内窥镜胃底折叠术:治疗胃食管反流病的新方法。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.557
Eyad Gadour, Anna Carolina Hoff
{"title":"内窥镜胃底折叠术:治疗胃食管反流病的新方法。","authors":"Eyad Gadour, Anna Carolina Hoff","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric fundoplication with endoscopic technique (GFET) is an innovative approach to managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This minimally invasive procedure utilizes the GEN-2 Apollo endosuture device and Olympus H2T180 gastroscope to perform partial fundoplication by strategically placing Prolene 2-0 sutures at the 11, 7, 5, 1, and 3 o'clock positions around the gastroesophageal junction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether GFET enhances the lower esophageal sphincter function by creating comprehensive plication to improve the barrier against reflux.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective study included patients undergoing GFET. Before beginning GFET, pH metrics and subsequent manometric measurements were obtained. An analysis of variance was performed to determine statistically significant differences between quality of life (QOL) and DeMeester scores at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pearson's <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test was performed to identify statistically significant differences between categorical variables at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were enrolled (11 males and 7 females; mean age, 35 years). More than 70% had an initial Hill grade of IIb. One adverse event was recorded after the procedure. One patient underwent valve reinforcement at 12 months. The mean QOL score was markedly higher at the time of the procedure (39.9 ± 4.0) compared to those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Scores at 12 months were slightly higher than those at 6 months. The highest mean QOL score was observed at the time of the procedure, followed by those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A similar trend was noted for the mean DeMeester scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GFET is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical interventions and endoscopic techniques for managing GERD. Further research is warranted to validate its long-term efficacy and effectiveness over existing treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 10","pages":"557-565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric fundoplication with endoscopic technique: A novel approach for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Eyad Gadour, Anna Carolina Hoff\",\"doi\":\"10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric fundoplication with endoscopic technique (GFET) is an innovative approach to managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This minimally invasive procedure utilizes the GEN-2 Apollo endosuture device and Olympus H2T180 gastroscope to perform partial fundoplication by strategically placing Prolene 2-0 sutures at the 11, 7, 5, 1, and 3 o'clock positions around the gastroesophageal junction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether GFET enhances the lower esophageal sphincter function by creating comprehensive plication to improve the barrier against reflux.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective study included patients undergoing GFET. Before beginning GFET, pH metrics and subsequent manometric measurements were obtained. An analysis of variance was performed to determine statistically significant differences between quality of life (QOL) and DeMeester scores at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pearson's <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> test was performed to identify statistically significant differences between categorical variables at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants were enrolled (11 males and 7 females; mean age, 35 years). More than 70% had an initial Hill grade of IIb. One adverse event was recorded after the procedure. One patient underwent valve reinforcement at 12 months. The mean QOL score was markedly higher at the time of the procedure (39.9 ± 4.0) compared to those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Scores at 12 months were slightly higher than those at 6 months. The highest mean QOL score was observed at the time of the procedure, followed by those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A similar trend was noted for the mean DeMeester scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GFET is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical interventions and endoscopic techniques for managing GERD. Further research is warranted to validate its long-term efficacy and effectiveness over existing treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"557-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内窥镜胃底折叠术(GFET)是治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的一种创新方法。这种微创手术利用 GEN-2 阿波罗内缝合器和奥林巴斯 H2T180 胃镜,通过在胃食管交界处的 11、7、5、1 和 3 点钟位置战略性地放置 Prolene 2-0 缝合线,进行部分胃底折叠术:这项单中心前瞻性研究包括接受 GFET 的患者。在开始 GFET 之前,进行了 pH 值测量和随后的压力测量。研究人员进行了方差分析,以确定手术时、术后 6 个月和 12 个月的生活质量(QOL)和 DeMeester 评分之间的显著统计学差异。进行了皮尔逊χ 2 检验,以确定手术时、术后 6 个月和 12 个月的分类变量之间的统计学差异:18名参与者(11名男性,7名女性;平均年龄35岁)接受了手术。超过 70% 的患者最初的希尔等级为 IIb。术后记录到一起不良事件。一名患者在 12 个月时接受了瓣膜加固术。手术时的平均 QOL 评分(39.9 ± 4.0)明显高于术后 6 个月和 12 个月时(P < 0.001)。12 个月时的评分略高于 6 个月时的评分。手术时的平均 QOL 分数最高,其次是术后 6 个月和 12 个月(P < 0.001)。DeMeester 评分的平均值也呈类似趋势(P < 0.001):结论:GFET 是治疗胃食管反流病的传统手术干预和内窥镜技术的微创替代方法。结论:GFET 是治疗胃食管反流病的传统外科手术和内窥镜技术的微创替代方法,需要进一步研究验证其长期疗效和对现有治疗方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gastric fundoplication with endoscopic technique: A novel approach for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment.

Background: Gastric fundoplication with endoscopic technique (GFET) is an innovative approach to managing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This minimally invasive procedure utilizes the GEN-2 Apollo endosuture device and Olympus H2T180 gastroscope to perform partial fundoplication by strategically placing Prolene 2-0 sutures at the 11, 7, 5, 1, and 3 o'clock positions around the gastroesophageal junction.

Aim: To evaluate whether GFET enhances the lower esophageal sphincter function by creating comprehensive plication to improve the barrier against reflux.

Methods: This single-center prospective study included patients undergoing GFET. Before beginning GFET, pH metrics and subsequent manometric measurements were obtained. An analysis of variance was performed to determine statistically significant differences between quality of life (QOL) and DeMeester scores at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pearson's χ 2 test was performed to identify statistically significant differences between categorical variables at the time of the procedure and 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: Eighteen participants were enrolled (11 males and 7 females; mean age, 35 years). More than 70% had an initial Hill grade of IIb. One adverse event was recorded after the procedure. One patient underwent valve reinforcement at 12 months. The mean QOL score was markedly higher at the time of the procedure (39.9 ± 4.0) compared to those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). Scores at 12 months were slightly higher than those at 6 months. The highest mean QOL score was observed at the time of the procedure, followed by those at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). A similar trend was noted for the mean DeMeester scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: GFET is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical interventions and endoscopic techniques for managing GERD. Further research is warranted to validate its long-term efficacy and effectiveness over existing treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
期刊最新文献
Motorized spiral enteroscopy: A cautious step forward in technological innovation. Postprandial gastrin-17 level is a useful dynamic marker for atrophic gastritis. Role of macroscopic on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy: Results of a multicentric prospective study. Systemic air embolism associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A case report. Treatment of choice for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: More than clearing the road.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1