人类选择中强化物的前瞻性控制:错配和偏差(而非时间取向)影响强化物控制

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Processes Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105116
Stephanie Gomes-Ng , Kaung Thant Maung , Sarah Cowie
{"title":"人类选择中强化物的前瞻性控制:错配和偏差(而非时间取向)影响强化物控制","authors":"Stephanie Gomes-Ng ,&nbsp;Kaung Thant Maung ,&nbsp;Sarah Cowie","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research with nonhuman animals and children suggests reinforcer control is <em>prospective</em>; that is, behaviour is organised according to the likely future, as extrapolated from past experience. The present experiment extended this work to adult choice, and also explored the effects of individual differences in past, present, and future time-orientation on reinforcer control. Participants (<em>N</em> = 163) responded in a concurrent schedule in which the probability of a reinforcer at the same location as the previous reinforcer varied across conditions. Choice tracked these probabilities, albeit imperfectly, indicating that reinforcers controlled behaviour prospectively. Deviations in choice from reinforcer probabilities were well-captured by a quantitative model assuming that such deviations arise because reinforcers are <em>misallocated</em> to the wrong alternative and because of <em>biases</em> towards one alternative. This replicates previous findings in pigeons and children, hence demonstrating the cross-species generality and developmental continuity of prospective reinforcer control. Individual differences in time orientation appeared not to influence reinforcer control, although further work is needed to explore the conditions under which time orientation modulates prospective reinforcer control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 105116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective control by reinforcers in human choice: Misallocation and bias, but not time orientation, influences reinforcer control\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Gomes-Ng ,&nbsp;Kaung Thant Maung ,&nbsp;Sarah Cowie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research with nonhuman animals and children suggests reinforcer control is <em>prospective</em>; that is, behaviour is organised according to the likely future, as extrapolated from past experience. The present experiment extended this work to adult choice, and also explored the effects of individual differences in past, present, and future time-orientation on reinforcer control. Participants (<em>N</em> = 163) responded in a concurrent schedule in which the probability of a reinforcer at the same location as the previous reinforcer varied across conditions. Choice tracked these probabilities, albeit imperfectly, indicating that reinforcers controlled behaviour prospectively. Deviations in choice from reinforcer probabilities were well-captured by a quantitative model assuming that such deviations arise because reinforcers are <em>misallocated</em> to the wrong alternative and because of <em>biases</em> towards one alternative. This replicates previous findings in pigeons and children, hence demonstrating the cross-species generality and developmental continuity of prospective reinforcer control. Individual differences in time orientation appeared not to influence reinforcer control, although further work is needed to explore the conditions under which time orientation modulates prospective reinforcer control.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001311\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724001311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对非人类动物和儿童的研究表明,强化物控制是前瞻性的;也就是说,行为是根据过去的经验推断出的未来可能发生的情况来组织的。本实验将这一研究成果扩展到成人的选择上,同时还探讨了过去、现在和未来时间导向的个体差异对强化物控制的影响。参与者(N = 163)在同时进行的计划中做出反应,在不同的条件下,在与前一个强化物相同的位置出现强化物的概率是不同的。选择跟踪了这些概率,尽管并不完美,这表明强化物对行为的控制是前瞻性的。一个定量模型可以很好地捕捉到选择与强化物概率之间的偏差,该模型假定出现这种偏差的原因是强化物被错误地分配给了错误的替代物,以及对一种替代物的偏爱。这与之前在鸽子和儿童身上的发现如出一辙,从而证明了前瞻性强化物控制的跨物种普遍性和发展连续性。时间取向的个体差异似乎不会影响强化物控制,但还需要进一步研究时间取向在何种条件下会调节前瞻性强化物控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective control by reinforcers in human choice: Misallocation and bias, but not time orientation, influences reinforcer control
Research with nonhuman animals and children suggests reinforcer control is prospective; that is, behaviour is organised according to the likely future, as extrapolated from past experience. The present experiment extended this work to adult choice, and also explored the effects of individual differences in past, present, and future time-orientation on reinforcer control. Participants (N = 163) responded in a concurrent schedule in which the probability of a reinforcer at the same location as the previous reinforcer varied across conditions. Choice tracked these probabilities, albeit imperfectly, indicating that reinforcers controlled behaviour prospectively. Deviations in choice from reinforcer probabilities were well-captured by a quantitative model assuming that such deviations arise because reinforcers are misallocated to the wrong alternative and because of biases towards one alternative. This replicates previous findings in pigeons and children, hence demonstrating the cross-species generality and developmental continuity of prospective reinforcer control. Individual differences in time orientation appeared not to influence reinforcer control, although further work is needed to explore the conditions under which time orientation modulates prospective reinforcer control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Behavioural response of female Lewis rats toward 31-kHz ultrasonic calls Sex-based differences, diurnal and seasonal trends in thermoregulatory behaviour of nesting Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze Editorial Board Comparative analysis of tracking and behavioral patterns between wild-type and genetically modified fruit flies using computer vision and statistical methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1