健康志愿者对中等至大容量皮下注射的可接受性调查:单中心随机对照研究结果。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S479507
Chika Akinseye, Andrew Fiorini, Emily Louise Jarvis, Michelle Fry, Abid Raza, Sara Soleman, Stephanie Igwe, Mark Palmer
{"title":"健康志愿者对中等至大容量皮下注射的可接受性调查:单中心随机对照研究结果。","authors":"Chika Akinseye, Andrew Fiorini, Emily Louise Jarvis, Michelle Fry, Abid Raza, Sara Soleman, Stephanie Igwe, Mark Palmer","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S479507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Therapeutic proteins are often delivered by subcutaneous (SC) autoinjector to enable self-administration. Autoinjectors typically deliver up to 1 mL injected volumes per dose. Delivery of larger volumes may be limited by injection site discomfort, including pain, swelling, and redness. Delivery at a slower rate may mitigate this discomfort. This single-center, randomized, crossover study evaluated the acceptability and tolerability of varying volumes and delivery rates of SC saline in healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adults (18-65 years) with a body mass index of 18.5-32.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Participants (N = 24) were randomized to multiple sequences of infusions over five visits, with infusions ranging from 1 to 5 mL at rates of 1.50-6.00 mL/minute (min) and including a 1 mL SC infusion in 10 seconds (s) at a rate of 6.00 mL/min. The primary objective was to identify acceptable volume and delivery rates of SC saline, as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, a tolerability and acceptability questionnaire, and infusion leakage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infusions that met the acceptability criteria were 1 mL in 10s, 4 mL in 58s, and 3 mL in 2 mins. Higher delivery volumes and rates were associated with higher VAS pain scores but remained within the VAS acceptability criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings may support the development of larger-volume injectors for self-administration of future medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"369-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into the Acceptability of Moderate-to-Large Volume Subcutaneous Injections in Healthy Volunteers: Results from a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chika Akinseye, Andrew Fiorini, Emily Louise Jarvis, Michelle Fry, Abid Raza, Sara Soleman, Stephanie Igwe, Mark Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S479507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Therapeutic proteins are often delivered by subcutaneous (SC) autoinjector to enable self-administration. Autoinjectors typically deliver up to 1 mL injected volumes per dose. Delivery of larger volumes may be limited by injection site discomfort, including pain, swelling, and redness. Delivery at a slower rate may mitigate this discomfort. This single-center, randomized, crossover study evaluated the acceptability and tolerability of varying volumes and delivery rates of SC saline in healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adults (18-65 years) with a body mass index of 18.5-32.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Participants (N = 24) were randomized to multiple sequences of infusions over five visits, with infusions ranging from 1 to 5 mL at rates of 1.50-6.00 mL/minute (min) and including a 1 mL SC infusion in 10 seconds (s) at a rate of 6.00 mL/min. The primary objective was to identify acceptable volume and delivery rates of SC saline, as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, a tolerability and acceptability questionnaire, and infusion leakage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infusions that met the acceptability criteria were 1 mL in 10s, 4 mL in 58s, and 3 mL in 2 mins. Higher delivery volumes and rates were associated with higher VAS pain scores but remained within the VAS acceptability criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings may support the development of larger-volume injectors for self-administration of future medicines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"369-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S479507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S479507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:治疗性蛋白质通常通过皮下自动注射器(SC)给药,以实现自我给药。自动注射器每次给药的注射量通常不超过 1 毫升。注射部位的不适(包括疼痛、肿胀和发红)可能会限制较大剂量的给药。以较慢的速度给药可减轻这种不适感。这项单中心、随机、交叉研究评估了健康志愿者对不同生理盐水注射量和注射速度的接受度和耐受性:符合条件的参与者均为成年人(18-65 岁),体重指数为 18.5-32.0 kg/m2。参与者(N = 24)在五次访问中被随机分配到多个输注序列,输注量从 1 毫升到 5 毫升不等,输注速度为 1.50-6.00 毫升/分钟,其中包括在 10 秒 (s) 内以 6.00 毫升/分钟的速度输注 1 毫升生理盐水。主要目的是确定可接受的生理盐水输注量和输注速度,并通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、耐受性和可接受性问卷以及输液渗漏进行评估:符合可接受性标准的输液量分别为 10 秒内 1 毫升、58 秒内 4 毫升和 2 分钟内 3 毫升。输液量和输液速度越大,VAS 疼痛评分越高,但仍符合 VAS 可接受性标准:这些研究结果可能有助于开发用于未来自我给药的大容量注射器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation into the Acceptability of Moderate-to-Large Volume Subcutaneous Injections in Healthy Volunteers: Results from a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study.

Purpose: Therapeutic proteins are often delivered by subcutaneous (SC) autoinjector to enable self-administration. Autoinjectors typically deliver up to 1 mL injected volumes per dose. Delivery of larger volumes may be limited by injection site discomfort, including pain, swelling, and redness. Delivery at a slower rate may mitigate this discomfort. This single-center, randomized, crossover study evaluated the acceptability and tolerability of varying volumes and delivery rates of SC saline in healthy volunteers.

Patients and methods: Eligible participants were adults (18-65 years) with a body mass index of 18.5-32.0 kg/m2. Participants (N = 24) were randomized to multiple sequences of infusions over five visits, with infusions ranging from 1 to 5 mL at rates of 1.50-6.00 mL/minute (min) and including a 1 mL SC infusion in 10 seconds (s) at a rate of 6.00 mL/min. The primary objective was to identify acceptable volume and delivery rates of SC saline, as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, a tolerability and acceptability questionnaire, and infusion leakage.

Results: Infusions that met the acceptability criteria were 1 mL in 10s, 4 mL in 58s, and 3 mL in 2 mins. Higher delivery volumes and rates were associated with higher VAS pain scores but remained within the VAS acceptability criteria.

Conclusion: These findings may support the development of larger-volume injectors for self-administration of future medicines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Initial Validation of the NOL Nociception Level Index® Monitoring System in Black and Multiracial People. Potential of Aluminum Drug Packages with Press-Through Packaging Considering Usability for a Wide Range of Users. The Application Effect of Fine Management Combined with Man-Machine Fixation Mode in Reducing the Attrition Rate of Laparoscopic Instruments-A Non-Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Study. Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections. May Glymphatic Drainage Improve Life Quality in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Outpatients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1