全髋关节置换术患者步态过程中地面反作用力和冲量的动力学分析初步研究及对康复的启示

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/os.14276
Yuting Zhao, Wasim Raza, Graham Arnold, Penghai Li, Weijie Wang
{"title":"全髋关节置换术患者步态过程中地面反作用力和冲量的动力学分析初步研究及对康复的启示","authors":"Yuting Zhao, Wasim Raza, Graham Arnold, Penghai Li, Weijie Wang","doi":"10.1111/os.14276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little research done on ground reaction forces (GRF) in terms of 3D impulses after total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to investigate the GRFs and 3D impulses in four sub-phases of stance during gait in the patients undergoing THR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 10 pain-free THR patients and 10 healthy people were recruited. This is an observational and retrospective study. The gait data was collected between 2008 and 2014 and analyzed between 2020 and 2024. All the participants were included in the three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait parameters, phase durations, GRFs and impulses' key values during gait were calculated in four sub-phases of stance. Statistical comparisons were performed with generalized linear models including age, gender, body mass index and walking speed as interactive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is found that (1) cadence, walking speed, stride length and step width in THR group were significantly decreased in compared with control group; (2) the THR decreased loading response duration in operative side and pre-swing duration in non-operative side compared with the control group, but the THR's two sides have similar duration proportions in sub-stance phases; (3) the THR group had lower GRFs than the control group in vertical direction but higher in the medial-lateral direction; (4) in operative side, the THR's impulses in loading response phase were lower than the control group in anterior-posterior direction, and (5) in non-operative side, the THR's impulse in pre-swing phase in anterior-posterior direction was higher than the control side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The THR group showed slower walking speeds than the control group. The reasons could be from the decreased impulse in loading response phase, the decreased 2nd peak of GRF and the decreased pre-swing impulse in vertical direction in operative side. Clinicians are suggested to consider the information provided when designing relevant rehabilitation exercises on the related muscles and functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Study on Kinetic Analysis of Ground Reaction Force and Impulse During Gait in Patients With Total Hip Replacement and Implication for Rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Yuting Zhao, Wasim Raza, Graham Arnold, Penghai Li, Weijie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little research done on ground reaction forces (GRF) in terms of 3D impulses after total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to investigate the GRFs and 3D impulses in four sub-phases of stance during gait in the patients undergoing THR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 10 pain-free THR patients and 10 healthy people were recruited. This is an observational and retrospective study. The gait data was collected between 2008 and 2014 and analyzed between 2020 and 2024. All the participants were included in the three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait parameters, phase durations, GRFs and impulses' key values during gait were calculated in four sub-phases of stance. Statistical comparisons were performed with generalized linear models including age, gender, body mass index and walking speed as interactive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is found that (1) cadence, walking speed, stride length and step width in THR group were significantly decreased in compared with control group; (2) the THR decreased loading response duration in operative side and pre-swing duration in non-operative side compared with the control group, but the THR's two sides have similar duration proportions in sub-stance phases; (3) the THR group had lower GRFs than the control group in vertical direction but higher in the medial-lateral direction; (4) in operative side, the THR's impulses in loading response phase were lower than the control group in anterior-posterior direction, and (5) in non-operative side, the THR's impulse in pre-swing phase in anterior-posterior direction was higher than the control side.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The THR group showed slower walking speeds than the control group. The reasons could be from the decreased impulse in loading response phase, the decreased 2nd peak of GRF and the decreased pre-swing impulse in vertical direction in operative side. Clinicians are suggested to consider the information provided when designing relevant rehabilitation exercises on the related muscles and functions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关全髋关节置换术(THR)后地面反作用力(GRF)三维脉冲的研究很少。本研究旨在调查接受全髋关节置换术的患者在步态的四个子阶段中的地面反作用力和三维脉冲:方法:共招募了 10 名无疼痛的 THR 患者和 10 名健康人。这是一项观察性和回顾性研究。步态数据收集时间为 2008 年至 2014 年,分析时间为 2020 年至 2024 年。所有参与者都纳入了三维步态分析。在步态的四个子阶段计算步态参数、阶段持续时间、GRF 和脉冲的关键值。统计比较采用广义线性模型,将年龄、性别、体重指数和步行速度作为交互因素:结果发现:(1) 与对照组相比,THR 组的步频、行走速度、步长和步幅明显减少;(2) 与对照组相比,THR 减少了手术侧的加载反应持续时间和非手术侧的挥臂前持续时间,但THR 的两侧在亚步态阶段的持续时间比例相似;(3) THR 组在垂直方向的 GRF 值低于对照组,但在内侧-外侧方向的 GRF 值高于对照组;(4) 在手术侧,THR 在加载响应阶段前后方向的冲量低于对照组;(5) 在非手术侧,THR 在挥杆前阶段前后方向的冲量高于对照组。结论THR 组的行走速度低于对照组。原因可能是手术侧加载反应阶段的冲量减少、GRF 第二峰值减少以及挥臂前垂直方向的冲量减少。建议临床医生在设计相关肌肉和功能的康复训练时考虑这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Preliminary Study on Kinetic Analysis of Ground Reaction Force and Impulse During Gait in Patients With Total Hip Replacement and Implication for Rehabilitation.

Background: There is little research done on ground reaction forces (GRF) in terms of 3D impulses after total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to investigate the GRFs and 3D impulses in four sub-phases of stance during gait in the patients undergoing THR.

Methods: A total of 10 pain-free THR patients and 10 healthy people were recruited. This is an observational and retrospective study. The gait data was collected between 2008 and 2014 and analyzed between 2020 and 2024. All the participants were included in the three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait parameters, phase durations, GRFs and impulses' key values during gait were calculated in four sub-phases of stance. Statistical comparisons were performed with generalized linear models including age, gender, body mass index and walking speed as interactive factors.

Results: It is found that (1) cadence, walking speed, stride length and step width in THR group were significantly decreased in compared with control group; (2) the THR decreased loading response duration in operative side and pre-swing duration in non-operative side compared with the control group, but the THR's two sides have similar duration proportions in sub-stance phases; (3) the THR group had lower GRFs than the control group in vertical direction but higher in the medial-lateral direction; (4) in operative side, the THR's impulses in loading response phase were lower than the control group in anterior-posterior direction, and (5) in non-operative side, the THR's impulse in pre-swing phase in anterior-posterior direction was higher than the control side.

Conclusion: The THR group showed slower walking speeds than the control group. The reasons could be from the decreased impulse in loading response phase, the decreased 2nd peak of GRF and the decreased pre-swing impulse in vertical direction in operative side. Clinicians are suggested to consider the information provided when designing relevant rehabilitation exercises on the related muscles and functions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Consultations and Their Effect on Surgical Delays and Mortality in Hip Fracture Surgery. Arthroscopic Management of Juxta-Articular Proximal Tibial Chondroblastoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. HyProCure for Flatfoot Deformity: A Clinical Characteristics Analysis in China. Incidence and Risk Factors of Infection After Fracture Fixation: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Novel MRI Signs in Atlantodental Space Predict Reduction Degree of Atlantoaxial Dislocation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1