致痫网络概念:SEEG 在病灶性癫痫探索中的应用

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103023
Fabrice Bartolomei
{"title":"致痫网络概念:SEEG 在病灶性癫痫探索中的应用","authors":"Fabrice Bartolomei","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advent of advanced brain imaging techniques has significantly enhanced the understanding and treatment of focal epilepsies, with identifiable brain lesions present in 80 % of cases. Despite this, surgical outcomes remain varied, often influenced by lesion type and location. Traditional lesion-centric approaches may overlook the complex organization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), which often extends beyond the visible lesion, emphasizing the need for comprehensive presurgical evaluations like stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in some cases. This article delves into the concept of epileptogenic networks, moving beyond the notion of a lesional epileptic focus. Through SEEG, three primary network types have been identified: the Epileptogenic Zone Network (EZN), characterized by regions with heightened epileptogenicity and seizure initiation; the Propagation Zone Network (PZN), involving regions with delayed and less intense epileptic activity; and Non-Involved networks (NI). Quantitative measures, such as the epileptogenicity index (EI), aid in delineating these networks, revealing that EZN can be focal or networked, with the latter being more prevalent.</div><div>The relationship between epilepsy-associated lesions and network organization is complex. Intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, like focal cortical dysplasia and periventricular nodular heterotopias, often generate epileptiform activities but may still involve broader epileptogenic networks. Non-intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, such as cavernomas and post-stroke lesions, typically lack inherent neuronal activity but can facilitate the development of extensive epileptogenic networks.</div><div>Understanding the intricacies of these networks is crucial for optimizing surgical interventions. Recognizing that lesions may represent just one node within a broader epileptogenic network underscores the importance of comprehensive SEEG evaluations to achieve better surgical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 6","pages":"Article 103023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies\",\"authors\":\"Fabrice Bartolomei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.103023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The advent of advanced brain imaging techniques has significantly enhanced the understanding and treatment of focal epilepsies, with identifiable brain lesions present in 80 % of cases. Despite this, surgical outcomes remain varied, often influenced by lesion type and location. Traditional lesion-centric approaches may overlook the complex organization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), which often extends beyond the visible lesion, emphasizing the need for comprehensive presurgical evaluations like stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in some cases. This article delves into the concept of epileptogenic networks, moving beyond the notion of a lesional epileptic focus. Through SEEG, three primary network types have been identified: the Epileptogenic Zone Network (EZN), characterized by regions with heightened epileptogenicity and seizure initiation; the Propagation Zone Network (PZN), involving regions with delayed and less intense epileptic activity; and Non-Involved networks (NI). Quantitative measures, such as the epileptogenicity index (EI), aid in delineating these networks, revealing that EZN can be focal or networked, with the latter being more prevalent.</div><div>The relationship between epilepsy-associated lesions and network organization is complex. Intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, like focal cortical dysplasia and periventricular nodular heterotopias, often generate epileptiform activities but may still involve broader epileptogenic networks. Non-intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, such as cavernomas and post-stroke lesions, typically lack inherent neuronal activity but can facilitate the development of extensive epileptogenic networks.</div><div>Understanding the intricacies of these networks is crucial for optimizing surgical interventions. Recognizing that lesions may represent just one node within a broader epileptogenic network underscores the importance of comprehensive SEEG evaluations to achieve better surgical outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 103023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000819\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先进脑成像技术的出现大大提高了人们对局灶性癫痫的认识和治疗水平,80% 的病例都能确定脑部病变。尽管如此,手术效果仍然参差不齐,往往受到病灶类型和位置的影响。传统的以病灶为中心的方法可能会忽略致痫区(EZ)的复杂组织结构,而致痫区往往超出了可见病灶的范围,这就强调了在某些病例中进行立体脑电图(SEEG)等综合术前评估的必要性。本文深入探讨了致痫网络的概念,超越了病变癫痫灶的概念。通过 SEEG,我们发现了三种主要的网络类型:致痫区网络(EZN),其特征是致痫性和癫痫发作起始性增强的区域;传播区网络(PZN),涉及癫痫活动延迟且强度较低的区域;以及非卷入网络(NI)。致痫指数(EI)等定量指标有助于划分这些网络,揭示出 EZN 可以是局灶性的,也可以是网络性的,后者更为普遍。内在致痫病变,如局灶性皮质发育不良和脑室周围结节性异位症,通常会产生痫样活动,但仍可能涉及更广泛的致痫网络。非内在致痫性病变,如海绵状瘤和卒中后病变,通常缺乏固有的神经元活动,但可促进广泛致痫网络的发展。认识到病变可能只是更广泛的致痫网络中的一个节点,强调了全面 SEEG 评估对取得更好手术效果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies
The advent of advanced brain imaging techniques has significantly enhanced the understanding and treatment of focal epilepsies, with identifiable brain lesions present in 80 % of cases. Despite this, surgical outcomes remain varied, often influenced by lesion type and location. Traditional lesion-centric approaches may overlook the complex organization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), which often extends beyond the visible lesion, emphasizing the need for comprehensive presurgical evaluations like stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in some cases. This article delves into the concept of epileptogenic networks, moving beyond the notion of a lesional epileptic focus. Through SEEG, three primary network types have been identified: the Epileptogenic Zone Network (EZN), characterized by regions with heightened epileptogenicity and seizure initiation; the Propagation Zone Network (PZN), involving regions with delayed and less intense epileptic activity; and Non-Involved networks (NI). Quantitative measures, such as the epileptogenicity index (EI), aid in delineating these networks, revealing that EZN can be focal or networked, with the latter being more prevalent.
The relationship between epilepsy-associated lesions and network organization is complex. Intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, like focal cortical dysplasia and periventricular nodular heterotopias, often generate epileptiform activities but may still involve broader epileptogenic networks. Non-intrinsically epileptogenic lesions, such as cavernomas and post-stroke lesions, typically lack inherent neuronal activity but can facilitate the development of extensive epileptogenic networks.
Understanding the intricacies of these networks is crucial for optimizing surgical interventions. Recognizing that lesions may represent just one node within a broader epileptogenic network underscores the importance of comprehensive SEEG evaluations to achieve better surgical outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
期刊最新文献
The epileptogenic network concept: Applications in the SEEG exploration of lesional focal epilepsies F-waves responses derived from low-intensity electrical stimulation: A method to explore split-hand pathogenesis Transcranial MEPs predict clinical outcome during minimally invasive dorsal decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy Twenty years of SIRPIDs: What have we learned? Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1