Sherry L Haller, Chorong Park, Ryan C Bruneau, Dewi Megawati, Chi Zhang, Sameera Vipat, Chen Peng, Tatiana G Senkevich, Greg Brennan, Loubna Tazi, Stefan Rothenburg
{"title":"痘病毒 PKR 抑制剂 E3 和 K3 的宿主物种特异性活性介导宿主范围功能。","authors":"Sherry L Haller, Chorong Park, Ryan C Bruneau, Dewi Megawati, Chi Zhang, Sameera Vipat, Chen Peng, Tatiana G Senkevich, Greg Brennan, Loubna Tazi, Stefan Rothenburg","doi":"10.1128/jvi.01331-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) is activated by viral double-stranded RNA and phosphorylates translation initiation factor eIF2α, thereby inhibiting translation and virus replication. Most poxviruses contain two PKR inhibitors, called E3 and K3 in vaccinia virus (VACV), which are determinants of viral host range. The prevailing model for E3 function is that it inhibits PKR through the non-specific sequestration of double-stranded (ds) RNA. Our data revealed that Syrian hamster PKR was resistant to E3, which is at odds with the sequestration model. However, Syrian hamster PKR was still sensitive to K3 inhibition. In contrast, Armenian hamster PKR showed opposite sensitivities, being sensitive to E3 and resistant to K3 inhibition. Mutational analyses of hamster PKRs showed that sensitivity to E3 inhibition was largely determined by the region linking the dsRNA-binding domains and the kinase domain of PKR, whereas two amino acid residues in the kinase domain (helix αG) determined sensitivity to K3. The expression of PKRs in congenic cells showed that Syrian hamster PKR containing the two Armenian hamster PKR residues in helix αG was resistant to wild-type VACV infection and that cells expressing either hamster PKR recapitulated the phenotypes observed in species-derived cell lines. The observed resistance of Syrian hamster PKR to E3 explains its host range function and challenges the paradigm that dsRNA-binding PKR inhibitors mainly act by the sequestration of dsRNA.IMPORTANCEThe molecular mechanisms that govern the host range of viruses are incompletely understood. We show that the host range functions of E3 and K3, two host range factors from vaccinia virus, are a result of species-specific interactions with the antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) and that PKR from closely related species displayed dramatic differences in their sensitivities to these viral inhibitors. The current model for E3-mediated PKR inhibition is that E3 non-specifically sequesters double-stranded (ds) RNA to prevent PKR activation. This model does not predict species-specific sensitivity to E3; therefore, our data suggest that the current model is incomplete and that dsRNA sequestration is not the primary mechanism for E3 activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Virology","volume":" ","pages":"e0133124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Host species-specific activity of the poxvirus PKR inhibitors E3 and K3 mediate host range function.\",\"authors\":\"Sherry L Haller, Chorong Park, Ryan C Bruneau, Dewi Megawati, Chi Zhang, Sameera Vipat, Chen Peng, Tatiana G Senkevich, Greg Brennan, Loubna Tazi, Stefan Rothenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jvi.01331-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) is activated by viral double-stranded RNA and phosphorylates translation initiation factor eIF2α, thereby inhibiting translation and virus replication. Most poxviruses contain two PKR inhibitors, called E3 and K3 in vaccinia virus (VACV), which are determinants of viral host range. The prevailing model for E3 function is that it inhibits PKR through the non-specific sequestration of double-stranded (ds) RNA. Our data revealed that Syrian hamster PKR was resistant to E3, which is at odds with the sequestration model. However, Syrian hamster PKR was still sensitive to K3 inhibition. In contrast, Armenian hamster PKR showed opposite sensitivities, being sensitive to E3 and resistant to K3 inhibition. Mutational analyses of hamster PKRs showed that sensitivity to E3 inhibition was largely determined by the region linking the dsRNA-binding domains and the kinase domain of PKR, whereas two amino acid residues in the kinase domain (helix αG) determined sensitivity to K3. The expression of PKRs in congenic cells showed that Syrian hamster PKR containing the two Armenian hamster PKR residues in helix αG was resistant to wild-type VACV infection and that cells expressing either hamster PKR recapitulated the phenotypes observed in species-derived cell lines. The observed resistance of Syrian hamster PKR to E3 explains its host range function and challenges the paradigm that dsRNA-binding PKR inhibitors