Bo Zheng, Ning Zhu, Mei Yu, Yun Guan, Zhong Zheng, Yaotiao Deng, Yu Jiang
{"title":"护理常规工作中筛查癌症患者自杀风险的单一问题:一项回顾性横断面研究。","authors":"Bo Zheng, Ning Zhu, Mei Yu, Yun Guan, Zhong Zheng, Yaotiao Deng, Yu Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jan.16591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the efficacy of the Single Suicide Question, a tactful single-item tool, in assessing suicide risk among cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide risk screening in cancer patients faces challenges such as cultural, the degree of attention given and the complexity and diversity of assessment methods. An efficient and simple suicide screening tool is needed within the nursing and treatment process.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>All data utilised in this study were obtained from assessments conducted by researchers at our institution between March 2018 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospectively analysed Single Suicide Question scores from 9703 patients (March 2018-August 2023), with 229 undergoing additional using other established tools (the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Distress Thermometer) alongside the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Suicidal Subscale (MINI Suicidal Subscale). These 229 patients were divided into the cut-off determination dataset (174/229) and the validation dataset (55/229) to analyse, validate and compare the screening efficacy, consistency and optimal cut-off points of the tools relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale (golden standard). K-fold cross-validation was employed to assess the stability of the Single Suicide Question and to revalidate its screening efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cut-off determination dataset, the Single Suicide Question exhibited good screening efficacy and substantial agreement relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale, as validated in the validation dataset, outperforming other tools. The optimal cut-off points of Single Suicide Question for screening moderate or higher and high suicide risk as 2 and 3 respectively. Its stability in K-fold cross-validation further supported its screening efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Single Suicide Question shows potential as a preliminary screening tool for suicide risk. Furthermore, it has also demonstrated the potential of a simple, tactful, culturally fitting question in assessing suicide risk, providing insight for the development of relevant tools in different cultural and linguistic backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Our study demonstrates the potential of the Single Suicide Question as a screening tool for identifying suicide risk among cancer patients, which may facilitate efficient suicide screening. Furthermore, it reveals that tactful, culturally fitting, yet simple tools can achieve good screening efficacy, providing insights for the development of similar tools in different cultural and linguistic contexts.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of using a culturally contextualised, specific single question to screen for suicide risk in Chinese cancer patients, demonstrating high screening efficacy and stability. With further research, this method may provide a tactful, culturally informed and efficient suicide screening approach to address the critical issue of suicide risk in cancer care, and it also serves as a reference for developing similar tools in diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The data provided by patients were the foundation of this study. Nurses played a central role in conducting the majority of assessments and contributing to the research design in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Question for Screening Suicide Risk in Patients With Cancer in Nursing Routine Work: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Zheng, Ning Zhu, Mei Yu, Yun Guan, Zhong Zheng, Yaotiao Deng, Yu Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the efficacy of the Single Suicide Question, a tactful single-item tool, in assessing suicide risk among cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide risk screening in cancer patients faces challenges such as cultural, the degree of attention given and the complexity and diversity of assessment methods. An efficient and simple suicide screening tool is needed within the nursing and treatment process.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>All data utilised in this study were obtained from assessments conducted by researchers at our institution between March 2018 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospectively analysed Single Suicide Question scores from 9703 patients (March 2018-August 2023), with 229 undergoing additional using other established tools (the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Distress Thermometer) alongside the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Suicidal Subscale (MINI Suicidal Subscale). These 229 patients were divided into the cut-off determination dataset (174/229) and the validation dataset (55/229) to analyse, validate and compare the screening efficacy, consistency and optimal cut-off points of the tools relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale (golden standard). K-fold cross-validation was employed to assess the stability of the Single Suicide Question and to revalidate its screening efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cut-off determination dataset, the Single Suicide Question exhibited good screening efficacy and substantial agreement relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale, as validated in the validation dataset, outperforming other tools. The optimal cut-off points of Single Suicide Question for screening moderate or higher and high suicide risk as 2 and 3 respectively. Its stability in K-fold cross-validation further supported its screening efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Single Suicide Question shows potential as a preliminary screening tool for suicide risk. Furthermore, it has also demonstrated the potential of a simple, tactful, culturally fitting question in assessing suicide risk, providing insight for the development of relevant tools in different cultural and linguistic backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Our study demonstrates the potential of the Single Suicide Question as a screening tool for identifying suicide risk among cancer patients, which may facilitate efficient suicide screening. Furthermore, it reveals that tactful, culturally fitting, yet simple tools can achieve good screening efficacy, providing insights for the development of similar tools in different cultural and linguistic contexts.