24--0.70], P < 0.001) in the overall effect between the groups. The complication rate was significantly lower with thoracoscopic surgery compared to open surgery (odds ratio = 0.26, CI = [0.10-0.66], P = 0.004) for the overall effect between the groups. The thoracoscopic procedure, however, was planned for milder and stable cases.
Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, fewer complications, and less postoperative mortality than traditional open repair. However, the rate of recurrence was found to be higher in those who underwent thoracoscopic surgery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons is the official organ of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The journal started its journey in October 1995 under the Editor-in-Chief Prof. Subir K Chatterjee. An advisory board was formed with well-versed internationally reputed senior members of our society like Late Prof. R K Gandhi, Prof. I C Pathak, Prof. P Upadhyay, Prof. T Dorairajan and many more. since then the journal is published quarterly uninterrupted. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, review articles and technical innovations. Special issues on different subjects are published every year. There have been several contributions from overseas experts.