台湾分娩环境感知量表的开发与心理测试

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104215
Li-Li Chen , Yu-Ying Lu , Meei-Ling Gau , Pei-Chun Chien , Kok-Min Seow , Hui-Ling Ku
{"title":"台湾分娩环境感知量表的开发与心理测试","authors":"Li-Li Chen ,&nbsp;Yu-Ying Lu ,&nbsp;Meei-Ling Gau ,&nbsp;Pei-Chun Chien ,&nbsp;Kok-Min Seow ,&nbsp;Hui-Ling Ku","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous research has shown that women's perceptions of their childbirth environment are critical in ensuring that they feel supported and in facilitating physiological childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To develop and validate the Perception of Childbirth Environment Scale (PCES) for expectant mothers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PCES was developed based on findings from a scoping review and a qualitative study on childbirth environments conducted by the authors. The scale underwent expert review to ensure relevance, clarity, and content validity, followed by face validity testing with five women. A total of 193 participants, recruited from two medical institutions, completed the PCES within 48 h after childbirth. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PCES comprised 10 items divided into two dimensions: comfort and control. “Comfort” factors included privacy, homeliness, familiarity, relaxation facilitation, and a sense of continuity in the room, while “Control” factors were reflected in elements like a birth companion, empowerment, and safety. The model demonstrated a good fit following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as adjustments based on modification indices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCES displayed strong reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing women's perceptions of their labor and childbirth environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric testing of the Perception of Childbirth Environment Scale in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Li-Li Chen ,&nbsp;Yu-Ying Lu ,&nbsp;Meei-Ling Gau ,&nbsp;Pei-Chun Chien ,&nbsp;Kok-Min Seow ,&nbsp;Hui-Ling Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous research has shown that women's perceptions of their childbirth environment are critical in ensuring that they feel supported and in facilitating physiological childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To develop and validate the Perception of Childbirth Environment Scale (PCES) for expectant mothers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PCES was developed based on findings from a scoping review and a qualitative study on childbirth environments conducted by the authors. The scale underwent expert review to ensure relevance, clarity, and content validity, followed by face validity testing with five women. A total of 193 participants, recruited from two medical institutions, completed the PCES within 48 h after childbirth. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PCES comprised 10 items divided into two dimensions: comfort and control. “Comfort” factors included privacy, homeliness, familiarity, relaxation facilitation, and a sense of continuity in the room, while “Control” factors were reflected in elements like a birth companion, empowerment, and safety. The model demonstrated a good fit following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as adjustments based on modification indices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCES displayed strong reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing women's perceptions of their labor and childbirth environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景以往的研究表明,妇女对分娩环境的感知对于确保她们感受到支持和促进生理分娩至关重要。方法PCES是根据作者对分娩环境进行的范围综述和定性研究的结果编制的。该量表经过了专家评审,以确保其相关性、清晰度和内容有效性,随后又在五名妇女中进行了面效测试。从两家医疗机构招募的 193 名参与者在产后 48 小时内完成了 PCES。信度采用 Cronbach's α 进行内部一致性评估。结果PCES包括10个项目,分为两个维度:舒适和控制。"舒适 "因素包括私密性、家的温馨感、熟悉感、放松便利性和房间的连续感,而 "控制 "因素则反映在陪产人员、授权和安全等要素上。经过探索性和确认性因素分析以及基于修正指数的调整,该模型显示出良好的拟合度。结论PCES显示出很强的可靠性和有效性,使其成为评估产妇对其分娩环境看法的合适工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and psychometric testing of the Perception of Childbirth Environment Scale in Taiwan

Background

Previous research has shown that women's perceptions of their childbirth environment are critical in ensuring that they feel supported and in facilitating physiological childbirth.

Aim

To develop and validate the Perception of Childbirth Environment Scale (PCES) for expectant mothers.

Methods

The PCES was developed based on findings from a scoping review and a qualitative study on childbirth environments conducted by the authors. The scale underwent expert review to ensure relevance, clarity, and content validity, followed by face validity testing with five women. A total of 193 participants, recruited from two medical institutions, completed the PCES within 48 h after childbirth. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results

The PCES comprised 10 items divided into two dimensions: comfort and control. “Comfort” factors included privacy, homeliness, familiarity, relaxation facilitation, and a sense of continuity in the room, while “Control” factors were reflected in elements like a birth companion, empowerment, and safety. The model demonstrated a good fit following exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as adjustments based on modification indices.

Conclusions

The PCES displayed strong reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing women's perceptions of their labor and childbirth environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1