评估接受手术的青少年术后阿片类药物处方的开具和续订情况

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162007
Rabab M. Barq , Shadassa Ourshalimian , Laura Houshmand , Olivia A. Keane , Eugene Kim , Lorraine I. Kelley-Quon
{"title":"评估接受手术的青少年术后阿片类药物处方的开具和续订情况","authors":"Rabab M. Barq ,&nbsp;Shadassa Ourshalimian ,&nbsp;Laura Houshmand ,&nbsp;Olivia A. Keane ,&nbsp;Eugene Kim ,&nbsp;Lorraine I. Kelley-Quon","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are state-run databases that track controlled substances to reduce substance use and diversion. The accuracy of PDMPs for adolescents who receive postoperative opioid prescriptions is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study was conducted at a free-standing tertiary children’s hospital from 2019 to 2020. Adolescents 13-20 y undergoing elective surgery commonly associated with an opioid prescription at discharge were enrolled. Prescription opioid fills and refills were measured through five data sources: (1) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) prescription orders (2) postoperative clinic notes, (3) California’s PDMP and (4) adolescent and (5) parent surveys. UpSet plots were used to visualize and quantify data overlap between sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of the 55 adolescents enrolled were Hispanic/Latino (52.7%), female (54.5%), and underwent posterior spinal fusion (41.8%). Of 42 adolescents with an opioid prescription in the EMR, the greatest overlap in data sources occurred between the EMR and PDMP (92.9%) with only 19% of adolescents having their opioid prescription fill captured in all five data sources. Two patients (3.6%) who did not receive an opioid prescription based on EMR or survey data were identified in the PDMP. Survey data indicated that eight adolescents (19.0%) refilled their opioid prescription. However, the PDMP only captured four (9.5%) refills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Discrepancies exist among EMR, PDMP, and survey documentation of prescription opioid dispensing and refills for adolescents undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the need to capture multiple data sources when tracking prescription opioid dispensing. Additionally, there is opportunity for improved accuracy within prescription drug monitoring programs.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Prospective Cohort Study.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level 4.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 2","pages":"Article 162007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Postoperative Opioid Prescription Fills and Refills for Adolescents Undergoing Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Rabab M. Barq ,&nbsp;Shadassa Ourshalimian ,&nbsp;Laura Houshmand ,&nbsp;Olivia A. Keane ,&nbsp;Eugene Kim ,&nbsp;Lorraine I. Kelley-Quon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are state-run databases that track controlled substances to reduce substance use and diversion. The accuracy of PDMPs for adolescents who receive postoperative opioid prescriptions is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cohort study was conducted at a free-standing tertiary children’s hospital from 2019 to 2020. Adolescents 13-20 y undergoing elective surgery commonly associated with an opioid prescription at discharge were enrolled. Prescription opioid fills and refills were measured through five data sources: (1) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) prescription orders (2) postoperative clinic notes, (3) California’s PDMP and (4) adolescent and (5) parent surveys. UpSet plots were used to visualize and quantify data overlap between sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of the 55 adolescents enrolled were Hispanic/Latino (52.7%), female (54.5%), and underwent posterior spinal fusion (41.8%). Of 42 adolescents with an opioid prescription in the EMR, the greatest overlap in data sources occurred between the EMR and PDMP (92.9%) with only 19% of adolescents having their opioid prescription fill captured in all five data sources. Two patients (3.6%) who did not receive an opioid prescription based on EMR or survey data were identified in the PDMP. Survey data indicated that eight adolescents (19.0%) refilled their opioid prescription. However, the PDMP only captured four (9.5%) refills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Discrepancies exist among EMR, PDMP, and survey documentation of prescription opioid dispensing and refills for adolescents undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the need to capture multiple data sources when tracking prescription opioid dispensing. Additionally, there is opportunity for improved accuracy within prescription drug monitoring programs.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Prospective Cohort Study.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level 4.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 162007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346824009473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346824009473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言处方药监控计划(PDMP)是由州政府管理的数据库,用于追踪受管制药物,以减少药物使用和转移。这项前瞻性队列研究于 2019 年至 2020 年在一家独立的三级儿童医院进行。13-20 岁的青少年接受了通常与出院时阿片类药物处方相关的择期手术。阿片类药物处方的填写和重新填写通过五个数据源进行测量:(1)电子病历(EMR)处方单;(2)术后门诊记录;(3)加利福尼亚州 PDMP;(4)青少年调查;(5)家长调查。结果55名参加调查的青少年中,大多数为西班牙裔/拉丁裔(52.7%)、女性(54.5%),并接受了脊柱后路融合术(41.8%)。在 EMR 中有阿片类药物处方的 42 名青少年中,EMR 和 PDMP(92.9%)之间的数据源重叠最多,只有 19% 的青少年的阿片类药物处方在所有五个数据源中都有记录。根据 EMR 或调查数据,有两名患者(3.6%)未在 PDMP 中获得阿片类药物处方。调查数据显示,有 8 名青少年(19.0%)重新开具了阿片类药物处方。结论对于接受手术的青少年,EMR、PDMP 和调查中关于阿片类药物处方配药和重新配药的记录存在差异。这些发现凸显了在跟踪阿片类处方配药时获取多种数据源的必要性。此外,处方药监控计划的准确性也有提高的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Postoperative Opioid Prescription Fills and Refills for Adolescents Undergoing Surgery

Introduction

Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are state-run databases that track controlled substances to reduce substance use and diversion. The accuracy of PDMPs for adolescents who receive postoperative opioid prescriptions is unknown.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at a free-standing tertiary children’s hospital from 2019 to 2020. Adolescents 13-20 y undergoing elective surgery commonly associated with an opioid prescription at discharge were enrolled. Prescription opioid fills and refills were measured through five data sources: (1) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) prescription orders (2) postoperative clinic notes, (3) California’s PDMP and (4) adolescent and (5) parent surveys. UpSet plots were used to visualize and quantify data overlap between sources.

Results

The majority of the 55 adolescents enrolled were Hispanic/Latino (52.7%), female (54.5%), and underwent posterior spinal fusion (41.8%). Of 42 adolescents with an opioid prescription in the EMR, the greatest overlap in data sources occurred between the EMR and PDMP (92.9%) with only 19% of adolescents having their opioid prescription fill captured in all five data sources. Two patients (3.6%) who did not receive an opioid prescription based on EMR or survey data were identified in the PDMP. Survey data indicated that eight adolescents (19.0%) refilled their opioid prescription. However, the PDMP only captured four (9.5%) refills.

Conclusion

Discrepancies exist among EMR, PDMP, and survey documentation of prescription opioid dispensing and refills for adolescents undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the need to capture multiple data sources when tracking prescription opioid dispensing. Additionally, there is opportunity for improved accuracy within prescription drug monitoring programs.

Type of Study

Prospective Cohort Study.

Level of Evidence

Level 4.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Announcements of Future Meetings Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: National Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Utilization Prevent Injury by Providing Evidence. A Retrospective Nationwide Comparison of Laparoscopic vs Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1