针对成人门诊患者的同步远程药学护理模式:系统综述。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005
Centaine L Snoswell, Keshia De Guzman, Laura J Neil, Tara Isaacs, Roshni Mendis, Monica L Taylor, Marissa Ryan
{"title":"针对成人门诊患者的同步远程药学护理模式:系统综述。","authors":"Centaine L Snoswell, Keshia De Guzman, Laura J Neil, Tara Isaacs, Roshni Mendis, Monica L Taylor, Marissa Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telephone and video consultations have been used as telepharmacy modalities for a number of years, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic where in-person services were limited. However, a widespread global literature review has yet to be completed on studies since June 2016 regarding the effectiveness of telephone and video consultations as telepharmacy models.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review was to summarise the synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients since June 2016. The secondary aim was to report on the effect of these models on clinical, service, and user-perspectives and non-clinical outcomes compared to the standard model of care, as well as facilitators and barriers of the telepharmacy models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PROSPERO registered systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase in March 2023. Key search terms included pharmacy, telepharmacy, and outpatient; data extraction and narrative analysis were then performed and NHMRC level of evidence determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2129 unique articles reviewed, 103 were eligible for inclusion. Synchronous telepharmacy services in an outpatient setting were delivered by telephone consultations and video consultations, with the majority being delivered by the telephone modality (87 %) and the remainder by video (13 %). Services primarily involved a pharmacist providing a single consultation with a patient. The purpose of this was either to provide counselling, obtain a best possible medication history, or to provide ongoing support as part of a clinical program, such as diabetes and blood pressure monitoring. Patients reported the quality of care received through telepharmacy consultations provided the same level of care or was superior to in-person services. Key facilitators for the success of telepharmacy services were access to training, technical assistance, digital literacy and availability of technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telephone and video telepharmacy services are being delivered across a range of outpatient clinical areas. More evidence is needed for video consultation services and how this modality may potentially provide further benefit for certain clinical tasks such as counselling and use of medication delivery devices. Overall, telepharmacy services enhance patient accessibility to healthcare and offer a convenient method of delivering high quality services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Centaine L Snoswell, Keshia De Guzman, Laura J Neil, Tara Isaacs, Roshni Mendis, Monica L Taylor, Marissa Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telephone and video consultations have been used as telepharmacy modalities for a number of years, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic where in-person services were limited. However, a widespread global literature review has yet to be completed on studies since June 2016 regarding the effectiveness of telephone and video consultations as telepharmacy models.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review was to summarise the synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients since June 2016. The secondary aim was to report on the effect of these models on clinical, service, and user-perspectives and non-clinical outcomes compared to the standard model of care, as well as facilitators and barriers of the telepharmacy models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PROSPERO registered systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase in March 2023. Key search terms included pharmacy, telepharmacy, and outpatient; data extraction and narrative analysis were then performed and NHMRC level of evidence determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2129 unique articles reviewed, 103 were eligible for inclusion. Synchronous telepharmacy services in an outpatient setting were delivered by telephone consultations and video consultations, with the majority being delivered by the telephone modality (87 %) and the remainder by video (13 %). Services primarily involved a pharmacist providing a single consultation with a patient. The purpose of this was either to provide counselling, obtain a best possible medication history, or to provide ongoing support as part of a clinical program, such as diabetes and blood pressure monitoring. Patients reported the quality of care received through telepharmacy consultations provided the same level of care or was superior to in-person services. Key facilitators for the success of telepharmacy services were access to training, technical assistance, digital literacy and availability of technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telephone and video telepharmacy services are being delivered across a range of outpatient clinical areas. More evidence is needed for video consultation services and how this modality may potentially provide further benefit for certain clinical tasks such as counselling and use of medication delivery devices. Overall, telepharmacy services enhance patient accessibility to healthcare and offer a convenient method of delivering high quality services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电话和视频会诊作为远程药学模式已使用多年,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,因为当时现场服务有限。然而,自 2016 年 6 月以来,有关电话和视频会诊作为远程药学模式的有效性研究的广泛全球文献综述尚未完成:本综述旨在总结自 2016 年 6 月以来针对成人门诊患者的同步远程药学护理模式。次要目的是报告与标准护理模式相比,这些模式对临床、服务、用户观点和非临床结果的影响,以及远程药学模式的促进因素和障碍:方法:2023 年 3 月,使用 PubMed、CINAHL 和 Embase 进行了 PROSPERO 注册系统综述。关键检索词包括药学、远程药学和门诊病人;然后进行数据提取和叙事分析,并确定 NHMRC 的证据级别:结果:在2129篇文章中,有103篇符合纳入条件。门诊环境中的同步远程药学服务通过电话咨询和视频咨询提供,其中大部分通过电话方式提供(87%),其余通过视频方式提供(13%)。服务主要包括药剂师为患者提供一次咨询。这样做的目的要么是提供咨询、获取最佳用药史,要么是作为临床项目(如糖尿病和血压监测)的一部分提供持续支持。患者表示,通过远程药学咨询获得的医疗服务质量与面对面服务的质量相同或更优。促进远程药学服务取得成功的主要因素包括获得培训、技术援助、数字扫盲和技术可用性:结论:电话和视频远程药学服务正在门诊临床领域广泛开展。还需要更多的证据来证明视频咨询服务,以及这种模式如何为某些临床任务(如咨询和给药设备的使用)提供潜在的更多益处。总体而言,远程药学服务提高了患者获得医疗保健服务的可及性,并提供了一种提供高质量服务的便捷方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients: A systematic review.

Background: Telephone and video consultations have been used as telepharmacy modalities for a number of years, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic where in-person services were limited. However, a widespread global literature review has yet to be completed on studies since June 2016 regarding the effectiveness of telephone and video consultations as telepharmacy models.

Objectives: The aim of this review was to summarise the synchronous telepharmacy models of care for adult outpatients since June 2016. The secondary aim was to report on the effect of these models on clinical, service, and user-perspectives and non-clinical outcomes compared to the standard model of care, as well as facilitators and barriers of the telepharmacy models.

Methods: A PROSPERO registered systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase in March 2023. Key search terms included pharmacy, telepharmacy, and outpatient; data extraction and narrative analysis were then performed and NHMRC level of evidence determined.

Results: From 2129 unique articles reviewed, 103 were eligible for inclusion. Synchronous telepharmacy services in an outpatient setting were delivered by telephone consultations and video consultations, with the majority being delivered by the telephone modality (87 %) and the remainder by video (13 %). Services primarily involved a pharmacist providing a single consultation with a patient. The purpose of this was either to provide counselling, obtain a best possible medication history, or to provide ongoing support as part of a clinical program, such as diabetes and blood pressure monitoring. Patients reported the quality of care received through telepharmacy consultations provided the same level of care or was superior to in-person services. Key facilitators for the success of telepharmacy services were access to training, technical assistance, digital literacy and availability of technology.

Conclusions: Telephone and video telepharmacy services are being delivered across a range of outpatient clinical areas. More evidence is needed for video consultation services and how this modality may potentially provide further benefit for certain clinical tasks such as counselling and use of medication delivery devices. Overall, telepharmacy services enhance patient accessibility to healthcare and offer a convenient method of delivering high quality services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
Concordance between pharmacy dispensing and electronic monitoring data of direct oral anticoagulants - A secondary analysis of the MAAESTRO study. Development and validation of a predictive scoring model for risk stratification of tuberculosis treatment interruption. The effects of free prescriptions on community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1