{"title":"老花定向运动员使用的视力矫正器。","authors":"Keziah Latham, Louis P H Abbott, Matthew A Timmis","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Evaluating the visual challenges and refractive correction solutions of presbyopic orienteers identifies features of relevance to optometric management of the visual needs of active presbyopes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Orienteering is a unique sport requiring visual clarity at a range of viewing distances and has a high proportion of presbyopic participants. This study evaluates the vision corrections used by presbyopic orienteers, specifically aiming to characterize the prevalence of different vision correction options used and to explore the strengths and limitations of different vision correction solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orienteers 40 years or older completed an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions covering personal demographics, orienteering participation, and visual corrections worn in everyday life and for orienteering. Free-text questions asked for further information about the corrections used and advice received from eye care practitioners were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 469 respondents (195 women, 274 men; median age category, 55 to 59 years). For the 187 people without distance refractive correction, the most frequent corrections for orienteering were \"off the shelf\" reading spectacles (n = 95) or use of a compass magnifier (n = 24), and for the 277 people with distance refractive correction, they were progressive addition spectacles (n = 96) and monovision contact lenses (n = 63). The main visual challenges faced by orienteers were seeing map detail, lens obstruction from fogging and rain, and difficulty orienteering in low light in the daytime. An ideal correction needed to provide visual clarity for both map and terrain. No visual correction type consistently addressed all challenges. Orienteers valued personalized discussion with eye care practitioners to address their needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimal visual corrections for presbyopic orienteers are individual, but higher reading additions to clarify map detail, contact lenses to avoid lens obstruction, additional light, and solutions that provide clear vision at all viewing distances while avoiding the reading add blurring the ground at the orienteer's feet should be considered. Personalized care is necessary to optimize visual correction solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vision corrections used by presbyopic orienteers.\",\"authors\":\"Keziah Latham, Louis P H Abbott, Matthew A Timmis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Evaluating the visual challenges and refractive correction solutions of presbyopic orienteers identifies features of relevance to optometric management of the visual needs of active presbyopes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Orienteering is a unique sport requiring visual clarity at a range of viewing distances and has a high proportion of presbyopic participants. This study evaluates the vision corrections used by presbyopic orienteers, specifically aiming to characterize the prevalence of different vision correction options used and to explore the strengths and limitations of different vision correction solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orienteers 40 years or older completed an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions covering personal demographics, orienteering participation, and visual corrections worn in everyday life and for orienteering. Free-text questions asked for further information about the corrections used and advice received from eye care practitioners were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 469 respondents (195 women, 274 men; median age category, 55 to 59 years). For the 187 people without distance refractive correction, the most frequent corrections for orienteering were \\\"off the shelf\\\" reading spectacles (n = 95) or use of a compass magnifier (n = 24), and for the 277 people with distance refractive correction, they were progressive addition spectacles (n = 96) and monovision contact lenses (n = 63). The main visual challenges faced by orienteers were seeing map detail, lens obstruction from fogging and rain, and difficulty orienteering in low light in the daytime. An ideal correction needed to provide visual clarity for both map and terrain. No visual correction type consistently addressed all challenges. Orienteers valued personalized discussion with eye care practitioners to address their needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimal visual corrections for presbyopic orienteers are individual, but higher reading additions to clarify map detail, contact lenses to avoid lens obstruction, additional light, and solutions that provide clear vision at all viewing distances while avoiding the reading add blurring the ground at the orienteer's feet should be considered. Personalized care is necessary to optimize visual correction solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Significance: Evaluating the visual challenges and refractive correction solutions of presbyopic orienteers identifies features of relevance to optometric management of the visual needs of active presbyopes.
Purpose: Orienteering is a unique sport requiring visual clarity at a range of viewing distances and has a high proportion of presbyopic participants. This study evaluates the vision corrections used by presbyopic orienteers, specifically aiming to characterize the prevalence of different vision correction options used and to explore the strengths and limitations of different vision correction solutions.
Methods: Orienteers 40 years or older completed an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions covering personal demographics, orienteering participation, and visual corrections worn in everyday life and for orienteering. Free-text questions asked for further information about the corrections used and advice received from eye care practitioners were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: There were 469 respondents (195 women, 274 men; median age category, 55 to 59 years). For the 187 people without distance refractive correction, the most frequent corrections for orienteering were "off the shelf" reading spectacles (n = 95) or use of a compass magnifier (n = 24), and for the 277 people with distance refractive correction, they were progressive addition spectacles (n = 96) and monovision contact lenses (n = 63). The main visual challenges faced by orienteers were seeing map detail, lens obstruction from fogging and rain, and difficulty orienteering in low light in the daytime. An ideal correction needed to provide visual clarity for both map and terrain. No visual correction type consistently addressed all challenges. Orienteers valued personalized discussion with eye care practitioners to address their needs.
Conclusions: Optimal visual corrections for presbyopic orienteers are individual, but higher reading additions to clarify map detail, contact lenses to avoid lens obstruction, additional light, and solutions that provide clear vision at all viewing distances while avoiding the reading add blurring the ground at the orienteer's feet should be considered. Personalized care is necessary to optimize visual correction solutions.
期刊介绍:
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.