Pei Chen , Zhuoshu Li , Yexinrui Wu , Hongbo Zhang , Jiaxuan Zhou , Lingyun Sun
{"title":"模式和保真度:了解创意刺激组合如何影响不同概念设计阶段的设计成果和过程","authors":"Pei Chen , Zhuoshu Li , Yexinrui Wu , Hongbo Zhang , Jiaxuan Zhou , Lingyun Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During conceptual design, creative stimuli are an external source of inspiration to support students’ ideation process. Although existing research has explored the roles of creative stimuli, they rarely consider the intertwined influence brought by stimuli’s multiple characteristics, and overlook variations in stimuli’s effectiveness at different design phases. To fill this gap, this research conducted a <span><math><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span> experiment, involving 72 design students in a three-phase design process and presenting combinations of textual and visual stimuli at distinct fidelities. We assessed different stimulus combinations’ influence on creativity, and employed behavior coding and linkograph to reveal students’ behavior and cognitive patterns throughout the process. The results revealed the mutual influence between the fidelity of texts and images, and students commonly needed more concrete stimuli in later design phases. Furthermore, students provided with different stimulus combinations exhibited variations in time allocation for behaviors including task analysis, idea generation, and evaluation, and they employed distinct approaches to generate new ideas. These findings highlight the necessity for design educators to dynamically provide creative stimuli based on the design phase, educational objective, and students’ state.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101657"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modality and fidelity: Understanding how creative stimulus combinations impact design outcomes and process across different conceptual design phases\",\"authors\":\"Pei Chen , Zhuoshu Li , Yexinrui Wu , Hongbo Zhang , Jiaxuan Zhou , Lingyun Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>During conceptual design, creative stimuli are an external source of inspiration to support students’ ideation process. Although existing research has explored the roles of creative stimuli, they rarely consider the intertwined influence brought by stimuli’s multiple characteristics, and overlook variations in stimuli’s effectiveness at different design phases. To fill this gap, this research conducted a <span><math><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></math></span> experiment, involving 72 design students in a three-phase design process and presenting combinations of textual and visual stimuli at distinct fidelities. We assessed different stimulus combinations’ influence on creativity, and employed behavior coding and linkograph to reveal students’ behavior and cognitive patterns throughout the process. The results revealed the mutual influence between the fidelity of texts and images, and students commonly needed more concrete stimuli in later design phases. Furthermore, students provided with different stimulus combinations exhibited variations in time allocation for behaviors including task analysis, idea generation, and evaluation, and they employed distinct approaches to generate new ideas. These findings highlight the necessity for design educators to dynamically provide creative stimuli based on the design phase, educational objective, and students’ state.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001950\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modality and fidelity: Understanding how creative stimulus combinations impact design outcomes and process across different conceptual design phases
During conceptual design, creative stimuli are an external source of inspiration to support students’ ideation process. Although existing research has explored the roles of creative stimuli, they rarely consider the intertwined influence brought by stimuli’s multiple characteristics, and overlook variations in stimuli’s effectiveness at different design phases. To fill this gap, this research conducted a experiment, involving 72 design students in a three-phase design process and presenting combinations of textual and visual stimuli at distinct fidelities. We assessed different stimulus combinations’ influence on creativity, and employed behavior coding and linkograph to reveal students’ behavior and cognitive patterns throughout the process. The results revealed the mutual influence between the fidelity of texts and images, and students commonly needed more concrete stimuli in later design phases. Furthermore, students provided with different stimulus combinations exhibited variations in time allocation for behaviors including task analysis, idea generation, and evaluation, and they employed distinct approaches to generate new ideas. These findings highlight the necessity for design educators to dynamically provide creative stimuli based on the design phase, educational objective, and students’ state.
期刊介绍:
Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.