{"title":"教师在知识上的谦逊有利于青少年的兴趣和学习。","authors":"Tenelle Porter, Mark R Leary, Andrei Cimpian","doi":"10.1037/dev0001843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expression of intellectual humility-publicly admitting confusion, ignorance, and mistakes-can benefit individuals, but can it also benefit others? Five studies tested the hypothesis that teachers' expressions of intellectual humility would boost U.S. students' motivation and engagement in learning. In two pilot studies (one preregistered, combined <i>N</i> = 231), adults (50% women; 58% White, 25% Black) and adolescents (48% girls; 53% White, 33% Hispanic) anticipated being most comfortable expressing intellectual humility and interested in a hypothetical math class when a teacher's class description modeled the expression of intellectual humility relative to when the teacher recommended that students show intellectual humility or mentioned nothing about intellectual humility. Two fully powered, preregistered experiments with undergraduates (both 50% women; Study 3: 58% Asian, 17% Hispanic or Latinx, 16% White; Study 4: 53% White, 16% Asian, 16% Hispanic or Latinx; combined <i>N</i> = 767) replicated these effects and identified three mechanisms: an increase in a sense of acceptance by the teacher, an increase in the sense of belonging with peers, and a decrease in the belief that failure hurts learning. Study 5 (preregistered) revealed that high school students (51% girls; 92% White; <i>N</i> = 411) were more interested and engaged in their classes when they perceived their teachers to be more intellectually humble, with the largest benefits for young women. Longitudinally, teachers' modeling intellectual humility predicted changes in students' grades via a willingness to express intellectual humility. Teachers' intellectual humility may benefit students' interest, engagement, and learning in school. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers' intellectual humility benefits adolescents' interest and learning.\",\"authors\":\"Tenelle Porter, Mark R Leary, Andrei Cimpian\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0001843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The expression of intellectual humility-publicly admitting confusion, ignorance, and mistakes-can benefit individuals, but can it also benefit others? Five studies tested the hypothesis that teachers' expressions of intellectual humility would boost U.S. students' motivation and engagement in learning. In two pilot studies (one preregistered, combined <i>N</i> = 231), adults (50% women; 58% White, 25% Black) and adolescents (48% girls; 53% White, 33% Hispanic) anticipated being most comfortable expressing intellectual humility and interested in a hypothetical math class when a teacher's class description modeled the expression of intellectual humility relative to when the teacher recommended that students show intellectual humility or mentioned nothing about intellectual humility. Two fully powered, preregistered experiments with undergraduates (both 50% women; Study 3: 58% Asian, 17% Hispanic or Latinx, 16% White; Study 4: 53% White, 16% Asian, 16% Hispanic or Latinx; combined <i>N</i> = 767) replicated these effects and identified three mechanisms: an increase in a sense of acceptance by the teacher, an increase in the sense of belonging with peers, and a decrease in the belief that failure hurts learning. Study 5 (preregistered) revealed that high school students (51% girls; 92% White; <i>N</i> = 411) were more interested and engaged in their classes when they perceived their teachers to be more intellectually humble, with the largest benefits for young women. Longitudinally, teachers' modeling intellectual humility predicted changes in students' grades via a willingness to express intellectual humility. Teachers' intellectual humility may benefit students' interest, engagement, and learning in school. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
知识上的谦逊--公开承认困惑、无知和错误--能使个人受益,但它也能使他人受益吗?五项研究测试了教师表达智力谦逊会提高美国学生学习动力和参与度的假设。在两项试点研究中(一项是预先登记的,总人数=231),成人(50%为女性;58%为白人,25%为黑人)和青少年(48%为女孩;53%为白人,33%为西班牙裔)预计,在教师的课堂描述中表现出智力上的谦逊时,相对于教师建议学生表现出智力上的谦逊或只字不提智力上的谦逊时,他们最乐意表现出智力上的谦逊,并对假定的数学课感兴趣。以本科生(均为 50%的女性;研究 3:58% 的亚裔、17% 的西班牙裔或拉丁裔、16% 的白人;研究 4:53% 的白人、16% 的亚裔、16% 的西班牙裔或拉丁裔;总人数 = 767 人)为对象的两项完全有效、预先注册的实验复制了这些效果,并确定了三种机制:教师接纳感的增强、与同伴的归属感的增强以及认为失败会影响学习的信念的减弱。研究 5(预注册)显示,当高中生(51% 为女生;92% 为白人;人数 = 411 人)认为他们的教师在智力上更谦虚时,他们对课堂更感兴趣,也更投入,其中年轻女性受益最大。从纵向来看,教师在知识上的谦虚可预测学生成绩的变化,因为学生愿意表达知识上的谦虚。教师在知识上的谦逊可能会使学生在学校的学习兴趣、参与度和学习效果受益匪浅。 (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
Teachers' intellectual humility benefits adolescents' interest and learning.
The expression of intellectual humility-publicly admitting confusion, ignorance, and mistakes-can benefit individuals, but can it also benefit others? Five studies tested the hypothesis that teachers' expressions of intellectual humility would boost U.S. students' motivation and engagement in learning. In two pilot studies (one preregistered, combined N = 231), adults (50% women; 58% White, 25% Black) and adolescents (48% girls; 53% White, 33% Hispanic) anticipated being most comfortable expressing intellectual humility and interested in a hypothetical math class when a teacher's class description modeled the expression of intellectual humility relative to when the teacher recommended that students show intellectual humility or mentioned nothing about intellectual humility. Two fully powered, preregistered experiments with undergraduates (both 50% women; Study 3: 58% Asian, 17% Hispanic or Latinx, 16% White; Study 4: 53% White, 16% Asian, 16% Hispanic or Latinx; combined N = 767) replicated these effects and identified three mechanisms: an increase in a sense of acceptance by the teacher, an increase in the sense of belonging with peers, and a decrease in the belief that failure hurts learning. Study 5 (preregistered) revealed that high school students (51% girls; 92% White; N = 411) were more interested and engaged in their classes when they perceived their teachers to be more intellectually humble, with the largest benefits for young women. Longitudinally, teachers' modeling intellectual humility predicted changes in students' grades via a willingness to express intellectual humility. Teachers' intellectual humility may benefit students' interest, engagement, and learning in school. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.