颞叶脑瘤和脑脊液漏治疗的延误。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004338
Maggie Mouzourakis, Peter Steinwald, Anne K Maxwell, Ari Saravia, Adam Master, Nicholas Mankowski, James E Saunders, Grace M Materne, Kathryn Noonan
{"title":"颞叶脑瘤和脑脊液漏治疗的延误。","authors":"Maggie Mouzourakis, Peter Steinwald, Anne K Maxwell, Ari Saravia, Adam Master, Nicholas Mankowski, James E Saunders, Grace M Materne, Kathryn Noonan","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lateral skull base defects (LSBD) pose a diagnostic challenge; however, early recognition and treatment are important to avoid sequelae. This study examines the impact of health care disparities associated with time to diagnosis and treatment for patients with LSBD.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, patients, intervention, outcome measures: </strong>Multi-institutional retrospective cohort study at four U.S. tertiary centers from 2000 to 2022. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CSF leak or encephalocele were included. Multivariate regressions used to analyze how age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, language, zip code, distance to medical center, referral patterns, diagnostic workup, and clinical course affected time to diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 127 patients with LSBD, mean time to treatment of CSF leak or encephalocele was 13.9 months. On average, patients waited 10.6 months from initial assessment to diagnosis and saw 2 providers prior to diagnosis. Approximately 91% (115) of patients had a CT scan, and 75% (95) had an MRI. Imaging did not influence time to treatment. Older age, public insurance, and number of providers seen were associated with delays. Non-English speakers (5% of 127) encountered treatment delays, although this was not statistically significant. Fifty-eight (46%) people had private insurance. The average traveled distance for care was 62.6 miles. Clinical presentation, race, zip code, imaging, myringotomy, beta-2 transferrin, and ED workup were not found to be associated with delays to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significant delays in diagnosis and management of LSBD. Referral patterns did influence care. Health care disparities did not impact care; however, disparities and language barriers need to be studied further to determine contributions to delays in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delays in Treatment for Temporal Encephaloceles and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks.\",\"authors\":\"Maggie Mouzourakis, Peter Steinwald, Anne K Maxwell, Ari Saravia, Adam Master, Nicholas Mankowski, James E Saunders, Grace M Materne, Kathryn Noonan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lateral skull base defects (LSBD) pose a diagnostic challenge; however, early recognition and treatment are important to avoid sequelae. This study examines the impact of health care disparities associated with time to diagnosis and treatment for patients with LSBD.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, patients, intervention, outcome measures: </strong>Multi-institutional retrospective cohort study at four U.S. tertiary centers from 2000 to 2022. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CSF leak or encephalocele were included. Multivariate regressions used to analyze how age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, language, zip code, distance to medical center, referral patterns, diagnostic workup, and clinical course affected time to diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 127 patients with LSBD, mean time to treatment of CSF leak or encephalocele was 13.9 months. On average, patients waited 10.6 months from initial assessment to diagnosis and saw 2 providers prior to diagnosis. Approximately 91% (115) of patients had a CT scan, and 75% (95) had an MRI. Imaging did not influence time to treatment. Older age, public insurance, and number of providers seen were associated with delays. Non-English speakers (5% of 127) encountered treatment delays, although this was not statistically significant. Fifty-eight (46%) people had private insurance. The average traveled distance for care was 62.6 miles. Clinical presentation, race, zip code, imaging, myringotomy, beta-2 transferrin, and ED workup were not found to be associated with delays to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significant delays in diagnosis and management of LSBD. Referral patterns did influence care. Health care disparities did not impact care; however, disparities and language barriers need to be studied further to determine contributions to delays in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004338\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:侧颅底缺损(LSBD)给诊断带来了挑战;然而,早期识别和治疗对于避免后遗症非常重要。本研究探讨了与LSBD患者诊断和治疗时间相关的医疗差距的影响:2000年至2022年在美国四家三级医疗中心进行的多机构回顾性队列研究。研究纳入了主要诊断为脑脊液漏或脑积水的成人患者。采用多变量回归分析年龄、性别、种族/民族、保险、语言、邮政编码、到医疗中心的距离、转诊模式、诊断工作和临床过程对诊断和治疗时间的影响:在127名LSBD患者中,治疗脑脊液漏或脑积水的平均时间为13.9个月。患者从初次评估到确诊平均需要等待 10.6 个月,确诊前看了 2 家医疗机构。约 91% 的患者(115 人)进行了 CT 扫描,75% 的患者(95 人)进行了 MRI 扫描。成像检查并不影响治疗时间。高龄、公共保险和就诊人数与治疗延迟有关。非英语国家的患者(127 人中占 5%)会遇到治疗延误,但这一比例在统计学上并不显著。有 58 人(46%)购买了私人保险。平均就医距离为 62.6 英里。临床表现、种族、邮政编码、影像学、耳鸣切开术、β-2 转铁蛋白和急诊室检查均未发现与治疗延误有关:结论:LSBD的诊断和治疗存在严重延误。转诊模式确实影响了治疗。医疗保健方面的差异并未对治疗产生影响;但是,需要对差异和语言障碍进行进一步研究,以确定造成治疗延误的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delays in Treatment for Temporal Encephaloceles and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks.

Objective: Lateral skull base defects (LSBD) pose a diagnostic challenge; however, early recognition and treatment are important to avoid sequelae. This study examines the impact of health care disparities associated with time to diagnosis and treatment for patients with LSBD.

Study design, setting, patients, intervention, outcome measures: Multi-institutional retrospective cohort study at four U.S. tertiary centers from 2000 to 2022. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CSF leak or encephalocele were included. Multivariate regressions used to analyze how age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, language, zip code, distance to medical center, referral patterns, diagnostic workup, and clinical course affected time to diagnosis and treatment.

Results: In 127 patients with LSBD, mean time to treatment of CSF leak or encephalocele was 13.9 months. On average, patients waited 10.6 months from initial assessment to diagnosis and saw 2 providers prior to diagnosis. Approximately 91% (115) of patients had a CT scan, and 75% (95) had an MRI. Imaging did not influence time to treatment. Older age, public insurance, and number of providers seen were associated with delays. Non-English speakers (5% of 127) encountered treatment delays, although this was not statistically significant. Fifty-eight (46%) people had private insurance. The average traveled distance for care was 62.6 miles. Clinical presentation, race, zip code, imaging, myringotomy, beta-2 transferrin, and ED workup were not found to be associated with delays to care.

Conclusion: There are significant delays in diagnosis and management of LSBD. Referral patterns did influence care. Health care disparities did not impact care; however, disparities and language barriers need to be studied further to determine contributions to delays in care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1