利用 "最大结果改善阈值 "预测初次全髋关节置换术后的杰出结果

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.119
David R Maldonado, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Saiswarnesh Padmanabhan, Nikhil Gattu, Mark F Schinsky, Benjamin G Domb
{"title":"利用 \"最大结果改善阈值 \"预测初次全髋关节置换术后的杰出结果","authors":"David R Maldonado, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Saiswarnesh Padmanabhan, Nikhil Gattu, Mark F Schinsky, Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The delta difference between baseline patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMS) and postoperative scores is used to measure success following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, statistical improvement is not necessarily equal to clinical benefit. The percentage of the maximal improvement (MOI) is a psychometric tool to determine clinical improvement. This study aimed to determine thresholds for the MOI for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS) following THA for osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary THA for hip osteoarthritis between October 2014 and July 2020. Patients who answered an anchor question for satisfaction and had baseline and minimum two-year follow-up scores were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine the MOI thresholds with the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 584 patients were included, 53.1% women and 46.9% men, who had a mean age of 57 years (± 10.4). Improvement was reported for all PROMS (P < 0.0001). The AUC values for MOI for the FJS, HHS, and VAS were 0.788, 0.839, and 0.805, respectively. The MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following primary THA for hip osteoarthritis, percentage thresholds for achieving the MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS for pain were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively. No preoperative predictors of achieving the MOI were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Outstanding Results Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using The Maximal Outcome Improvement Threshold.\",\"authors\":\"David R Maldonado, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Saiswarnesh Padmanabhan, Nikhil Gattu, Mark F Schinsky, Benjamin G Domb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The delta difference between baseline patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMS) and postoperative scores is used to measure success following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, statistical improvement is not necessarily equal to clinical benefit. The percentage of the maximal improvement (MOI) is a psychometric tool to determine clinical improvement. This study aimed to determine thresholds for the MOI for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS) following THA for osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary THA for hip osteoarthritis between October 2014 and July 2020. Patients who answered an anchor question for satisfaction and had baseline and minimum two-year follow-up scores were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine the MOI thresholds with the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 584 patients were included, 53.1% women and 46.9% men, who had a mean age of 57 years (± 10.4). Improvement was reported for all PROMS (P < 0.0001). The AUC values for MOI for the FJS, HHS, and VAS were 0.788, 0.839, and 0.805, respectively. The MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following primary THA for hip osteoarthritis, percentage thresholds for achieving the MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS for pain were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively. No preoperative predictors of achieving the MOI were identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基线患者报告结果测量评分(PROMS)与术后评分之间的差值被用来衡量初次全髋关节置换术(THA)的成功率。然而,统计上的改善并不一定等同于临床获益。最大改善百分比(MOI)是确定临床改善的心理测量工具。本研究旨在确定骨关节炎 THA 术后遗忘关节评分(FJS)、哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)的 MOI 临界值:对2014年10月至2020年7月期间因髋关节骨性关节炎接受初次THA的所有患者的数据进行回顾性审查。纳入了回答满意度锚定问题并有基线和至少两年随访评分的患者。进行了接收者操作特征曲线分析,以确定MOI阈值和曲线下面积(AUC):共纳入 584 名患者,其中女性占 53.1%,男性占 46.9%,平均年龄为 57 岁(± 10.4)。所有 PROMS 均有改善(P < 0.0001)。FJS、HHS 和 VAS 的 MOI AUC 值分别为 0.788、0.839 和 0.805。FJS、HHS和VAS的MOI分别为54.2%、65%和67.1%:结论:髋关节骨性关节炎的初次 THA 术后,FJS、HHS 和 VAS 的疼痛 MOI 临界值分别为 54.2%、65% 和 67.1%。术前未发现达到 MOI 的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Outstanding Results Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using The Maximal Outcome Improvement Threshold.

Background: The delta difference between baseline patient-reported outcome measure scores (PROMS) and postoperative scores is used to measure success following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, statistical improvement is not necessarily equal to clinical benefit. The percentage of the maximal improvement (MOI) is a psychometric tool to determine clinical improvement. This study aimed to determine thresholds for the MOI for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS) following THA for osteoarthritis.

Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary THA for hip osteoarthritis between October 2014 and July 2020. Patients who answered an anchor question for satisfaction and had baseline and minimum two-year follow-up scores were included. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine the MOI thresholds with the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: In total, 584 patients were included, 53.1% women and 46.9% men, who had a mean age of 57 years (± 10.4). Improvement was reported for all PROMS (P < 0.0001). The AUC values for MOI for the FJS, HHS, and VAS were 0.788, 0.839, and 0.805, respectively. The MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Following primary THA for hip osteoarthritis, percentage thresholds for achieving the MOI for the FJS, the HHS, and the VAS for pain were 54.2, 65, and 67.1%, respectively. No preoperative predictors of achieving the MOI were identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review of Gender and Sex Terminology Use in Arthroplasty Research: There Is Room for Improvement. Recognizing the Sex Disparity in Surgeons Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty. Decreased Risk of Readmission and Complications With Preoperative GLP-1 Analog Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. Increased Involvement of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the Rise of Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection With Concomitant Extensor Mechanism Disruption and Soft-Tissue Defect: The Knee Arthroplasty Terrible Triad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1