mainly act by the sequestration of dsRNA.IMPORTANCEThe molecular mechanisms that govern the host range of viruses are incompletely understood. We show that the host range functions of E3 and K3, two host range factors from vaccinia virus, are a result of species-specific interactions with the antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) and that PKR from closely related species displayed dramatic differences in their sensitivities to these viral inhibitors. The current model for E3-mediated PKR inhibition is that E3 non-specifically sequesters double-stranded (ds) RNA to prevent PKR activation. This model does not predict species-specific sensitivity to E3; therefore, our data suggest that the current model is incomplete and that dsRNA sequestration is not the primary mechanism for E3 activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0133124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01331-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01331-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抗病毒蛋白激酶 R(PKR)被病毒双链 RNA 激活,使翻译起始因子 eIF2α 磷酸化,从而抑制翻译和病毒复制。大多数痘病毒都含有两种 PKR 抑制剂,在疫苗病毒(VACV)中称为 E3 和 K3,它们是病毒宿主范围的决定因素。E3 功能的普遍模式是,它通过非特异性地封闭双链(ds)RNA 来抑制 PKR。我们的数据显示,叙利亚仓鼠 PKR 对 E3 具有抗性,这与螯合模型不符。然而,叙利亚仓鼠 PKR 对 K3 抑制仍然敏感。相比之下,亚美尼亚仓鼠PKR则表现出相反的敏感性,对E3敏感,对K3抑制耐受。仓鼠PKR的突变分析表明,对E3抑制的敏感性主要由连接dsRNA结合域和PKR激酶域的区域决定,而激酶域(螺旋αG)中的两个氨基酸残基决定了对K3的敏感性。在同种异源细胞中表达 PKRs 的结果表明,在螺旋 αG 中含有两个亚美尼亚仓鼠 PKR 残基的叙利亚仓鼠 PKR 对野生型 VACV 感染具有抗性,而且表达任一仓鼠 PKR 的细胞都重现了在同种异源细胞系中观察到的表型。观察到的叙利亚仓鼠 PKR 对 E3 的抗性解释了其宿主范围功能,并对 dsRNA 结合型 PKR 抑制剂主要通过封闭 dsRNA 起作用的范式提出了质疑。我们的研究表明,E3 和 K3(疫苗病毒的两种宿主范围因子)的宿主范围功能是物种特异性与抗病毒蛋白激酶 R(PKR)相互作用的结果,而且近缘物种的 PKR 对这些病毒抑制剂的敏感性存在巨大差异。目前关于 E3 介导的 PKR 抑制的模型是,E3 非特异性地封存双链(ds)RNA,以防止 PKR 激活。这一模型并不能预测物种对 E3 的特异性敏感性;因此,我们的数据表明,目前的模型并不完整,dsRNA 封存并不是 E3 活性的主要机制。
Host species-specific activity of the poxvirus PKR inhibitors E3 and K3 mediate host range function.
The antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) is activated by viral double-stranded RNA and phosphorylates translation initiation factor eIF2α, thereby inhibiting translation and virus replication. Most poxviruses contain two PKR inhibitors, called E3 and K3 in vaccinia virus (VACV), which are determinants of viral host range. The prevailing model for E3 function is that it inhibits PKR through the non-specific sequestration of double-stranded (ds) RNA. Our data revealed that Syrian hamster PKR was resistant to E3, which is at odds with the sequestration model. However, Syrian hamster PKR was still sensitive to K3 inhibition. In contrast, Armenian hamster PKR showed opposite sensitivities, being sensitive to E3 and resistant to K3 inhibition. Mutational analyses of hamster PKRs showed that sensitivity to E3 inhibition was largely determined by the region linking the dsRNA-binding domains and the kinase domain of PKR, whereas two amino acid residues in the kinase domain (helix αG) determined sensitivity to K3. The expression of PKRs in congenic cells showed that Syrian hamster PKR containing the two Armenian hamster PKR residues in helix αG was resistant to wild-type VACV infection and that cells expressing either hamster PKR recapitulated the phenotypes observed in species-derived cell lines. The observed resistance of Syrian hamster PKR to E3 explains its host range function and challenges the paradigm that dsRNA-binding PKR inhibitors mainly act by the sequestration of dsRNA.IMPORTANCEThe molecular mechanisms that govern the host range of viruses are incompletely understood. We show that the host range functions of E3 and K3, two host range factors from vaccinia virus, are a result of species-specific interactions with the antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) and that PKR from closely related species displayed dramatic differences in their sensitivities to these viral inhibitors. The current model for E3-mediated PKR inhibition is that E3 non-specifically sequesters double-stranded (ds) RNA to prevent PKR activation. This model does not predict species-specific sensitivity to E3; therefore, our data suggest that the current model is incomplete and that dsRNA sequestration is not the primary mechanism for E3 activity.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Virology (JVI) explores the nature of the viruses of animals, archaea, bacteria, fungi, plants, and protozoa. We welcome papers on virion structure and assembly, viral genome replication and regulation of gene expression, genetic diversity and evolution, virus-cell interactions, cellular responses to infection, transformation and oncogenesis, gene delivery, viral pathogenesis and immunity, and vaccines and antiviral agents.