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of using a culturally contextualised, specific single question to screen for suicide risk in Chinese cancer patients, demonstrating high screening efficacy and stability. With further research, this method may provide a tactful, culturally informed and efficient suicide screening approach to address the critical issue of suicide risk in cancer care, and it also serves as a reference for developing similar tools in diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The data provided by patients were the foundation of this study. Nurses played a central role in conducting the majority of assessments and contributing to the research design in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究单项自杀问题(一种机智的单项工具)在评估癌症患者自杀风险方面的有效性:背景:癌症患者自杀风险筛查面临着文化、关注程度以及评估方法的复杂性和多样性等挑战。在护理和治疗过程中,需要一种高效、简单的自杀筛查工具:数据来源:回顾性横断面研究:本研究使用的所有数据均来自本机构研究人员在 2018 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月期间进行的评估:回顾性分析了9703名患者(2018年3月至2023年8月)的单一自杀问题得分,其中229名患者在接受迷你国际神经精神访谈自杀分量表(MINI Suicidal Subscale)的同时,还接受了其他既定工具(患者健康问卷-9、广泛焦虑症-7、压力温度计)的额外评估。这 229 名患者被分为截点确定数据集(174/229)和验证数据集(55/229),以分析、验证和比较这些工具相对于迷你国际神经精神访谈自杀子量表(黄金标准)的筛查效果、一致性和最佳截点。采用 K 倍交叉验证来评估单一自杀问题的稳定性,并重新验证其筛查功效:结果:在确定截断点的数据集中,单一自杀问题表现出良好的筛查效果,与在验证数据集中验证过的 MINI 自杀子量表有很大的一致性,优于其他工具。单一自杀问题筛选中度或更高自杀风险和高自杀风险的最佳临界点分别为 2 和 3。它在 K 倍交叉验证中的稳定性进一步证明了其筛查功效:结论:"单一自杀问题 "显示出作为自杀风险初步筛查工具的潜力。结论:单一自杀问题显示了作为自杀风险初步筛查工具的潜力,此外,它还证明了一个简单、婉转、符合文化背景的问题在评估自杀风险方面的潜力,为在不同文化和语言背景下开发相关工具提供了启示:我们的研究表明,"单一自杀问题 "作为一种筛查工具,具有识别癌症患者自杀风险的潜力,可促进有效的自杀筛查。此外,研究还揭示了机智、符合文化背景且简单的工具也能达到良好的筛查效果,为在不同文化和语言背景下开发类似工具提供了启示:本研究调查了在中国癌症患者中使用符合文化背景的特定单个问题进行自杀风险筛查的有效性,结果表明该方法具有较高的筛查效率和稳定性。通过进一步研究,该方法可为解决癌症护理中的自杀风险这一关键问题提供一种有技巧、有文化背景且高效的自杀筛查方法,同时也为在不同文化和语言背景下开发类似工具提供了参考:报告方法:该研究遵循了 STROBE 横向研究核对表指南:患者或公众的贡献:患者提供的数据是本研究的基础。在本研究中,护士在进行大部分评估和研究设计方面发挥了核心作用。
Single Question for Screening Suicide Risk in Patients With Cancer in Nursing Routine Work: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Aim: To examine the efficacy of the Single Suicide Question, a tactful single-item tool, in assessing suicide risk among cancer patients.
Background: Suicide risk screening in cancer patients faces challenges such as cultural, the degree of attention given and the complexity and diversity of assessment methods. An efficient and simple suicide screening tool is needed within the nursing and treatment process.
Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Data sources: All data utilised in this study were obtained from assessments conducted by researchers at our institution between March 2018 and August 2023.
Methods: Retrospectively analysed Single Suicide Question scores from 9703 patients (March 2018-August 2023), with 229 undergoing additional using other established tools (the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Distress Thermometer) alongside the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Suicidal Subscale (MINI Suicidal Subscale). These 229 patients were divided into the cut-off determination dataset (174/229) and the validation dataset (55/229) to analyse, validate and compare the screening efficacy, consistency and optimal cut-off points of the tools relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale (golden standard). K-fold cross-validation was employed to assess the stability of the Single Suicide Question and to revalidate its screening efficacy.
Results: In cut-off determination dataset, the Single Suicide Question exhibited good screening efficacy and substantial agreement relative to the MINI Suicidal subscale, as validated in the validation dataset, outperforming other tools. The optimal cut-off points of Single Suicide Question for screening moderate or higher and high suicide risk as 2 and 3 respectively. Its stability in K-fold cross-validation further supported its screening efficacy.
Conclusion: The Single Suicide Question shows potential as a preliminary screening tool for suicide risk. Furthermore, it has also demonstrated the potential of a simple, tactful, culturally fitting question in assessing suicide risk, providing insight for the development of relevant tools in different cultural and linguistic backgrounds.
Implications for the profession and patient care: Our study demonstrates the potential of the Single Suicide Question as a screening tool for identifying suicide risk among cancer patients, which may facilitate efficient suicide screening. Furthermore, it reveals that tactful, culturally fitting, yet simple tools can achieve good screening efficacy, providing insights for the development of similar tools in different cultural and linguistic contexts.
Impact: This study investigated the effectiveness of using a culturally contextualised, specific single question to screen for suicide risk in Chinese cancer patients, demonstrating high screening efficacy and stability. With further research, this method may provide a tactful, culturally informed and efficient suicide screening approach to address the critical issue of suicide risk in cancer care, and it also serves as a reference for developing similar tools in diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.
Reporting method: The study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
Patient or public contribution: The data provided by patients were the foundation of this study. Nurses played a central role in conducting the majority of assessments and contributing to the research design in this study.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.