T.新鲜野生菌株的 Muris 感染动力学:已确定的 E 隔离株是否仍然适用?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Parasite Immunology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1111/pim.13072
Iris Mair, Alexander R Bennett, Ruth Forman, Abdulrazzag A Othman, Larisa Logunova, Hannah Smith, Ann E Lowe, Janette E Bradley, David J Thornton, Kathryn J Else
{"title":"T.新鲜野生菌株的 Muris 感染动力学:已确定的 E 隔离株是否仍然适用?","authors":"Iris Mair, Alexander R Bennett, Ruth Forman, Abdulrazzag A Othman, Larisa Logunova, Hannah Smith, Ann E Lowe, Janette E Bradley, David J Thornton, Kathryn J Else","doi":"10.1111/pim.13072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For decades, parasitic worms such as Trichuris muris have been maintained in laboratory animals, providing insights into host-parasite interactions and host immune responses. The most used T. muris isolate is the E isolate, established in the laboratory in 1954. However, one concern with these model systems is the potential for laboratory-induced selection and therefore changes in host-parasite interactions. To address these concerns, we compare the E isolate with a recently isolated T. muris isolate (M isolate), established from wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus, Isle of May, UK), in their capacity to infect laboratory mice. High dose infection of C57BL/6 mice revealed that significantly more parasites of the M isolate survived to the adult stage compared to the E isolate. Worm persistence was associated with heightened TNF-α and IL-10 secretion upon parasite-specific re-stimulation, and higher serum IgG1 and IgG2c levels, concomitant with an increase in T-bet<sup>+</sup> and ICOS<sup>+</sup> CD4<sup>+</sup> T effector-memory cells. Differences in host response to the isolates were not as pronounced during low dose infection. Our study highlights the need for regular evaluation of lab-maintained parasite isolates against freshly isolated parasites to understand whether the established lab strains remain relevant model systems for our understanding of parasitic infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":19931,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T. Muris Infection Dynamics of a Fresh, Wild Isolate: Is the Established E Isolate Still Relevant?\",\"authors\":\"Iris Mair, Alexander R Bennett, Ruth Forman, Abdulrazzag A Othman, Larisa Logunova, Hannah Smith, Ann E Lowe, Janette E Bradley, David J Thornton, Kathryn J Else\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pim.13072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For decades, parasitic worms such as Trichuris muris have been maintained in laboratory animals, providing insights into host-parasite interactions and host immune responses. The most used T. muris isolate is the E isolate, established in the laboratory in 1954. However, one concern with these model systems is the potential for laboratory-induced selection and therefore changes in host-parasite interactions. To address these concerns, we compare the E isolate with a recently isolated T. muris isolate (M isolate), established from wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus, Isle of May, UK), in their capacity to infect laboratory mice. High dose infection of C57BL/6 mice revealed that significantly more parasites of the M isolate survived to the adult stage compared to the E isolate. Worm persistence was associated with heightened TNF-α and IL-10 secretion upon parasite-specific re-stimulation, and higher serum IgG1 and IgG2c levels, concomitant with an increase in T-bet<sup>+</sup> and ICOS<sup>+</sup> CD4<sup>+</sup> T effector-memory cells. Differences in host response to the isolates were not as pronounced during low dose infection. Our study highlights the need for regular evaluation of lab-maintained parasite isolates against freshly isolated parasites to understand whether the established lab strains remain relevant model systems for our understanding of parasitic infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasite Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasite Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.13072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.13072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,人们一直在实验室动物体内饲养毛滴虫等寄生蠕虫,以深入了解宿主与寄生虫之间的相互作用以及宿主的免疫反应。最常用的毛滴虫分离株是 1954 年在实验室建立的 E 分离株。然而,这些模型系统的一个问题是可能会出现实验室诱导的选择,从而改变宿主与寄生虫之间的相互作用。为了解决这些问题,我们比较了 E 分离物与最近从野生家鼠(英国梅岛家鼠)中分离出的 T. muris 分离物(M 分离物)感染实验室小鼠的能力。对 C57BL/6 小鼠进行高剂量感染后发现,与 E 型分离株相比,M 型分离株中存活到成虫阶段的寄生虫数量要多得多。寄生虫的持续存在与寄生虫特异性再刺激时 TNF-α 和 IL-10 分泌增加、血清 IgG1 和 IgG2c 水平升高以及 T-bet+ 和 ICOS+ CD4+ T 效应记忆细胞增加有关。在低剂量感染期间,宿主对分离株的反应差异并不明显。我们的研究强调了定期评估实验室保存的寄生虫分离株与新鲜分离的寄生虫的必要性,以了解已建立的实验室菌株是否仍是我们了解寄生虫感染的相关模型系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T. Muris Infection Dynamics of a Fresh, Wild Isolate: Is the Established E Isolate Still Relevant?

For decades, parasitic worms such as Trichuris muris have been maintained in laboratory animals, providing insights into host-parasite interactions and host immune responses. The most used T. muris isolate is the E isolate, established in the laboratory in 1954. However, one concern with these model systems is the potential for laboratory-induced selection and therefore changes in host-parasite interactions. To address these concerns, we compare the E isolate with a recently isolated T. muris isolate (M isolate), established from wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus, Isle of May, UK), in their capacity to infect laboratory mice. High dose infection of C57BL/6 mice revealed that significantly more parasites of the M isolate survived to the adult stage compared to the E isolate. Worm persistence was associated with heightened TNF-α and IL-10 secretion upon parasite-specific re-stimulation, and higher serum IgG1 and IgG2c levels, concomitant with an increase in T-bet+ and ICOS+ CD4+ T effector-memory cells. Differences in host response to the isolates were not as pronounced during low dose infection. Our study highlights the need for regular evaluation of lab-maintained parasite isolates against freshly isolated parasites to understand whether the established lab strains remain relevant model systems for our understanding of parasitic infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasite Immunology
Parasite Immunology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Immunology is an international journal devoted to research on all aspects of parasite immunology in human and animal hosts. Emphasis has been placed on how hosts control parasites, and the immunopathological reactions which take place in the course of parasitic infections. The Journal welcomes original work on all parasites, particularly human parasitology, helminths, protozoa and ectoparasites.
期刊最新文献
T. Muris Infection Dynamics of a Fresh, Wild Isolate: Is the Established E Isolate Still Relevant? Schistosomicidal Effects of Moringa oleifera Seed Oil Extract on Schistosoma mansoni-Infected Mice. Immune Response in Cattle Trypanosomosis and Trypanotolerance: Main Findings and Gaps. Safety and Immunogenicity of an FhSAMS Vaccine Against Fasciola hepatica in Dairy Cattle. Toxoplasma gondii Infection of BALB/c Mice Perturbs Host Neurochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1