头部相关传递函数的有限差分时域模拟精度与模型复杂度的关系

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ACOUSTICS Applied Acoustics Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110353
Julie Meyer , Sebastian Prepeliţă , Lorenzo Picinali
{"title":"头部相关传递函数的有限差分时域模拟精度与模型复杂度的关系","authors":"Julie Meyer ,&nbsp;Sebastian Prepeliţă ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Picinali","doi":"10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wave-based numerical tools such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solvers are useful for modeling several acoustic properties and interactions. While these numerical tools are widely used in acoustics, there seems to be less attention to assessing the quality of the produced outputs. However, in order to ensure that the obtained results are reliable, the quantification of the errors present in the simulation results is an essential step. There exists a mathematical process known as solution verification which aims at assessing the accuracy of the computed solutions. A relevant application for the FDTD method is the simulation of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs), since these are relatively complex to acoustically measure on humans. This paper aims at applying the solution verification process on HRTF modeling using the FDTD method to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated HRTF magnitudes with increased human head/torso model complexity. The FDTD-simulated HRTFs are also compared with respect to the similarity/dissimilarity of their spectrum and with respect to the relevance of these spectral variations on sound source localization. The results show that asymptotically extrapolating the FDTD-simulated HRTFs from a series of simulations provides more accurate HRTF predictions when compared to using single FDTD simulations ran on sub-millimeter grids, regardless of the model complexity. Results also demonstrate that the accuracy of the FDTD-simulated HRTF predictions decreases with increased model complexity. The localization performance predictions showed that the largest localization errors were obtained with models with the lowest complexities. Significant differences in predicted sound source localization performance were found between FDTD-simulated results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Acoustics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the accuracy of finite-difference time-domain simulations of head-related transfer functions as a function of model complexity\",\"authors\":\"Julie Meyer ,&nbsp;Sebastian Prepeliţă ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Picinali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wave-based numerical tools such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solvers are useful for modeling several acoustic properties and interactions. While these numerical tools are widely used in acoustics, there seems to be less attention to assessing the quality of the produced outputs. However, in order to ensure that the obtained results are reliable, the quantification of the errors present in the simulation results is an essential step. There exists a mathematical process known as solution verification which aims at assessing the accuracy of the computed solutions. A relevant application for the FDTD method is the simulation of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs), since these are relatively complex to acoustically measure on humans. This paper aims at applying the solution verification process on HRTF modeling using the FDTD method to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated HRTF magnitudes with increased human head/torso model complexity. The FDTD-simulated HRTFs are also compared with respect to the similarity/dissimilarity of their spectrum and with respect to the relevance of these spectral variations on sound source localization. The results show that asymptotically extrapolating the FDTD-simulated HRTFs from a series of simulations provides more accurate HRTF predictions when compared to using single FDTD simulations ran on sub-millimeter grids, regardless of the model complexity. Results also demonstrate that the accuracy of the FDTD-simulated HRTF predictions decreases with increased model complexity. The localization performance predictions showed that the largest localization errors were obtained with models with the lowest complexities. Significant differences in predicted sound source localization performance were found between FDTD-simulated results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Acoustics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X24005048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X24005048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于波的数值工具,如有限差分时域(FDTD)求解器,可用于对多种声学特性和相互作用进行建模。虽然这些数值工具被广泛应用于声学领域,但人们似乎不太关注对所生成结果的质量进行评估。然而,为了确保获得的结果是可靠的,量化模拟结果中存在的误差是必不可少的一步。有一种称为 "解决方案验证 "的数学过程,旨在评估计算解决方案的准确性。FDTD 方法的一个相关应用是模拟与头部相关的传递函数 (HRTF),因为对人体进行声学测量相对复杂。本文旨在利用 FDTD 方法对 HRTF 建模进行求解验证,以评估随着人体头部/躯干模型复杂度的增加,模拟 HRTF 幅值的准确性。本文还比较了 FDTD 模拟 HRTF 的频谱相似性/相似性,以及这些频谱变化与声源定位的相关性。结果表明,与使用亚毫米网格上运行的单个 FDTD 仿真相比,无论模型的复杂程度如何,从一系列仿真中渐近外推 FDTD 仿真的 HRTF 都能提供更准确的 HRTF 预测。结果还表明,FDTD 模拟 HRTF 预测的准确度会随着模型复杂度的增加而降低。定位性能预测显示,复杂度最低的模型获得的定位误差最大。FDTD 模拟结果与声源定位性能预测结果之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the accuracy of finite-difference time-domain simulations of head-related transfer functions as a function of model complexity
Wave-based numerical tools such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solvers are useful for modeling several acoustic properties and interactions. While these numerical tools are widely used in acoustics, there seems to be less attention to assessing the quality of the produced outputs. However, in order to ensure that the obtained results are reliable, the quantification of the errors present in the simulation results is an essential step. There exists a mathematical process known as solution verification which aims at assessing the accuracy of the computed solutions. A relevant application for the FDTD method is the simulation of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs), since these are relatively complex to acoustically measure on humans. This paper aims at applying the solution verification process on HRTF modeling using the FDTD method to evaluate the accuracy of the simulated HRTF magnitudes with increased human head/torso model complexity. The FDTD-simulated HRTFs are also compared with respect to the similarity/dissimilarity of their spectrum and with respect to the relevance of these spectral variations on sound source localization. The results show that asymptotically extrapolating the FDTD-simulated HRTFs from a series of simulations provides more accurate HRTF predictions when compared to using single FDTD simulations ran on sub-millimeter grids, regardless of the model complexity. Results also demonstrate that the accuracy of the FDTD-simulated HRTF predictions decreases with increased model complexity. The localization performance predictions showed that the largest localization errors were obtained with models with the lowest complexities. Significant differences in predicted sound source localization performance were found between FDTD-simulated results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Acoustics
Applied Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
618
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1968, Applied Acoustics has been publishing high quality research papers providing state-of-the-art coverage of research findings for engineers and scientists involved in applications of acoustics in the widest sense. Applied Acoustics looks not only at recent developments in the understanding of acoustics but also at ways of exploiting that understanding. The Journal aims to encourage the exchange of practical experience through publication and in so doing creates a fund of technological information that can be used for solving related problems. The presentation of information in graphical or tabular form is especially encouraged. If a report of a mathematical development is a necessary part of a paper it is important to ensure that it is there only as an integral part of a practical solution to a problem and is supported by data. Applied Acoustics encourages the exchange of practical experience in the following ways: • Complete Papers • Short Technical Notes • Review Articles; and thereby provides a wealth of technological information that can be used to solve related problems. Manuscripts that address all fields of applications of acoustics ranging from medicine and NDT to the environment and buildings are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fibonacci array-based temporal-spatial localization with neural networks Semi-analytical prediction of energy-based acoustical parameters in proscenium theatres Preparation and performance analysis of porous materials for road noise abatement using waste rubber tires Acoustic characteristics of whispered vowels: A dynamic feature exploration A high DOF and azimuth resolution beamforming via enhanced virtual aperture extension of joint linear prediction and inverse beamforming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1